Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Great American Ball Park
Live 0–0
Cincinnati Reds logo

Cincinnati RedsvsChicago Cubs

Chicago Cubs logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks AIs split

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Chicago Cubs

Chicago enters with superior recent form (3W-2L vs Cincinnati's 2W-3L over the last 5), and a +6 run differential (+35 scored, -29 conceded)...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% Cincinnati Reds

MLB's probable-starters list shows Javier Assad (CHC) facing Nick Lodolo (CIN) on July 11; Lodolo has had a mixed 2026 with a recent quality...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Cincinnati Reds

The Cincinnati Reds have a slight edge over the Chicago Cubs, with a 55% chance of winning. This is based on their recent form, home-field a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Chicago Cubs

Cubs posted a stronger recent scoring rate (7.0 runs per game) than the Reds in the supplied form data. Both clubs enter with four rest days...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Chicago Cubs

Based on the provided recent form, the Chicago Cubs have a slightly better record (3W-2L) compared to the Cincinnati Reds (2W-3L). Without s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs and Reds are evenly matched in terms of recent form and season records. However, the Cubs have a slightly better starting pitcher m...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Cincinnati Reds

Cincinnati has slight home-field advantage in a matchup where both teams have similar recent form. The Cubs have been scoring well but the R...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Bookmaker line: Chicago Cubs 57%

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Over 8.5

Chicago's strong offensive recent form (35 runs in last 5 matches, 7 per game average) and Cincinnati's moderate pitching vulnerability (19...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% over

Great American Ball Park grades as a hitter-friendly venue in 2026, increasing the baseline run expectation; both probable starters carry mi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over

The over 9.5 total runs is favored with a 60% chance. Both teams have shown inconsistent pitching performances recently, leading to higher-s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Cubs recent games have been high-scoring while Reds offense remains suppressed. Neutral rest and typical July Great American Ball Park condi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 56% Over

The Chicago Cubs have scored an average of 7 runs per game in their last five, while the Cincinnati Reds averaged 3.2 runs per game. Combini...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over

The weather forecast for Cincinnati on July 11th predicts clear skies, warm temperatures, and wind blowing out towards center field. This co...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% over 8.5

Both teams have shown offensive capability recently, with Cubs averaging 7 runs per game over last 5 and Reds 3.2. Great American Ball Park...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Bookmaker line: 9.5 · Over 51%

Spread

Consensus
Chicago Cubs -1.5 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Chicago Cubs -1.5

The Cubs' superior recent form and run differential support a close but favourable margin. Cincinnati's slight home-field advantage is typic...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 52% home_cover

Home-team run-line coverage is achievable here because Great American Ball Park amplifies the Reds' run-scoring potential and Lodolo has sho...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Cincinnati Reds

The Cincinnati Reds are expected to cover the -1.5 spread with a 55% chance. Their home-field advantage and the Cubs' struggles on the road...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Chicago Cubs

Cubs hold the edge in run differential over the last five outings. Road favorites in this matchup have covered the run line at a slight plus...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Chicago Cubs -1.5

Aligning with the head-to-head prediction, the Chicago Cubs' slightly better recent form (3W-2L) suggests they are more likely to win by at...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Chicago Cubs

While the game is expected to be close, the Cubs have a slight edge due to their more reliable starting pitching and a bullpen that generall...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 30% Cincinnati Reds -1.5

Cubs have been strong offensively and the game is expected to be close. The Reds are unlikely to win by multiple runs given the Cubs' scorin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Chicago Cubs

Early-game advantage often correlates with overall offensive form and starter quality. The Cubs' recent offensive consistency (35 runs, 7/ga...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 50% Chicago Cubs

First-five outcomes lean toward the Cubs because Lodolo (LHP) starts for Cincinnati and the Cubs' projected lineup is heavy with right-hande...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Cincinnati Reds

The Cincinnati Reds are favored to lead after the first five innings with a 55% chance. Their starting pitcher is expected to have a strong...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 1 source cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 50% Chicago Cubs

Cubs have outscored opponents early in recent form. Without confirmed 2026 starters, rely on season-long trends showing Cubs stronger in the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 57% Chicago Cubs

The first five innings heavily depend on starting pitching, which is unknown here. However, given the Chicago Cubs' superior recent scoring...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs' ability to get strong starts from their pitchers is a key factor in their early game performance. Combined with a slightly more po...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Cincinnati Reds

Similar to full game, but home team often has an early advantage. Starting pitchers and early lineup production should give Reds a slight ed...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Chicago Cubs

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Chicago Cubs

58
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Cincinnati Reds

57
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Cincinnati Reds

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Chicago Cubs

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Cincinnati Reds

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Chicago Cubs

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1174–953 · 55%
-756.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 694–590 · 54%
-369.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 888–889 · 50%
-647.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1254–1273 · 50%
-1,087.7u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1251–1309 · 49%
-1,000.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1024–1101 · 48%
-938.0u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 999–1087 · 48%
-885.8u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Bookmaker odds

1 books · sharp books pinned · best price highlighted

Book Cincinnati Reds Draw Chicago Cubs
Draftkings 2.08 — 1.77
Book Line Over Under
Draftkings 9.0 1.85 1.98
Book Cincinnati Reds Chicago Cubs

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 7b662e570908871b…
Kickoff
Sat, Jul 11 · 23:10 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 11649,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-11T23:10:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sat, 11 Jul 2026 23:10:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Chicago Cubs",
        "home": "Cincinnati Reds"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "WWLLW",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 35,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 29
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "LWLLW",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 16,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 19
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 4,
            "home": 4
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →