Austin IIvsColorado Rapids II
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
home_ -0.5 1/4 models |
Austin II 4/4 models |
over 4/4 models |
yes 4/4 models |
home_ -1 1/4 models |
Austin II 4/4 models |
Austin II / Austin II 3/4 models |
2-1 4/4 models |
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
home_ -0.5 |
65%
Austin II |
53%
over |
58%
yes |
48%
home_ -1 |
52%
Austin II |
38%
Austin II / Austin II |
22%
2-1 |
|
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
home_ -0.5 Austin II hold clear home edge per form and H2H. Similar rest reduces rotation risk. Training data through 2025-09 backs home Asian handicap...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
65%
Austin II Austin II better record and venue advantage make them favorites. Similar rest days limit fatigue edge. Training data through 2025-09 favors...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Both sides average over 3 goals per game combined in recent form. Outdoor venue but no weather suppression noted. Training data through 2025...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
58%
yes Austin concede few but Colorado score regularly away. Recent H2H ended 3-2 with both teams scoring. Training data through 2025-09 supports B...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
home_ -1 Home side favored but margin often narrow in reserves league. Form suggests Austin cover -1 around half the time. Training data through 2025...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Austin II Austin II show stronger recent form with 3 wins in last 5 and only 3 goals conceded. They won the only prior H2H 3-2 at home. Training data...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
38%
Austin II / Austin II Austin likely lead at half given home form and then close out. Recent H2H saw home win after open start. Training data through 2025-09 shows...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
22%
2-1 Expected low-scoring but home win aligns with form and H2H result. Both teams concede regularly enough for 2-1. Training data through 2025-0... |
|||||||||
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
46%
Austin II -1.0 |
76%
Austin II |
54%
over |
55%
yes |
45%
Austin II -1 |
58%
Austin II |
38%
Austin II / Austin II |
14%
2-1 |
|
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
46%
Austin II -1.0 While Austin II are favorites, the -1.0 Asian Handicap requires them to win by at least two goals for a full win. Given Colorado's scoring c...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
76%
Austin II Austin II's superior form and home advantage make them a strong pick here. Removing the draw option further solidifies their position as the...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
over Both teams have scored 8 goals in their last 5 matches, and their only head-to-head game ended 3-2. While Austin II's defense is strong, Col...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Both teams have demonstrated an ability to score, with 8 goals each in their last five outings. The previous head-to-head match also saw bot...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
45%
Austin II -1 Austin II is the stronger team at home, backed by their better form and H2H win. A multi-goal victory is plausible given Colorado Rapids II'...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Austin II Austin II shows significantly better recent form with 3 wins in 5 matches and a strong defensive record. They also won the sole head-to-head...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
38%
Austin II / Austin II Austin II's superior form and home advantage suggest they will start strong and maintain their lead. They are expected to be the dominant si...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
14%
2-1 Austin II's strong attack and solid defense, combined with Colorado Rapids II's ability to score and their weaker defense, point to a home w... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
53%
home_ 0.0 |
55%
Austin II |
58%
over |
62%
yes |
51%
Colorado Rapids II |
52%
Austin II |
35%
Draw / Austin II |
15%
2-1 |
|
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
53%
home_ 0.0 Austin II's stronger home form and the win in their previous encounter suggest they are less likely to lose this match. The even handicap re...
3 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
Austin II Given Austin II's superior home form and their recent head-to-head victory, they are more likely to secure at least a draw. Colorado Rapids...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over Both teams have scored 8 goals in their last 5 matches, indicating a reasonable scoring rate. The previous head-to-head match resulted in 5...
