Cincinnati RedsvsChicago Cubs
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Chicago Cubs 4/6 models |
over 3/6 models |
Chicago Cubs -1.5 2/6 models |
Chicago Cubs 4/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Chicago Cubs |
54%
Over 8.5 |
52%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 |
56%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Chicago Cubs Chicago enters with superior recent form (3W-2L vs Cincinnati's 2W-3L over the last 5), and a +6 run differential (+35 scored, -29 conceded)...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Over 8.5 Chicago's strong offensive recent form (35 runs in last 5 matches, 7 per game average) and Cincinnati's moderate pitching vulnerability (19...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 The Cubs' superior recent form and run differential support a close but favourable margin. Cincinnati's slight home-field advantage is typic...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
56%
Chicago Cubs Early-game advantage often correlates with overall offensive form and starter quality. The Cubs' recent offensive consistency (35 runs, 7/ga... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Cincinnati Reds |
60%
over |
55%
Cincinnati Reds |
55%
Cincinnati Reds |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Cincinnati Reds The Cincinnati Reds have a slight edge over the Chicago Cubs, with a 55% chance of winning. This is based on their recent form, home-field a...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over The over 9.5 total runs is favored with a 60% chance. Both teams have shown inconsistent pitching performances recently, leading to higher-s...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Cincinnati Reds The Cincinnati Reds are expected to cover the -1.5 spread with a 55% chance. Their home-field advantage and the Cubs' struggles on the road...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Cincinnati Reds The Cincinnati Reds are favored to lead after the first five innings with a 55% chance. Their starting pitcher is expected to have a strong...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Chicago Cubs |
52%
over |
51%
Chicago Cubs |
50%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Chicago Cubs Cubs posted a stronger recent scoring rate (7.0 runs per game) than the Reds in the supplied form data. Both clubs enter with four rest days...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Cubs recent games have been high-scoring while Reds offense remains suppressed. Neutral rest and typical July Great American Ball Park condi...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Chicago Cubs Cubs hold the edge in run differential over the last five outings. Road favorites in this matchup have covered the run line at a slight plus...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
50%
Chicago Cubs Cubs have outscored opponents early in recent form. Without confirmed 2026 starters, rely on season-long trends showing Cubs stronger in the... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Chicago Cubs |
56%
Over |
55%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 |
57%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Chicago Cubs Based on the provided recent form, the Chicago Cubs have a slightly better record (3W-2L) compared to the Cincinnati Reds (2W-3L). Without s...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
56%
Over The Chicago Cubs have scored an average of 7 runs per game in their last five, while the Cincinnati Reds averaged 3.2 runs per game. Combini...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Chicago Cubs -1.5 Aligning with the head-to-head prediction, the Chicago Cubs' slightly better recent form (3W-2L) suggests they are more likely to win by at...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
57%
Chicago Cubs The first five innings heavily depend on starting pitching, which is unknown here. However, given the Chicago Cubs' superior recent scoring... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
60%
over |
53%
Chicago Cubs |
54%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs The Cubs and Reds are evenly matched in terms of recent form and season records. However, the Cubs have a slightly better starting pitcher m...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over The weather forecast for Cincinnati on July 11th predicts clear skies, warm temperatures, and wind blowing out towards center field. This co...
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Chicago Cubs While the game is expected to be close, the Cubs have a slight edge due to their more reliable starting pitching and a bullpen that generall...
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
Chicago Cubs The Cubs' ability to get strong starts from their pitchers is a key factor in their early game performance. Combined with a slightly more po...
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Cincinnati Reds |
55%
over 8.5 |
30%
Cincinnati Reds -1.5 |
55%
Cincinnati Reds |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Cincinnati Reds Cincinnati has slight home-field advantage in a matchup where both teams have similar recent form. The Cubs have been scoring well but the R...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 8.5 Both teams have shown offensive capability recently, with Cubs averaging 7 runs per game over last 5 and Reds 3.2. Great American Ball Park...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
30%
Cincinnati Reds -1.5 Cubs have been strong offensively and the game is expected to be close. The Reds are unlikely to win by multiple runs given the Cubs' scorin...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Cincinnati Reds Similar to full game, but home team often has an early advantage. Starting pitchers and early lineup production should give Reds a slight ed... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusChicago Cubs 4/6
Chicago enters with superior recent form (3W-2L vs Cincinnati's 2W-3L over the last 5), and a +6 run differential (+35 scored, -29 conceded)...
