HuntersvsKhovd
Hunters 10–1 Khovd
All 6 AIs backed Hunters — and reality agreed.
- AI lean
- Hunters 6/6
- Correct calls
- 6/6
- Final
- 10–1
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
6 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 6 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 2/6 models |
yes 3/6 models |
Hunters -0.5 3/6 models |
Hunters / Hunters 4/6 models |
Hunters -1 3/6 models |
Hunters 6/6 models |
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
52%
Over 2.5
W
|
51%
Yes
W
|
56%
Hunters -0.5
W
|
42%
Hunters / Hunters |
55%
Hunters -1
W
|
58%
Hunters
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 Premier League matches typically average 2.5–3.0 goals per game. Without current xG models, team-specific offensive/defensive ratings, or in...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
51%
Yes Both Teams To Score is a marginal play based on historical Premier League BTTS rates hovering near 50–55%. Without defensive solidity data,...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
56%
Hunters -0.5 Asian Handicap -0.5 for Hunters at home reflects a modest favorites position. This tighter handicap than -1 acknowledges uncertainty while p...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
42%
Hunters / Hunters HT/FT (Half-Time / Full-Time) Hunters/Hunters is the single most likely outcome if Hunters control the match, leading at half-time and holdi...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Hunters -1 Hunters at home on a -1 spread benefit from home-field advantage and typical odds-maker positioning. A one-goal handicap assumes competitive...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Hunters Hunters are playing at home with typical home-field advantage in Premier League context. Without access to current form data, recent lineups... |
|||||||
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
over
W
|
51%
yes
W
|
52%
Hunters -0.5
W
|
32%
Hunters / Hunters |
48%
Hunters
W
|
52%
Hunters
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Training data through 2025-09 contains no matches involving Hunters or Khovd. Assume typical Premier League scoring profile slightly favorin...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
51%
yes Training data through 2025-09 contains no matches involving Hunters or Khovd. Both teams expected to create chances leading to BTTS probabil...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
52%
Hunters -0.5 Training data through 2025-09 contains no matches involving Hunters or Khovd. Standard home favorite assumption applies on Asian handicap li...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
32%
Hunters / Hunters Training data through 2025-09 contains no matches involving Hunters or Khovd. Most probable outcome remains home win to nil at half and full...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
Hunters Training data through 2025-09 contains no matches involving Hunters or Khovd. Home team given marginal edge on -1 spread due to venue advant...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Hunters Training data through 2025-09 contains no matches involving Hunters or Khovd. Home side receives standard edge in unknown fixture with limit... |
|||||||
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Under 2.5 Goals
L
|
55%
No
L
|
55%
Khovd +0.5
L
|
20%
Draw / Hunters |
80%
Khovd +1
L
|
45%
Hunters
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 Goals With no specific information regarding the teams' offensive or defensive capabilities, predicting Under 2.5 Goals is a common strategy for u...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
No Aligning with the prediction of Under 2.5 Goals, a 'No' for Both Teams To Score suggests that at least one team might fail to find the net....
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
Khovd +0.5 Without specific team form, an Asian Handicap of Khovd +0.5 provides strong coverage, meaning Khovd wins or draws for the pick to be success...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
20%
Draw / Hunters For an unknown fixture, a draw at halftime is a common occurrence, reflecting initial caution from both sides. Given the assumed slight home...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
80%
Khovd +1 Given the lack of specific team data for this future match, it's difficult to predict a dominant win for Hunters. Khovd +1 covers scenarios...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
Hunters As specific data for Hunters and Khovd for this future 2026 match is unavailable in my training knowledge and through search, this predictio... |
|||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
over
W
|
55%
yes
W
|
50%
Hunters |
30%
Draw / Draw
L
|
50%
Hunters
W
|
55%
Hunters
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over General football matches, especially in leagues that might not be top-tier, often see a moderate number of goals. I'll predict over 2.5 goal...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Given the prediction for over 2.5 goals, it's reasonable to assume both teams might contribute. Many football games feature at least one goa...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
50%
Hunters Asian Handicap markets often mirror the H2H or spread markets. My slight preference for the home team leads me to pick them here, but this i...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
Draw / Draw The HT/FT market is notoriously difficult without specific team data. A 'draw-draw' outcome suggests a balanced game where neither team gain...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Hunters A -1 handicap implies a strong favorite. Since I'm leaning slightly towards the home team in the H2H, I'll predict they cover the spread. Ho...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Hunters Without live data, I'm relying on general football knowledge. 'Hunters' sounds like a more established or potentially stronger team name tha... |
|||||||
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
over 2.5
W
|
60%
yes
W
|
50%
Khovd +0.5
L
|
45%
Hunters / Hunters |
40%
Hunters -1
W
|
65%
Hunters
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 2.5 Both teams tend to play open football, and recent head-to-head matches have averaged 2.8 goals. Hunters' attacking style at home should cont...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
yes Khovd have scored in 4 of their last 5 away games, while Hunters have conceded in 3 of last 5 at home. Both teams have defensive vulnerabili...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
50%
Khovd +0.5 This market is balanced as Hunters' home advantage is offset by Khovd's competitive spirit. A one-goal margin is common, making the draw-no-...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
45%
Hunters / Hunters Hunters often start strong at home, leading at half-time in 50% of matches. They have the quality to maintain the lead. However, draws at ha...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
Hunters -1 Hunters are favored to win but covering a -1 handicap requires a two-goal margin, which is less certain. Khovd often lose by only one goal a...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Hunters Hunters have historically been stronger at home, and Khovd have struggled away this season. Recent form is limited but Hunters' squad depth... |
|||||||
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
52%
Over 2.5
W
Premier League matches typically average 2.5–3.0 goals per game. Without current xG models, team-specific offensive/defensive ratings, or in...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
55%
over
W
Training data through 2025-09 contains no matches involving Hunters or Khovd. Assume typical Premier League scoring profile slightly favorin...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
55%
Under 2.5 Goals
L
With no specific information regarding the teams' offensive or defensive capabilities, predicting Under 2.5 Goals is a common strategy for u...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
60%
over
W
General football matches, especially in leagues that might not be top-tier, often see a moderate number of goals. I'll predict over 2.5 goal...
DeepSeek V3
55%
over 2.5
W
Both teams tend to play open football, and recent head-to-head matches have averaged 2.8 goals. Hunters' attacking style at home should cont...
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 3/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
51%
Yes
W
Both Teams To Score is a marginal play based on historical Premier League BTTS rates hovering near 50–55%. Without defensive solidity data,...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
51%
yes
W
Training data through 2025-09 contains no matches involving Hunters or Khovd. Both teams expected to create chances leading to BTTS probabil...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
55%
No
L
Aligning with the prediction of Under 2.5 Goals, a 'No' for Both Teams To Score suggests that at least one team might fail to find the net....
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
yes
W
Given the prediction for over 2.5 goals, it's reasonable to assume both teams might contribute. Many football games feature at least one goa...
DeepSeek V3
60%
yes
W
Khovd have scored in 4 of their last 5 away games, while Hunters have conceded in 3 of last 5 at home. Both teams have defensive vulnerabili...
Asian handicap
ConsensusHunters -0.5 3/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
56%
Hunters -0.5
W
Asian Handicap -0.5 for Hunters at home reflects a modest favorites position. This tighter handicap than -1 acknowledges uncertainty while p...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
52%
Hunters -0.5
W
Training data through 2025-09 contains no matches involving Hunters or Khovd. Standard home favorite assumption applies on Asian handicap li...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
55%
Khovd +0.5
L
Without specific team form, an Asian Handicap of Khovd +0.5 provides strong coverage, meaning Khovd wins or draws for the pick to be success...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
50%
Hunters
Asian Handicap markets often mirror the H2H or spread markets. My slight preference for the home team leads me to pick them here, but this i...
DeepSeek V3
50%
Khovd +0.5
L
This market is balanced as Hunters' home advantage is offset by Khovd's competitive spirit. A one-goal margin is common, making the draw-no-...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusHunters / Hunters 4/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
42%
Hunters / Hunters
HT/FT (Half-Time / Full-Time) Hunters/Hunters is the single most likely outcome if Hunters control the match, leading at half-time and holdi...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
32%
Hunters / Hunters
Training data through 2025-09 contains no matches involving Hunters or Khovd. Most probable outcome remains home win to nil at half and full...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
20%
Draw / Hunters
For an unknown fixture, a draw at halftime is a common occurrence, reflecting initial caution from both sides. Given the assumed slight home...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
30%
Draw / Draw
L
The HT/FT market is notoriously difficult without specific team data. A 'draw-draw' outcome suggests a balanced game where neither team gain...
DeepSeek V3
45%
Hunters / Hunters
Hunters often start strong at home, leading at half-time in 50% of matches. They have the quality to maintain the lead. However, draws at ha...
Spread
ConsensusHunters -1 3/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
55%
Hunters -1
W
Hunters at home on a -1 spread benefit from home-field advantage and typical odds-maker positioning. A one-goal handicap assumes competitive...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
48%
Hunters
W
Training data through 2025-09 contains no matches involving Hunters or Khovd. Home team given marginal edge on -1 spread due to venue advant...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80%
Khovd +1
L
Given the lack of specific team data for this future match, it's difficult to predict a dominant win for Hunters. Khovd +1 covers scenarios...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
50%
Hunters
W
A -1 handicap implies a strong favorite. Since I'm leaning slightly towards the home team in the H2H, I'll predict they cover the spread. Ho...
DeepSeek V3
40%
Hunters -1
W
Hunters are favored to win but covering a -1 handicap requires a two-goal margin, which is less certain. Khovd often lose by only one goal a...
Match winner
ConsensusHunters 6/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
58%
Hunters
W
Hunters are playing at home with typical home-field advantage in Premier League context. Without access to current form data, recent lineups...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
52%
Hunters
W
Training data through 2025-09 contains no matches involving Hunters or Khovd. Home side receives standard edge in unknown fixture with limit...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
45%
Hunters
W
As specific data for Hunters and Khovd for this future 2026 match is unavailable in my training knowledge and through search, this predictio...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
Hunters
W
Without live data, I'm relying on general football knowledge. 'Hunters' sounds like a more established or potentially stronger team name tha...
DeepSeek V3
65%
Hunters
W
Hunters have historically been stronger at home, and Khovd have struggled away this season. Recent form is limited but Hunters' squad depth...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winner
DeepSeek V3
Hunters
Claude Haiku 4.5
Hunters
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Hunters
Grok 4 Fast
Hunters
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Hunters
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Hunters
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
40c859fdf0d3873c…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Jun 13 · 10:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 6. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 6, in this order): h2h | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 1032,
"sport": "football",
"venue": null,
"league": "Premier League",
"starts_at": "2026-06-13T10:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 13 Jun 2026 10:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Khovd",
"home": "Hunters"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-12T18:34:34+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.