Minnesota TwinsvsLos Angeles Angels
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Minnesota Twins 3/5 models |
over 3/6 models |
Minnesota Twins -1.5 3/6 models |
Minnesota Twins 1/1 models |
Minnesota Twins 4/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
69%
Minnesota Twins |
64%
Under |
58%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
— |
72%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
69%
Minnesota Twins The first five innings are dominated by starting pitchers and early lineup matchups. Minnesota's recent run-scoring form (6 runs/game) combi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
64%
Under Los Angeles has conceded 29 runs in five matches but scored only 11—a sign their pitching is severely compromised. Minnesota averages 6 runs...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Minnesota's 4-1 form and 16-run differential over five games suggest they are the clear favorite, but a 1.5-run spread asks them to win by a...
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Minnesota Twins Minnesota enters on a 4-1 run with strong offensive output (30 runs in 5 matches) and solid defense (14 conceded), while Los Angeles is in f... |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Los Angeles Angels |
55%
over |
60%
Los Angeles Angels |
— |
60%
Los Angeles Angels |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Los Angeles Angels The Angels' starting pitcher has been effective early in games, and the Twins' lineup has struggled against right-handed pitchers in the fir...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have potent offenses, and the weather conditions are expected to be favorable for hitting, suggesting a higher-scoring game.
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Los Angeles Angels The Angels' recent form and favorable matchup against the Twins' right-handed pitcher give them an edge to cover the spread.
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Los Angeles Angels The Los Angeles Angels have a strong starting pitcher matchup and have been performing better recently, while the Minnesota Twins have strug...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
|
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
59%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
over |
58%
home_ -1.5 |
— |
62%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
59%
Minnesota Twins Early-game advantage leans toward the Twins given their current hot streak and Angels' ongoing struggles; bullpen usage later in games is le...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Angels have allowed 29 runs in five games while Twins offense is averaging six runs per contest. Neutral rest and typical summer conditions...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
home_ -1.5 Minnesota's offensive surge and Angels' defensive collapse make a Twins win by two or more runs the likeliest outcome on the run line.
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Minnesota Twins Twins enter with a 4-1 record and strong recent scoring while Angels are winless in their last five. Both clubs have equal rest, but Minneso... |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
— |
55%
Over |
58%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
60%
Minnesota Twins |
65%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over The Twins have averaged 6 runs scored per game in their last five, while the Angels have conceded an average of 5.8 runs per game. This comb...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 Given the significant disparity in recent form, with the Twins winning comfortably and scoring often, they are well-positioned to cover the...
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
60%
Minnesota Twins The Twins' superior recent form and strong offensive production, combined with the Angels' struggles in both scoring and preventing runs, su...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Minnesota Twins Based on the provided recent form, the Minnesota Twins are showing dominant performance with a 4W-1L record, high scoring, and low conceding... |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
56%
Los Angeles Angels |
52%
over |
53%
Los Angeles Angels |
— |
55%
Los Angeles Angels |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
56%
Los Angeles Angels The Minnesota Twins have a stronger starting pitcher in Joe Ryan compared to the Angels' Reid Detmers, who has shown inconsistency. Coupled...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over While the Angels' offense has been weak, the Twins' offense has been very strong, averaging 6 runs per game in their last 5. Additionally, t...
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Los Angeles Angels Given the Twins' strong recent form and potent offense against the Angels' struggling pitching and poor recent results, the Twins are likely...
4 sources cited
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Los Angeles Angels The Minnesota Twins are in significantly better recent form than the Los Angeles Angels, having won 4 of their last 5 games compared to the...
4 sources cited
|
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Over 8.5 |
50%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 |
— |
65%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
58%
Minnesota Twins Early innings favor the Twins' momentum and home crowd, but without confirmed starters, it's a moderate lean. The Angels' recent first-innin...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Target Field plays neutral to slightly hitter-friendly. The Angels have allowed 29 runs in 5 games, but their offense has struggled. The Twi...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Minnesota Twins -1.5 The Twins have been winning convincingly recently, but the Angels have been competitive in losses. Without a known starter edge, the run lin...
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Minnesota Twins The Twins enter on a 4-1 run while the Angels have lost 5 straight. Minnesota's offense has been potent, and despite no specific pitcher inf... |
||||||
First 5 innings
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 3/5
The first five innings are dominated by starting pitchers and early lineup matchups. Minnesota's recent run-scoring form (6 runs/game) combi...
The Angels' starting pitcher has been effective early in games, and the Twins' lineup has struggled against right-handed pitchers in the fir...
Early-game advantage leans toward the Twins given their current hot streak and Angels' ongoing struggles; bullpen usage later in games is le...
The Minnesota Twins have a stronger starting pitcher in Joe Ryan compared to the Angels' Reid Detmers, who has shown inconsistency. Coupled...
Early innings favor the Twins' momentum and home crowd, but without confirmed starters, it's a moderate lean. The Angels' recent first-innin...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
Los Angeles has conceded 29 runs in five matches but scored only 11—a sign their pitching is severely compromised. Minnesota averages 6 runs...
Both teams have potent offenses, and the weather conditions are expected to be favorable for hitting, suggesting a higher-scoring game.
Angels have allowed 29 runs in five games while Twins offense is averaging six runs per contest. Neutral rest and typical summer conditions...
The Twins have averaged 6 runs scored per game in their last five, while the Angels have conceded an average of 5.8 runs per game. This comb...
While the Angels' offense has been weak, the Twins' offense has been very strong, averaging 6 runs per game in their last 5. Additionally, t...
Target Field plays neutral to slightly hitter-friendly. The Angels have allowed 29 runs in 5 games, but their offense has struggled. The Twi...
Spread
ConsensusMinnesota Twins -1.5 3/6
Minnesota's 4-1 form and 16-run differential over five games suggest they are the clear favorite, but a 1.5-run spread asks them to win by a...
The Angels' recent form and favorable matchup against the Twins' right-handed pitcher give them an edge to cover the spread.
Minnesota's offensive surge and Angels' defensive collapse make a Twins win by two or more runs the likeliest outcome on the run line.
Given the significant disparity in recent form, with the Twins winning comfortably and scoring often, they are well-positioned to cover the...
Given the Twins' strong recent form and potent offense against the Angels' struggling pitching and poor recent results, the Twins are likely...
The Twins have been winning convincingly recently, but the Angels have been competitive in losses. Without a known starter edge, the run lin...
First five innings h2h
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 1/1
The Twins' superior recent form and strong offensive production, combined with the Angels' struggles in both scoring and preventing runs, su...
Match winner
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 4/6
Minnesota enters on a 4-1 run with strong offensive output (30 runs in 5 matches) and solid defense (14 conceded), while Los Angeles is in f...
The Los Angeles Angels have a strong starting pitcher matchup and have been performing better recently, while the Minnesota Twins have strug...
Twins enter with a 4-1 record and strong recent scoring while Angels are winless in their last five. Both clubs have equal rest, but Minneso...
Based on the provided recent form, the Minnesota Twins are showing dominant performance with a 4W-1L record, high scoring, and low conceding...
The Minnesota Twins are in significantly better recent form than the Los Angeles Angels, having won 4 of their last 5 games compared to the...
The Twins enter on a 4-1 run while the Angels have lost 5 straight. Minnesota's offense has been potent, and despite no specific pitcher inf...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Minnesota Twins
DeepSeek V3
Minnesota Twins
Grok 4 Fast
Minnesota Twins
GPT-4o Mini
Los Angeles Angels
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Los Angeles Angels
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
fd632dc324348283…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Jul 11 · 18:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 11623,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-07-11T18:10:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 11 Jul 2026 18:10:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Los Angeles Angels",
"home": "Minnesota Twins"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LLLLL",
"record": "0W-0D-5L",
"scored": 11,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 29
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WWWLW",
"record": "4W-0D-1L",
"scored": 30,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 14
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 3,
"home": 3
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
4 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.