Minnesota TwinsvsLos Angeles Angels
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Minnesota Twins 5/6 models |
Over 8.5 3/6 models |
Minnesota Twins -1.5 3/6 models |
Minnesota Twins 4/5 models |
over 1/1 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Minnesota Twins |
62%
Over 8.5 |
60%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
64%
Minnesota Twins |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Minnesota Twins Minnesota enters with dominant recent form (4W-1L over last 5, outscoring opponents 28–16) while Los Angeles has collapsed (1W-4L, 24–29 run...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 8.5 Minnesota has scored 28 runs in 5 recent games (5.6 per game), and the Angels, despite poor form, have allowed 29 runs in 5 games (5.8 per g...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 The Twins' superior form and run differential support a margin win of 2+ runs; however, baseball's inherent variance (single-game volatility...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
64%
Minnesota Twins The Twins' strong offensive form (5.6 runs per game) and the Angels' recent pitching vulnerability (5.8 runs allowed per game) suggest Minne...
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Los Angeles Angels |
60%
under |
55%
Los Angeles Angels |
55%
Los Angeles Angels |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Los Angeles Angels The Los Angeles Angels have a slightly better record on the road (15-30) compared to the Minnesota Twins' home record (22-23). Additionally,...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
under Both teams have relatively low scoring averages, with the Angels averaging 4.4 runs per game and the Twins 4.9. Additionally, both teams hav...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Los Angeles Angels The Angels' slight edge in road performance and offensive statistics suggests they are more likely to cover the -1 spread. While both teams...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Los Angeles Angels The Angels' slight edge in road performance and offensive statistics suggests they are more likely to lead after the first five innings. Whi...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Minnesota Twins |
53%
over |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Minnesota Twins Twins enter with superior recent form (4-1) compared to Angels (1-4) and enjoy home-field advantage. Both teams have identical 3 rest days b...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Angels have conceded 29 runs in last 5 while Twins offense is scoring 5.6 per game. Outdoor venue and typical July conditions lean toward hi...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Minnesota Twins Home team with 4-1 form and better run prevention is the logical side on the run line. Angels recent 1-4 skid and defensive lapses increase...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Minnesota Twins Twins home edge and stronger recent results apply to the first five innings as well. Early-game bullpen usage and starter matchups typically...
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
68%
Minnesota Twins |
58%
Over 8.5 |
55%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
60%
Minnesota Twins |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Minnesota Twins Based on recent form, the Minnesota Twins are performing significantly better, winning four of their last five games while the Los Angeles A...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 8.5 Both teams' recent games suggest a tendency for higher scoring, with the Angels particularly struggling defensively and the Twins showing go...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 The Minnesota Twins' superior recent form, winning four of their last five games, indicates a strong chance they will secure a comfortable v...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
60%
Minnesota Twins Relying on the general team strength and recent performance, the Minnesota Twins are expected to have an early advantage. Their current form...
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
over |
52%
Los Angeles Angels |
— |
58%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins are in better recent form and have a stronger home record. Their probable starter, Pablo López, has been dominant at hom...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown offensive capability recently, and the Twins' home park is generally neutral to hitter-friendly. While both starting p...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Los Angeles Angels While the Twins are favored to win, the Angels have been competitive in close games, and their offense can put up runs. The Twins have won m...
3 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
58%
over Both starting pitchers have demonstrated the ability to keep games close early on, but also have periods where they can be hit. The Twins' o...
3 sources cited
|
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Over 8.5 |
47%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
54%
Minnesota Twins |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Minnesota Twins The Twins have won four of their last five, while the Angels are on a four-game losing streak. Minnesota's recent form and home-field advant...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Both teams are scoring well (Angels 24 runs, Twins 28 in last 5), and the Angels' pitching has struggled (conceded 29). Target Field is neut...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
47%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 The Twins are favored to win, but covering a 1.5-run spread requires a multi-run margin. Given the Angels' recent collapses, it's possible,...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Minnesota Twins The first five innings often favor the starting pitcher, and the Twins have a strong recent start. The Angels' poor form early could carry o...