The Cincinnati Reds have a slight edge over the Chicago Cubs, with a 55% chance of winning. This is based on their recent form, home-field a...
Cubs posted a stronger recent scoring rate (7.0 runs per game) than the Reds in the supplied form data. Both clubs enter with four rest days...
Based on the provided recent form, the Chicago Cubs have a slightly better record (3W-2L) compared to the Cincinnati Reds (2W-3L). Without s...
The Cubs and Reds are evenly matched in terms of recent form and season records. However, the Cubs have a slightly better starting pitcher m...
Cincinnati has slight home-field advantage in a matchup where both teams have similar recent form. The Cubs have been scoring well but the R...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
Chicago's strong offensive recent form (35 runs in last 5 matches, 7 per game average) and Cincinnati's moderate pitching vulnerability (19...
The over 9.5 total runs is favored with a 60% chance. Both teams have shown inconsistent pitching performances recently, leading to higher-s...
Cubs recent games have been high-scoring while Reds offense remains suppressed. Neutral rest and typical July Great American Ball Park condi...
The Chicago Cubs have scored an average of 7 runs per game in their last five, while the Cincinnati Reds averaged 3.2 runs per game. Combini...
The weather forecast for Cincinnati on July 11th predicts clear skies, warm temperatures, and wind blowing out towards center field. This co...
Both teams have shown offensive capability recently, with Cubs averaging 7 runs per game over last 5 and Reds 3.2. Great American Ball Park...
Spread
ConsensusChicago Cubs -1.5 2/6
The Cubs' superior recent form and run differential support a close but favourable margin. Cincinnati's slight home-field advantage is typic...
The Cincinnati Reds are expected to cover the -1.5 spread with a 55% chance. Their home-field advantage and the Cubs' struggles on the road...
Cubs hold the edge in run differential over the last five outings. Road favorites in this matchup have covered the run line at a slight plus...
Aligning with the head-to-head prediction, the Chicago Cubs' slightly better recent form (3W-2L) suggests they are more likely to win by at...
While the game is expected to be close, the Cubs have a slight edge due to their more reliable starting pitching and a bullpen that generall...
Cubs have been strong offensively and the game is expected to be close. The Reds are unlikely to win by multiple runs given the Cubs' scorin...
First 5 innings
ConsensusChicago Cubs 4/6
Early-game advantage often correlates with overall offensive form and starter quality. The Cubs' recent offensive consistency (35 runs, 7/ga...
The Cincinnati Reds are favored to lead after the first five innings with a 55% chance. Their starting pitcher is expected to have a strong...
Cubs have outscored opponents early in recent form. Without confirmed 2026 starters, rely on season-long trends showing Cubs stronger in the...
The first five innings heavily depend on starting pitching, which is unknown here. However, given the Chicago Cubs' superior recent scoring...
The Cubs' ability to get strong starts from their pitchers is a key factor in their early game performance. Combined with a slightly more po...
Similar to full game, but home team often has an early advantage. Starting pitchers and early lineup production should give Reds a slight ed...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Chicago Cubs
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Chicago Cubs
GPT-4o Mini
Cincinnati Reds
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Chicago Cubs
DeepSeek V3
Cincinnati Reds
Grok 4 Fast
Chicago Cubs
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
7b662e570908871b…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Jul 11 · 23:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 11649,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-07-11T23:10:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 11 Jul 2026 23:10:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Chicago Cubs",
"home": "Cincinnati Reds"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWLLW",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 35,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 29
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LWLLW",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 16,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 19
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 4,
"home": 4
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
4 tool calls · 1 source
1 citation captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.