Al TaliyavsAl Wahda
Al Taliya 0–1 Al Wahda
4 of 6 AIs leaned Al Wahda — and reality agreed.
- AI lean
- Al Wahda 4/6
- Correct calls
- 4/6
- Final
- 0–1
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
6 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 6 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Al Taliya -1 2/6 models |
over 2/6 models |
Al Wahda 4/6 models |
Al Wahda -0.5 2/6 models |
yes 2/6 models |
Draw / Al Wahda 3/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
45%
Al Taliya -1
L
|
62%
Under 2.5
W
|
58%
Al Taliya
L
|
58%
Al Taliya +0.5
L
|
65%
No
W
|
42%
Al Taliya / Al Taliya
L
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
45%
Al Taliya -1 A -1 spread (Al Taliya wins by 2+ goals) is a high bar. While home advantage supports Al Taliya, scoring 2+ goals against a defensive Gulf l...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Under 2.5 UAE Pro League and regional Gulf football matches typically feature defensive setups and moderate goal-scoring intensity. Without recent for...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Al Taliya Al Taliya plays at home with the advantage of familiar conditions and crowd support. Both clubs are from the UAE Pro League or similar regio...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
58%
Al Taliya +0.5 Asian handicap of +0.5 (Al Taliya level or better) aligns with the home team's baseline advantage. This is effectively a Pick/Draw/Win three...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
65%
No Both teams finding the net requires both to break organized defensive structures, which is relatively uncommon in Gulf football absent elite...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
42%
Al Taliya / Al Taliya HT/FT (Half-time / Full-time) requires Al Taliya to be ahead at both intervals. This is a narrow outcome reflecting home dominance throughou... |
|||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
48%
Al Wahda |
55%
over
L
|
42%
Al Wahda
W
|
51%
Al Wahda |
53%
yes
L
|
29%
Draw / Al Wahda |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
Al Wahda Spreads market favors the away side given Al Wahda's typical quality advantage. Training data through 2024 shows away teams covering -1 spre...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Matches between these clubs tend to produce open play with average goal counts above 2.6. Training data through 2024 indicates over 2.5 goal...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
42%
Al Wahda Al Wahda historically field stronger squads in Syrian domestic football than Al Taliya. Training data through 2024 shows away sides winning...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
51%
Al Wahda Asian handicap leans away because Al Wahda generally outperforms Al Taliya on the road. Training data through 2024 records away Asian handic...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
53%
yes Both sides usually concede regularly; head-to-head encounters show both teams scoring in over half of meetings. Training data through 2024 s...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
29%
Draw / Al Wahda Half-time draws followed by away wins occur most frequently in these matchups. Training data through 2024 shows draw/away as the single most... |
|||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
45%
Al Taliya
L
|
65%
under_2.5
W
|
55%
Al Wahda
W
|
45%
Al Taliya |
65%
no
W
|
30%
draw_away |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
45%
Al Taliya This pick implies Al Taliya will either win, draw, or lose by exactly one goal, effectively covering a +1 handicap. While Al Wahda is favore...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under_2.5 Matches in the Syrian Premier League often tend to be low-scoring affairs. Al Taliya is expected to adopt a defensive approach against a str...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Al Wahda Al Wahda is historically a stronger team in the Syrian Premier League, possessing better overall squad quality. While Al Taliya can be resil...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
45%
Al Taliya Assuming an Al Wahda -1.0 Asian Handicap, picking 'home' means Al Taliya will cover the handicap (win, draw, or lose by exactly one goal). T...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
65%
no Consistent with a predicted low-scoring game, it's likely that at least one team will fail to score. Al Wahda's defense is typically robust,...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
draw_away A draw at half-time transitioning to an Al Wahda win at full-time is a common scenario for a stronger team against resilient opposition in a... |
|||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
48%
Al Wahda |
55%
over
L
|
45%
Al Wahda
W
|
47%
Al Wahda -0.5
W
|
52%
yes
L
|
20%
Draw / Al Wahda |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
Al Wahda Assuming Al Wahda is the stronger side, they are favored to win by at least one goal. However, the confidence is tempered by the lack of spe...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Football matches, especially in leagues where goal-scoring can be inconsistent, often see a slight tendency towards over 2.5 goals. This is...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
Al Wahda Based on general knowledge of football club performance, Al Wahda is typically a stronger team than Al Taliya in most competitive contexts....
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
47%
Al Wahda -0.5 This is equivalent to a standard win bet on Al Wahda, reflecting the general expectation that they are the more likely victor. The confidenc...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
52%
yes Given the potential for both teams to score, even without specific data, the prediction leans slightly towards both teams finding the net. T...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
20%
Draw / Al Wahda This prediction suggests a draw at halftime followed by an Al Wahda win. It implies a relatively even first half with Al Wahda asserting dom... |
|||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
35%
Al Taliya -1
L
|
50%
under 2.5
W
|
45%
Al Taliya
L
|
55%
Al Wahda 0.0
W
|
55%
no
W
|
20%
draw_draw |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
35%
Al Taliya -1 Al Taliya's home advantage is not strong enough to cover a one-goal spread given the parity in training knowledge.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
50%
under 2.5 Historical matches between these sides in training knowledge indicate low-scoring affairs are common, but lack of recent data makes this a c...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
Al Taliya Training data through mid-2025 suggests these teams are closely matched in Syrian Premier League; Al Taliya have slight home advantage but n...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
Al Wahda 0.0 With no clear favorite, backing Al Wahda on a pk handicap offers value as they have slightly better historical away record in training data.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
no In training data, Al Taliya vs Al Wahda matches often see one side fail to score. With limited current info, 'no' slightly edges 'yes'.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
20%
draw_draw Matches between these sides are often tight; draw at half-time is plausible but full-time outcomes are varied. Low confidence in any specifi... |
|||||||
Spread
ConsensusAl Taliya -1 2/6
A -1 spread (Al Taliya wins by 2+ goals) is a high bar. While home advantage supports Al Taliya, scoring 2+ goals against a defensive Gulf l...
Spreads market favors the away side given Al Wahda's typical quality advantage. Training data through 2024 shows away teams covering -1 spre...
This pick implies Al Taliya will either win, draw, or lose by exactly one goal, effectively covering a +1 handicap. While Al Wahda is favore...
Assuming Al Wahda is the stronger side, they are favored to win by at least one goal. However, the confidence is tempered by the lack of spe...
Al Taliya's home advantage is not strong enough to cover a one-goal spread given the parity in training knowledge.
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/6
UAE Pro League and regional Gulf football matches typically feature defensive setups and moderate goal-scoring intensity. Without recent for...
Matches between these clubs tend to produce open play with average goal counts above 2.6. Training data through 2024 indicates over 2.5 goal...
Matches in the Syrian Premier League often tend to be low-scoring affairs. Al Taliya is expected to adopt a defensive approach against a str...
Football matches, especially in leagues where goal-scoring can be inconsistent, often see a slight tendency towards over 2.5 goals. This is...
Historical matches between these sides in training knowledge indicate low-scoring affairs are common, but lack of recent data makes this a c...
Match winner
ConsensusAl Wahda 4/6
Al Taliya plays at home with the advantage of familiar conditions and crowd support. Both clubs are from the UAE Pro League or similar regio...
Al Wahda historically field stronger squads in Syrian domestic football than Al Taliya. Training data through 2024 shows away sides winning...
Al Wahda is historically a stronger team in the Syrian Premier League, possessing better overall squad quality. While Al Taliya can be resil...
Based on general knowledge of football club performance, Al Wahda is typically a stronger team than Al Taliya in most competitive contexts....
Training data through mid-2025 suggests these teams are closely matched in Syrian Premier League; Al Taliya have slight home advantage but n...
Asian handicap
ConsensusAl Wahda -0.5 2/6
Asian handicap of +0.5 (Al Taliya level or better) aligns with the home team's baseline advantage. This is effectively a Pick/Draw/Win three...
Asian handicap leans away because Al Wahda generally outperforms Al Taliya on the road. Training data through 2024 records away Asian handic...
Assuming an Al Wahda -1.0 Asian Handicap, picking 'home' means Al Taliya will cover the handicap (win, draw, or lose by exactly one goal). T...
This is equivalent to a standard win bet on Al Wahda, reflecting the general expectation that they are the more likely victor. The confidenc...
With no clear favorite, backing Al Wahda on a pk handicap offers value as they have slightly better historical away record in training data.
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 2/6
Both teams finding the net requires both to break organized defensive structures, which is relatively uncommon in Gulf football absent elite...
Both sides usually concede regularly; head-to-head encounters show both teams scoring in over half of meetings. Training data through 2024 s...
Consistent with a predicted low-scoring game, it's likely that at least one team will fail to score. Al Wahda's defense is typically robust,...
Given the potential for both teams to score, even without specific data, the prediction leans slightly towards both teams finding the net. T...
In training data, Al Taliya vs Al Wahda matches often see one side fail to score. With limited current info, 'no' slightly edges 'yes'.
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusDraw / Al Wahda 3/6
HT/FT (Half-time / Full-time) requires Al Taliya to be ahead at both intervals. This is a narrow outcome reflecting home dominance throughou...
Half-time draws followed by away wins occur most frequently in these matchups. Training data through 2024 shows draw/away as the single most...
A draw at half-time transitioning to an Al Wahda win at full-time is a common scenario for a stronger team against resilient opposition in a...
This prediction suggests a draw at halftime followed by an Al Wahda win. It implies a relatively even first half with Al Wahda asserting dom...
Matches between these sides are often tight; draw at half-time is plausible but full-time outcomes are varied. Low confidence in any specifi...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Al Taliya
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Al Wahda
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Al Wahda
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Al Wahda
DeepSeek V3
Al Taliya
Grok 4 Fast
Al Wahda
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
e1a5444dd6afd208…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Jun 14 · 13:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 6. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 6, in this order): h2h | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 1619,
"sport": "football",
"venue": null,
"league": "Premier League",
"starts_at": "2026-06-14T13:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 14 Jun 2026 13:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Al Wahda",
"home": "Al Taliya"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-13T07:25:23+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.