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
Match winner
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 5/6
Minnesota enters with dominant recent form (4W-1L over last 5, outscoring opponents 28–16) while Los Angeles has collapsed (1W-4L, 24–29 run...
The Los Angeles Angels have a slightly better record on the road (15-30) compared to the Minnesota Twins' home record (22-23). Additionally,...
Twins enter with superior recent form (4-1) compared to Angels (1-4) and enjoy home-field advantage. Both teams have identical 3 rest days b...
Based on recent form, the Minnesota Twins are performing significantly better, winning four of their last five games while the Los Angeles A...
The Minnesota Twins are in better recent form and have a stronger home record. Their probable starter, Pablo López, has been dominant at hom...
The Twins have won four of their last five, while the Angels are on a four-game losing streak. Minnesota's recent form and home-field advant...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 8.5 3/6
Minnesota has scored 28 runs in 5 recent games (5.6 per game), and the Angels, despite poor form, have allowed 29 runs in 5 games (5.8 per g...
Both teams have relatively low scoring averages, with the Angels averaging 4.4 runs per game and the Twins 4.9. Additionally, both teams hav...
Angels have conceded 29 runs in last 5 while Twins offense is scoring 5.6 per game. Outdoor venue and typical July conditions lean toward hi...
Both teams' recent games suggest a tendency for higher scoring, with the Angels particularly struggling defensively and the Twins showing go...
Both teams have shown offensive capability recently, and the Twins' home park is generally neutral to hitter-friendly. While both starting p...
Both teams are scoring well (Angels 24 runs, Twins 28 in last 5), and the Angels' pitching has struggled (conceded 29). Target Field is neut...
Spread
ConsensusMinnesota Twins -1.5 3/6
The Twins' superior form and run differential support a margin win of 2+ runs; however, baseball's inherent variance (single-game volatility...
The Angels' slight edge in road performance and offensive statistics suggests they are more likely to cover the -1 spread. While both teams...
Home team with 4-1 form and better run prevention is the logical side on the run line. Angels recent 1-4 skid and defensive lapses increase...
The Minnesota Twins' superior recent form, winning four of their last five games, indicates a strong chance they will secure a comfortable v...
While the Twins are favored to win, the Angels have been competitive in close games, and their offense can put up runs. The Twins have won m...
The Twins are favored to win, but covering a 1.5-run spread requires a multi-run margin. Given the Angels' recent collapses, it's possible,...
First 5 innings
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 4/5
The Twins' strong offensive form (5.6 runs per game) and the Angels' recent pitching vulnerability (5.8 runs allowed per game) suggest Minne...
The Angels' slight edge in road performance and offensive statistics suggests they are more likely to lead after the first five innings. Whi...
Twins home edge and stronger recent results apply to the first five innings as well. Early-game bullpen usage and starter matchups typically...
Relying on the general team strength and recent performance, the Minnesota Twins are expected to have an early advantage. Their current form...
The first five innings often favor the starting pitcher, and the Twins have a strong recent start. The Angels' poor form early could carry o...
First five innings over 4.5
Consensusover 1/1
Both starting pitchers have demonstrated the ability to keep games close early on, but also have periods where they can be hit. The Twins' o...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Minnesota Twins
Grok 4 Fast
Minnesota Twins
DeepSeek V3
Minnesota Twins
GPT-4o Mini
Los Angeles Angels
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
066fe3afb07051f1…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Jul 12 · 18:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 12106,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-07-12T18:10:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 12 Jul 2026 18:10:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Los Angeles Angels",
"home": "Minnesota Twins"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WLLLL",
"record": "1W-0D-4L",
"scored": 24,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 29
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WWWWL",
"record": "4W-0D-1L",
"scored": 28,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 16
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 3,
"home": 3
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.