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
62%
yes Both Austin II and Colorado Rapids II have scored in 3 of their last 5 matches. Additionally, both teams conceded 8 goals in their last 5 ga...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Colorado Rapids II Colorado Rapids II has a slightly higher scoring rate per game on average in their last 5 matches (1.6 vs 1.6 for Austin II). If they can ca...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Austin II Austin II has stronger recent home form (3W-1D-1L in last 5) compared to Colorado Rapids II's recent away form (2L in last 2 of 5). While he...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
35%
Draw / Austin II Austin II's solid home form suggests they are capable of winning, but their recent matches have seen them concede. It's plausible they could...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
2-1 Considering Austin II's home advantage and Colorado Rapids II's mixed away form, a narrow home win seems likely. A 2-1 scoreline reflects Au...
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
52%
Austin II -0.5 |
60%
Austin II |
62%
over |
61%
yes |
34%
Austin II |
52%
Austin II |
31%
Austin II / Austin II |
11%
2-1 |
|
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
52%
Austin II -0.5 The half-ball line removes the draw outcome, effectively pricing Austin II to win vs. the field. My 52% home win probability from the h2h ma...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
60%
Austin II Removing the draw boosts Austin II's implied edge because the stalemate probability is a meaningful 24% and I split the non-draw share more...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over The reference data points heavily toward goals: Austin II's five matches averaged 2.2 total goals, Colorado Rapids II's averaged 3.2, and th...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
61%
yes Colorado Rapids II scored 8 in five matches, so they are not a side that gets shut out easily, and Austin II's home clean-sheet record, whil...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
34%
Austin II A one-goal handicap is a tall order for a developmental side, and my confidence in Austin II covering -1 is only around one in three. Their...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Austin II No live access, so this is built from the supplied settled-results reference data and my training knowledge through early 2025. Austin II ar...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
31%
Austin II / Austin II Home/home is the modal ht/ft path given Austin II are the stronger side and tend to control matches at Parmer Field. The draw/home combinati...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
11%
2-1 The 2-1 scoreline narrowly edges 1-1 as the modal result, reflecting Austin II's slight attacking edge paired with Colorado Rapids II's tend... |
|||||||||
Asian handicap
Consensushome_ -0.5 1/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
55%
home_ -0.5
Austin II hold clear home edge per form and H2H. Similar rest reduces rotation risk. Training data through 2025-09 backs home Asian handicap...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
46%
Austin II -1.0
While Austin II are favorites, the -1.0 Asian Handicap requires them to win by at least two goals for a full win. Given Colorado's scoring c...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
53%
home_ 0.0
Austin II's stronger home form and the win in their previous encounter suggest they are less likely to lose this match. The even handicap re...
DeepSeek V3
52%
Austin II -0.5
The half-ball line removes the draw outcome, effectively pricing Austin II to win vs. the field. My 52% home win probability from the h2h ma...
Draw no bet
ConsensusAustin II 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
65%
Austin II
Austin II better record and venue advantage make them favorites. Similar rest days limit fatigue edge. Training data through 2025-09 favors...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
76%
Austin II
Austin II's superior form and home advantage make them a strong pick here. Removing the draw option further solidifies their position as the...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
Austin II
Given Austin II's superior home form and their recent head-to-head victory, they are more likely to secure at least a draw. Colorado Rapids...
DeepSeek V3
60%
Austin II
Removing the draw boosts Austin II's implied edge because the stalemate probability is a meaningful 24% and I split the non-draw share more...
Over / Under
Consensusover 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
53%
over
Both sides average over 3 goals per game combined in recent form. Outdoor venue but no weather suppression noted. Training data through 2025...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
54%
over
Both teams have scored 8 goals in their last 5 matches, and their only head-to-head game ended 3-2. While Austin II's defense is strong, Col...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
58%
over
Both teams have scored 8 goals in their last 5 matches, indicating a reasonable scoring rate. The previous head-to-head match resulted in 5...
DeepSeek V3
62%
over
The reference data points heavily toward goals: Austin II's five matches averaged 2.2 total goals, Colorado Rapids II's averaged 3.2, and th...
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
58%
yes
Austin concede few but Colorado score regularly away. Recent H2H ended 3-2 with both teams scoring. Training data through 2025-09 supports B...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
55%
yes
Both teams have demonstrated an ability to score, with 8 goals each in their last five outings. The previous head-to-head match also saw bot...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
62%
yes
Both Austin II and Colorado Rapids II have scored in 3 of their last 5 matches. Additionally, both teams conceded 8 goals in their last 5 ga...
DeepSeek V3
61%
yes
Colorado Rapids II scored 8 in five matches, so they are not a side that gets shut out easily, and Austin II's home clean-sheet record, whil...
Spread
Consensushome_ -1 1/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
48%
home_ -1
Home side favored but margin often narrow in reserves league. Form suggests Austin cover -1 around half the time. Training data through 2025...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
45%
Austin II -1
Austin II is the stronger team at home, backed by their better form and H2H win. A multi-goal victory is plausible given Colorado Rapids II'...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
51%
Colorado Rapids II
Colorado Rapids II has a slightly higher scoring rate per game on average in their last 5 matches (1.6 vs 1.6 for Austin II). If they can ca...
DeepSeek V3
34%
Austin II
A one-goal handicap is a tall order for a developmental side, and my confidence in Austin II covering -1 is only around one in three. Their...
Match winner
ConsensusAustin II 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
52%
Austin II
Austin II show stronger recent form with 3 wins in last 5 and only 3 goals conceded. They won the only prior H2H 3-2 at home. Training data...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
58%
Austin II
Austin II shows significantly better recent form with 3 wins in 5 matches and a strong defensive record. They also won the sole head-to-head...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
52%
Austin II
Austin II has stronger recent home form (3W-1D-1L in last 5) compared to Colorado Rapids II's recent away form (2L in last 2 of 5). While he...
DeepSeek V3
52%
Austin II
No live access, so this is built from the supplied settled-results reference data and my training knowledge through early 2025. Austin II ar...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusAustin II / Austin II 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
38%
Austin II / Austin II
Austin likely lead at half given home form and then close out. Recent H2H saw home win after open start. Training data through 2025-09 shows...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38%
Austin II / Austin II
Austin II's superior form and home advantage suggest they will start strong and maintain their lead. They are expected to be the dominant si...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
35%
Draw / Austin II
Austin II's solid home form suggests they are capable of winning, but their recent matches have seen them concede. It's plausible they could...
DeepSeek V3
31%
Austin II / Austin II
Home/home is the modal ht/ft path given Austin II are the stronger side and tend to control matches at Parmer Field. The draw/home combinati...
Correct score
Consensus2-1 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
22%
2-1
Expected low-scoring but home win aligns with form and H2H result. Both teams concede regularly enough for 2-1. Training data through 2025-0...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
14%
2-1
Austin II's strong attack and solid defense, combined with Colorado Rapids II's ability to score and their weaker defense, point to a home w...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
15%
2-1
Considering Austin II's home advantage and Colorado Rapids II's mixed away form, a narrow home win seems likely. A 2-1 scoreline reflects Au...
DeepSeek V3
11%
2-1
The 2-1 scoreline narrowly edges 1-1 as the modal result, reflecting Austin II's slight attacking edge paired with Colorado Rapids II's tend...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Austin II
Grok 4 Fast
Austin II
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Austin II
DeepSeek V3
Austin II
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Call the exact final score
Free account. Pick the exact final score, lock it before kickoff, beat the AI consensus across the WC and win a lifetime free plan.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
d8b70fde9684ba85…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Sep 14 · 00:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 43299,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Parmer Filed",
"league": "MLS Next Pro",
"starts_at": "2026-09-14T00:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 14 Sep 2026 00:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Colorado Rapids II",
"home": "Austin II"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LLWDD",
"record": "1W-2D-2L",
"scored": 8,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 8
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WLWDW",
"record": "3W-1D-1L",
"scored": 8,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 3
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 8,
"home": 9
},
"head_to_head": {
"recent": [
"2026-07-06: Austin II 3–2 Colorado Rapids II"
],
"matches": 1
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.