Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball World Cup
Upcoming · in 88h 05m
Colombia logo

ColombiavsChile

Chile logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 24picks AIs split

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

5 markets · 6 models picked

Consensus split

How the lineup voted · Match winner

6 picks
  • Colombia 50% 3/6
  • Chile 50% 3/6

Model confidence

Each model's confidence in its pick (%)

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Colombia 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Colombia

Colombia has historically been the stronger basketball nation in South America with more consistent competitive depth and better FIBA rankin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Chile

Colombia has a strong home-court advantage and a favorable head-to-head record, winning 6 out of the last 10 encounters against Chile. Addit...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Colombia

Colombia holds a modest historical edge over Chile in FIBA competition from training data through 2023. Home-court advantage in a World Cup...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% Colombia

Based on general historical performance of these national teams in basketball, Colombia often has a slight edge over Chile. This prediction...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Chile

Chile has a historical edge over Colombia in their head-to-head matchups, particularly in competitive tournaments. While Colombia has home a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Chile

Chile has shown slightly better recent form in FIBA Americas competition, including a notable win over Brazil in 2025. Colombia lacks consis...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Under 164.5

World Cup basketball games at the mid-tier level (Colombia vs Chile) typically feature deliberate, defensive-minded play with lower pace tha...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over

Both teams have shown a tendency to engage in high-scoring games, with recent matches featuring scores above 150 points. This trend suggests...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% over

Both sides tend toward moderate pace in international play. Colombia's offense creates enough transition opportunities to push games above t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Under 145.5

Matches between developing basketball nations like Colombia and Chile often feature lower scoring due to less polished offensive execution a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over

Both Chile and Colombia tend to play at a high tempo, especially in tournament play where they aim to secure early advantages. Their offensi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Over 150.5

Both teams have moderate-paced offenses but lack elite defensive personnel. Friendly exhibition settings often see higher scoring. The total...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

Spread

Consensus
Colombia 2/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Colombia -4.5

Colombia's roster depth and FIBA ranking advantage suggest a modest home-court edge of 3–5 points. Colombia should win outright in most scen...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Colombia

Given Colombia's home-court advantage and recent form, they are likely to cover a -1 point spread against Chile. Their recent victories and...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% Colombia

Home status gives Colombia the projected edge in a matchup with limited recent separation. Chile has shown vulnerability on the road against...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Colombia -5.5

Colombia is generally considered the slightly stronger basketball program historically when compared to Chile. While a -5.5 spread implies a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Chile

Given Chile's historical advantage and potential to upset, they are predicted to cover a small spread, even if Colombia is considered the fa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 50% Chile +1.5

Spread is nearly a pick'em, reflecting the evenly matched contest. Chile's slight edge in recent form and experience makes the points with C...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

First half winner

Consensus
Colombia 3/5
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 57% Colombia

First-half performance in World Cup basketball often mirrors overall team quality because fatigue and adjustment are minimal early. Colombia...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Colombia

Colombia's strong start in recent games, coupled with their home-court advantage, suggests they will lead at halftime against Chile. Their r...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Colombia

Colombia typically establishes early rhythm at home and carries modest first-half leads in past cycles. Chile has been slower starters on th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Chile

Chile has a tendency to start matches strong, aiming to establish an early lead and disrupt the opponent's rhythm. This aggressive start oft...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 53% Away (Chile)

Chile tends to start games with strong defensive pressure, leading to early leads. Colombia may need time to adjust. Slight edge to Chile in...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

First half h2h

Consensus
Colombia 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Colombia

Aligning with the full-game prediction, Colombia is expected to establish an early lead due to a slightly stronger overall team. Favored tea...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 96–72 · 57%
-14.6u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 101–89 · 53%
-31.9u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 552–533 · 51%
-384.4u
o4-mini
o4-mini 53–52 · 50%
-17.6u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 402–405 · 50%
-207.1u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 142–144 · 50%
-45.3u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 142–147 · 49%
-42.1u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 692–758 · 48%
-594.0u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 685–757 · 48%
-457.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 407–456 · 47%
-316.4u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 522–591 · 47%
-364.3u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 84–96 · 47%
-35.7u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 77–92 · 46%
-36.4u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 532–640 · 45%
-452.6u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 672–829 · 45%
-671.1u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 108–151 · 42%
-78.6u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 822837abfc22bb85…
Kickoff
Sat, Jul 4 · 00:00 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 9509,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "World Cup",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-04T00:00:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sat, 04 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Chile",
        "home": "Colombia"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →