Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 2–10
St.Louis Cardinals logo

St.Louis CardinalsvsMilwaukee Brewers

Milwaukee Brewers logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final2–10 Locked 28picks · 18 graded
Recap Consensus missed

St.Louis Cardinals 2–10 Milwaukee Brewers

5 of 7 AIs leaned St.Louis Cardinals — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
St.Louis Cardinals 5/7
Correct calls
2/7
Final
2–10

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
St.Louis Cardinals 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% St.Louis Cardinals L

St. Louis has superior recent form (4-1 in last 5, +21 run differential) and holds a 4-day rest advantage over Milwaukee's 3 days, positioni...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Milwaukee Brewers W

Jacob Misiorowski is listed as Milwaukee's starter by MLB and has been an elite season-long run suppressor (sub-1.50 ERA in previews), while...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Milwaukee Brewers W

The Brewers have shown strong recent form with four wins in their last five games, scoring 23 runs and conceding 17. The Cardinals have also...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% St.Louis Cardinals L

Both clubs enter with identical 4-1 records over their last five games, but the Cardinals enjoy an extra rest day and home-field advantage a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% St.Louis Cardinals L

The St.Louis Cardinals show superior recent offensive form, scoring significantly more runs in their last five games compared to the Brewers...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% St.Louis Cardinals L

The St. Louis Cardinals have superior recent form and a better scoring record over their last 5 games. While both teams have had similar rec...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% St.Louis Cardinals L

The Cardinals have superior offensive form (36 runs last 5 games) and home-field advantage. The Brewers' pitching depth is uncertain with no...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
St.Louis Cardinals -1.5 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% St.Louis Cardinals -1.5 L

St. Louis' superior run differential (+21 vs Milwaukee's +6 in last five games) and home-field advantage support a 1.5-run spread favoring t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 52% Milwaukee Brewers -1.5 W

Given Misiorowski's quality and the Cardinals' starter uncertainty (TBD / rehab spot), the Brewers have a reasonable chance to win by multip...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Milwaukee Brewers W

The Brewers' recent form and slightly better scoring record suggest they are more likely to win by at least two runs, making them a good pic...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% St.Louis Cardinals

Home team plus extra rest supports a modest run-line lean toward St. Louis. Historical divisional splits favor the Cardinals at home. Traini...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% St.Louis Cardinals -1 L

Considering the St.Louis Cardinals' potent offense and slightly better defense demonstrated in their recent form, they are well-positioned t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Milwaukee Brewers W

While the Cardinals are favored in the head-to-head, the Brewers' recent form, despite conceding more runs, shows a winning trend. Given the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 45% St.Louis Cardinals -1.5 L

The Cardinals are projected to win but by a narrow margin due to baseball's unpredictability. Covering a 1.5-run spread is less likely than...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Over 8.5 W

The combined offensive output in the past five games strongly supports Over 8.5: St. Louis and Milwaukee have scored 59 runs combined across...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% under L

Misiorowski's season-long run prevention (listed as the Brewers' starter on MLB) materially reduces scoring risk; several previews (Tony's,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over W

Both teams have demonstrated strong offensive performances recently, with the Brewers scoring 23 runs and the Cardinals scoring 36 in their...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% over

Recent scoring rates are elevated for both sides (home averaging 7.2 runs per game, away 4.6). July weather in St. Louis typically favors hi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 95% Over 2.5 W

A total line of 2.5 runs in baseball is exceptionally low, making the 'Over' a near certainty. Both teams have shown strong offensive form r...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% over W

Both teams have shown strong offensive capabilities with high scoring in their recent games. The Cardinals' recent scoring is particularly h...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Over 8.5

Both teams have been scoring heavily recently (Brewers 23 runs, Cardinals 36 in last 5), and Busch Stadium is neutral but these lineups are...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Milwaukee Brewers 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 59% Over 4.5

Early-inning scoring trends favor the Over: St. Louis is averaging 7.2 runs per game in recent form, and even if only 65% of runs come in th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Milwaukee Brewers

Misiorowski's ability to miss barrels and induce weak contact (season-long elite metrics cited in previews) makes Milwaukee likelier to lead...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Milwaukee Brewers

The Brewers' recent form and slightly better scoring record suggest they are more likely to lead after the first five innings, making them a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% St.Louis Cardinals

Early-game edges mirror the full-game lean, with home team and rest factors carrying extra weight before bullpens enter. Training data throu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% St.Louis Cardinals Win

While specific starting pitcher matchups are unavailable, the Cardinals' recent offensive power combined with home-field advantage gives the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Milwaukee Brewers

The Brewers have a slightly better recent performance in terms of winning games, which can translate to early leads. While the Cardinals' of...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 50% St.Louis Cardinals

Home team often has an early advantage with last at-bats. Cardinals' recent form suggests they can score early. Starting pitcher unknown mak...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Milwaukee Brewers

62
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

St.Louis Cardinals

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

St.Louis Cardinals

58
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Milwaukee Brewers

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

St.Louis Cardinals

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

St.Louis Cardinals

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

St.Louis Cardinals

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1058–806 · 57%
-609.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 694–590 · 54%
-369.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1132–1113 · 50%
-927.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 743–746 · 50%
-504.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1109–1141 · 49%
-832.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 878–934 · 48%
-732.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 51d52f9538d5d60a…
Kickoff
Tue, Jul 7 · 23:45 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 10181,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-07T23:45:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Tue, 07 Jul 2026 23:45:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Milwaukee Brewers",
        "home": "St.Louis Cardinals"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "WLWWW",
            "record": "4W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 23,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 17
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WWLWW",
            "record": "4W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 36,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 15
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 3,
            "home": 4
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →