Hurricanes vs Chiefs
Final: 60 – 5
Hurricanes 60–5 Chiefs
6 of 7 AIs leaned Hurricanes — and reality agreed.
- AI lean
- Hurricanes 6/7
- Correct calls
- 6/7
- Final
- 60–5
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
23b8e51722eb1474…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Jun 20 · 07:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 1. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 1, in this order): h2h
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 5727,
"sport": "rugby",
"venue": null,
"league": "Super Rugby",
"starts_at": "2026-06-20T07:05:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 20 Jun 2026 07:05:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Chiefs",
"home": "Hurricanes"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-20T05:45:03+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
AI predictions
1 markets · 7 models picked
Who picked what
16 models × 1 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 1 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 1 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 1 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 1 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Hurricanes
W
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Hurricanes As of my training data (through September 2024), the Hurricanes and Chiefs are both competitive Super Rugby franchises. Without access to li... |
||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 1 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
58%
Hurricanes
W
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Hurricanes The Hurricanes have been the tournament's most explosive attacking side (100 tries this season) and arrive with a settled, largely unchanged...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
|
||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Hurricanes
W
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Hurricanes The Hurricanes have demonstrated strong form, including a decisive 57-21 victory over the Blues in the semi-finals. Their home advantage at...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
|
||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 1 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 1 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
Hurricanes
W
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Hurricanes Hurricanes hold a strong historical home record against the Chiefs in Super Rugby, often exploiting set-piece and attacking width advantages... |
||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 1 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 1 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Hurricanes
W
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Hurricanes This prediction is based solely on my training data up to its last update, as no live access is available for this future event in 2026. His... |
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Chiefs
L
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chiefs Based on training data, the Chiefs have historically held a slight edge over the Hurricanes in Super Rugby encounters. While specific recent... |
||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Hurricanes
W
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Hurricanes Based on training data through October 2025, the Hurricanes have strong home form and a historically competitive edge at home against the Ch... |
||
|
Consensus |
Hurricanes 6/7 |
|
Match winner
ConsensusHurricanes 6/7
As of my training data (through September 2024), the Hurricanes and Chiefs are both competitive Super Rugby franchises. Without access to li...
The Hurricanes have been the tournament's most explosive attacking side (100 tries this season) and arrive with a settled, largely unchanged...
The Hurricanes have demonstrated strong form, including a decisive 57-21 victory over the Blues in the semi-finals. Their home advantage at...
Hurricanes hold a strong historical home record against the Chiefs in Super Rugby, often exploiting set-piece and attacking width advantages...
This prediction is based solely on my training data up to its last update, as no live access is available for this future event in 2026. His...
Based on training data, the Chiefs have historically held a slight edge over the Hurricanes in Super Rugby encounters. While specific recent...
Based on training data through October 2025, the Hurricanes have strong home form and a historically competitive edge at home against the Ch...
Ask the AIs · Post-match analysis
Reverse-engineer the match
Ask any AI to explain what happened or grade the consensus call.
Sign in to ask the AIs about this match. Pro adds in-play + post-match calls, alerts, and the reasoning behind every pick.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
12 tool calls · 6 sources
6 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
1 tool call · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.