Minnesota TwinsvsCleveland Guardians
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Minnesota Twins 5/6 models |
over 4/6 models |
Minnesota Twins -1.5 2/6 models |
Minnesota Twins 3/5 models |
over 1/1 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Over 8.5 |
52%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
54%
Under 4.5 |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Minnesota Twins Both teams are evenly matched in recent form (3-2 records over last 5) and rest (4 days each), but the Twins play at home where they have a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Over the last 5 matches, the Twins scored 30 runs (6.0 per game) and the Guardians 22 (4.4 per game); combined, that averages 10.4 runs per...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 The Twins have a marginal home-field advantage and a +8 run differential (vs Guardians' +3) over the last 5 games, suggesting they are the s...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Under 4.5 Early innings are typically lower-scoring in baseball, particularly when both teams are well-rested and starting pitchers are fresh. While t...
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
60%
over |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins have a strong home advantage, with a recent home record of 3 wins and 2 losses, scoring 30 runs and conceding 22 in thei...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown a tendency to score runs in their recent games, with the Twins scoring 30 runs and conceding 22, and the Guardians sco...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins' home advantage and recent form suggest they are likely to win by at least two runs. Their recent home performance, with...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins' strong home performance and recent form suggest they are likely to lead after the first five innings. Their recent home...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Minnesota Twins |
51%
over |
52%
away_ +1.5 |
54%
Minnesota Twins |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Minnesota Twins Twins show stronger recent scoring (30 runs in last 5) than Guardians (22 runs) despite identical 3-2 records. Both clubs enter with 4 rest...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Both teams average over 5 runs per game in recent form and ballpark factors at Minnesota typically play neutral to hitter-friendly in July....
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
away_ +1.5 Guardians have shown ability to stay within one run in recent losses and Twins offensive edge is not large enough to cover -1.5 consistently...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Minnesota Twins Minnesota's lineup has posted higher early-inning output historically and the home starter matchup is expected to hold a modest edge. Limite...
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
54%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Over 8.5 |
52%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
45%
Minnesota Twins |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
Minnesota Twins This prediction is based on general team strength from training data prior to 2026, as specific game-day factors for July 2026 are unavailab...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Without specific pitching matchups for this 2026 game, the prediction leans on the combined run-scoring and conceding trends from both teams...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Assuming the Twins can leverage their home advantage and recent offensive strength to secure a win, there's a moderate chance they could win...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
45%
Minnesota Twins Given the lack of specific starting pitcher information for this future game, the Twins' slightly more potent offense in recent form suggest...
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Cleveland Guardians |
60%
over |
52%
Cleveland Guardians |
— |
58%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Cleveland Guardians The Guardians have shown slightly better recent form despite both teams having identical 3-2 records over their last five games. Their pitch...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have strong offenses capable of scoring runs, and their recent games have seen a decent number of runs scored. The ballpark in Mi...
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Cleveland Guardians While the Guardians are favored to win outright, the margin is expected to be close. However, their recent form and slight offensive edge su...
2 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
58%
over Both starting pitchers have been decent, but the offenses for both teams tend to start strong. The Guardians' lineup, in particular, has a g...
2 sources cited
|
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
52%
over |
50%
Cleveland Guardians |
40%
Draw |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins Both teams have similar recent form (3-2 last 5) and equal rest. The Twins have a slight home field advantage at Target Field. However, with...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both teams have been scoring well recently (Guardians 22 runs in 5 games, Twins 30). With neither bullpen specified, the trend favors runs....
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Cleveland Guardians With no clear advantage, the spread is a coin flip. Twins' home edge is offset by Guardians' competitiveness. Even money on either side.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
40%
Draw First five innings often depend on starting pitchers, which are unknown. Historically, early innings are tight. Slight lean to draw as neith...
First five innings over 4.5
?
First five innings over 4.5
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
Match winner
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 5/6
Both teams are evenly matched in recent form (3-2 records over last 5) and rest (4 days each), but the Twins play at home where they have a...
The Minnesota Twins have a strong home advantage, with a recent home record of 3 wins and 2 losses, scoring 30 runs and conceding 22 in thei...
Twins show stronger recent scoring (30 runs in last 5) than Guardians (22 runs) despite identical 3-2 records. Both clubs enter with 4 rest...
This prediction is based on general team strength from training data prior to 2026, as specific game-day factors for July 2026 are unavailab...
The Guardians have shown slightly better recent form despite both teams having identical 3-2 records over their last five games. Their pitch...
Both teams have similar recent form (3-2 last 5) and equal rest. The Twins have a slight home field advantage at Target Field. However, with...
Over / Under
Consensusover 4/6
Over the last 5 matches, the Twins scored 30 runs (6.0 per game) and the Guardians 22 (4.4 per game); combined, that averages 10.4 runs per...
Both teams have shown a tendency to score runs in their recent games, with the Twins scoring 30 runs and conceding 22, and the Guardians sco...
Both teams average over 5 runs per game in recent form and ballpark factors at Minnesota typically play neutral to hitter-friendly in July....
Without specific pitching matchups for this 2026 game, the prediction leans on the combined run-scoring and conceding trends from both teams...
Both teams have strong offenses capable of scoring runs, and their recent games have seen a decent number of runs scored. The ballpark in Mi...
Both teams have been scoring well recently (Guardians 22 runs in 5 games, Twins 30). With neither bullpen specified, the trend favors runs....
Spread
ConsensusMinnesota Twins -1.5 2/6
The Twins have a marginal home-field advantage and a +8 run differential (vs Guardians' +3) over the last 5 games, suggesting they are the s...
The Minnesota Twins' home advantage and recent form suggest they are likely to win by at least two runs. Their recent home performance, with...
Guardians have shown ability to stay within one run in recent losses and Twins offensive edge is not large enough to cover -1.5 consistently...
Assuming the Twins can leverage their home advantage and recent offensive strength to secure a win, there's a moderate chance they could win...
While the Guardians are favored to win outright, the margin is expected to be close. However, their recent form and slight offensive edge su...
With no clear advantage, the spread is a coin flip. Twins' home edge is offset by Guardians' competitiveness. Even money on either side.
First 5 innings
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 3/5
Early innings are typically lower-scoring in baseball, particularly when both teams are well-rested and starting pitchers are fresh. While t...
The Minnesota Twins' strong home performance and recent form suggest they are likely to lead after the first five innings. Their recent home...
Minnesota's lineup has posted higher early-inning output historically and the home starter matchup is expected to hold a modest edge. Limite...
Given the lack of specific starting pitcher information for this future game, the Twins' slightly more potent offense in recent form suggest...
First five innings often depend on starting pitchers, which are unknown. Historically, early innings are tight. Slight lean to draw as neith...
First five innings over 4.5
Consensusover 1/1
Both starting pitchers have been decent, but the offenses for both teams tend to start strong. The Guardians' lineup, in particular, has a g...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Minnesota Twins
GPT-4o Mini
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Cleveland Guardians
DeepSeek V3
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Minnesota Twins
Grok 4 Fast
Minnesota Twins
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
4f8c830dce6ceaec…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Jul 8 · 23:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 10440,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-07-08T23:40:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 08 Jul 2026 23:40:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Cleveland Guardians",
"home": "Minnesota Twins"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LWWWL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 22,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 19
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WLWLW",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 30,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 22
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 4,
"home": 4
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 1 source
1 citation captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.