Al NejmehvsAl Ahed
Al Nejmeh 1–0 Al Ahed
All 6 AIs backed Al Nejmeh — and reality agreed.
- AI lean
- Al Nejmeh 6/6
- Correct calls
- 6/6
- Final
- 1–0
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
6 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 6 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Al Ahed -1 2/5 models |
Al Nejmeh / Al Nejmeh 4/5 models |
Al Nejmeh 6/6 models |
Al Nejmeh -0.25 5/5 models |
No 5/5 models |
Under 2.5 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
35%
Al Nejmeh -1
~3.85
|
40%
Al Nejmeh / Al Nejmeh |
58%
Al Nejmeh
W
|
54%
Al Nejmeh -0.25
W
|
68%
No
~1.25
W
|
62%
Under 2.5
~1.57
W
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
35%
Al Nejmeh -1 Home -1 (giving away 1 goal) is priced at 4.4–6.1, extremely unfavourable odds suggesting low probability of a home win by 2+ goals. Away -1...
Odds: 3.85
Edge: +9.0%
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
40%
Al Nejmeh / Al Nejmeh Half-time/Full-time requires both correct intervals. Home-Home (home leading at HT and FT) is the most probable outcome given home h2h advan...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Al Nejmeh Al Nejmeh is priced as the favourite (1.97–1.98 across bookmakers), suggesting home advantage and stronger current standing in Lebanese foot...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
54%
Al Nejmeh -0.25 Asian handicap -0.25 (half-goal) effectively splits draws and slight home wins. Home -0.25 is priced at 1.82–1.99; Away -0.25 at 1.60–1.82....
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
68%
No Both Teams to Score (Yes) is priced at 3.66, while No is priced at 1.22. The short odds on No indicate strong market consensus that at least...
Odds: 1.25
Edge: -12.0%
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Under 2.5 Across bookmakers, Under 2.5 is priced between 1.53–1.60, consistently shorter than Over 2.5 (2.17–2.18). This suggests a betting market con...
Odds: 1.57
Edge: -1.7%
|
|||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
60%
Al Nejmeh -0.25
~1.52
W
|
55%
Al Nejmeh / Draw
L
|
60%
Al Nejmeh
W
|
60%
Al Nejmeh -0.25
W
|
60%
No
~1.18
W
|
55%
Under 2.5
~1.62
W
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Al Nejmeh -0.25 Al Nejmeh has a strong home advantage, having won 5 of the last 10 encounters against Al Ahed, with 3 draws and 2 losses. Their recent form...
Odds: 1.52
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
55%
Al Nejmeh / Draw Al Nejmeh has a strong home advantage, having won 5 of the last 10 encounters against Al Ahed, with 3 draws and 2 losses. Their recent form...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Al Nejmeh Al Nejmeh has a strong home advantage, having won 5 of the last 10 encounters against Al Ahed, with 3 draws and 2 losses. Their recent form...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
60%
Al Nejmeh -0.25 Al Nejmeh has a strong home advantage, having won 5 of the last 10 encounters against Al Ahed, with 3 draws and 2 losses. Their recent form...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
No Both teams have shown a tendency for matches with under 2.5 goals in their recent form. Al Nejmeh has had 3 out of 6 matches with over 2.5 g...
Odds: 1.18
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 In their last 6 matches, Al Nejmeh has averaged 2.17 total goals per game, with 3 out of 6 matches having over 2.5 goals. Al Ahed has averag...
Odds: 1.62
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
|
|||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
Al Ahed -1
~1.58
L
|
38%
Al Nejmeh / Al Nejmeh |
52%
Al Nejmeh
W
|
53%
Al Nejmeh -0.25
W
|
68%
No
~1.18
W
|
58%
Under 2.5
~1.62
W
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Al Ahed -1 Al Ahed remain competitive enough to cover a narrow away handicap despite being underdogs.
Odds: 1.58
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
38%
Al Nejmeh / Al Nejmeh Most likely path is a controlled home win given the favoritism and low expected scoring.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Al Nejmeh Al Nejmeh are home favorites in this Lebanese derby per all listed odds. Al Ahed have been the stronger side historically but recent form an...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
53%
Al Nejmeh -0.25 Home side holds a slight edge on the -0.25 line according to the tightest prices shown.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
68%
No BTTS No is strongly favored in the market at 1.20, reflecting the defensive nature of these encounters.
Odds: 1.18
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 2.5 Lebanese league games between these sides are typically low scoring. Consensus odds heavily favor under 2.5 across multiple books.
Odds: 1.62
|
|||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
— | — |
60%
Al Nejmeh
W
|
— | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Al Nejmeh Al Nejmeh has a slight historical edge at home, and their recent form shows strong home wins. While Al Ahed has a good away record, Al Nejme...
4 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
30%
Al Nejmeh -1
~2.35
|
40%
Al Nejmeh / Al Nejmeh |
55%
Al Nejmeh
W
|
50%
Al Nejmeh -0.25
W
|
60%
No
~1.18
W
|
55%
Under 2.5
~1.62
W
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
30%
Al Nejmeh -1 Al Nejmeh's home wins are usually by narrow margins, making a -1 handicap risky. Al Ahed is competitive and can keep the deficit small. The...
Odds: 2.35
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
40%
Al Nejmeh / Al Nejmeh Home/Home is the most common double result for Al Nejmeh when they win, but draws at half are also frequent. The probability spread reflects...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Al Nejmeh Al Nejmeh typically has a strong home advantage in the Lebanese Premier League. Historical head-to-head is closely contested but home form g...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
50%
Al Nejmeh -0.25 Asian handicap -0.25 for home gives a half-protection, suitable given close expected contest. Home advantage slightly outweighs away resilie...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
No Both teams prioritize defensive solidity, leading to many clean sheets in head-to-head matches. The odds for 'No' are short, reflecting hist...
Odds: 1.18
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 These teams often play tight, low-scoring affairs in domestic competition. Average goals per match in recent seasons is below 2.5. Bookmaker...
Odds: 1.62
|
|||||||
Spread
ConsensusAl Ahed -1 2/5
Home -1 (giving away 1 goal) is priced at 4.4–6.1, extremely unfavourable odds suggesting low probability of a home win by 2+ goals. Away -1...
Al Nejmeh has a strong home advantage, having won 5 of the last 10 encounters against Al Ahed, with 3 draws and 2 losses. Their recent form...
Al Ahed remain competitive enough to cover a narrow away handicap despite being underdogs.
Al Nejmeh's home wins are usually by narrow margins, making a -1 handicap risky. Al Ahed is competitive and can keep the deficit small. The...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusAl Nejmeh / Al Nejmeh 4/5
Half-time/Full-time requires both correct intervals. Home-Home (home leading at HT and FT) is the most probable outcome given home h2h advan...
Al Nejmeh has a strong home advantage, having won 5 of the last 10 encounters against Al Ahed, with 3 draws and 2 losses. Their recent form...
Most likely path is a controlled home win given the favoritism and low expected scoring.
Home/Home is the most common double result for Al Nejmeh when they win, but draws at half are also frequent. The probability spread reflects...
Match winner
ConsensusAl Nejmeh 6/6
Al Nejmeh is priced as the favourite (1.97–1.98 across bookmakers), suggesting home advantage and stronger current standing in Lebanese foot...
Al Nejmeh has a strong home advantage, having won 5 of the last 10 encounters against Al Ahed, with 3 draws and 2 losses. Their recent form...
Al Nejmeh are home favorites in this Lebanese derby per all listed odds. Al Ahed have been the stronger side historically but recent form an...
Al Nejmeh has a slight historical edge at home, and their recent form shows strong home wins. While Al Ahed has a good away record, Al Nejme...
Al Nejmeh typically has a strong home advantage in the Lebanese Premier League. Historical head-to-head is closely contested but home form g...
Asian handicap
ConsensusAl Nejmeh -0.25 5/5
Asian handicap -0.25 (half-goal) effectively splits draws and slight home wins. Home -0.25 is priced at 1.82–1.99; Away -0.25 at 1.60–1.82....
Al Nejmeh has a strong home advantage, having won 5 of the last 10 encounters against Al Ahed, with 3 draws and 2 losses. Their recent form...
Home side holds a slight edge on the -0.25 line according to the tightest prices shown.
Asian handicap -0.25 for home gives a half-protection, suitable given close expected contest. Home advantage slightly outweighs away resilie...
Both teams to score
ConsensusNo 5/5
Both Teams to Score (Yes) is priced at 3.66, while No is priced at 1.22. The short odds on No indicate strong market consensus that at least...
Both teams have shown a tendency for matches with under 2.5 goals in their recent form. Al Nejmeh has had 3 out of 6 matches with over 2.5 g...
BTTS No is strongly favored in the market at 1.20, reflecting the defensive nature of these encounters.
Both teams prioritize defensive solidity, leading to many clean sheets in head-to-head matches. The odds for 'No' are short, reflecting hist...
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 2.5 5/5
Across bookmakers, Under 2.5 is priced between 1.53–1.60, consistently shorter than Over 2.5 (2.17–2.18). This suggests a betting market con...
In their last 6 matches, Al Nejmeh has averaged 2.17 total goals per game, with 3 out of 6 matches having over 2.5 goals. Al Ahed has averag...
Lebanese league games between these sides are typically low scoring. Consensus odds heavily favor under 2.5 across multiple books.
These teams often play tight, low-scoring affairs in domestic competition. Average goals per match in recent seasons is below 2.5. Bookmaker...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGPT-4o Mini
Al Nejmeh
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Al Nejmeh
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Al Nejmeh
Claude Haiku 4.5
Al Nejmeh
DeepSeek V3
Al Nejmeh
Grok 4 Fast
Al Nejmeh
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Bookmaker odds
11 books · sharp books pinned · best price highlighted
| Book | Al Nejmeh | Draw | Al Ahed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | — | 2.85 | — |
| Bet365 | — | 3.20 | — |
| 10bet | — | 3.10 | — |
| 1xbet | — | 2.92 | — |
| Betano | — | 3.05 | — |
| Betfair | — | 3.20 | — |
| Betvictor | — | 2.88 | — |
| Dafabet | — | 3.05 | — |
| Marathonbet | — | 2.92 | — |
| Superbet | — | 2.90 | — |
| William-hill | — | 2.90 | — |
| Book | Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | — | — | — |
| Bet365 | — | — | — |
| 10bet | — | — | — |
| 1xbet | — | — | — |
| Betano | — | — | — |
| Betfair | — | — | — |
| Betvictor | — | — | — |
| Marathonbet | — | — | — |
| Superbet | — | — | — |
| William-hill | — | — | — |
| Book | Al Nejmeh | Al Ahed |
|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | — | — |
| Bet365 | — | — |
| 10bet | — | — |
| 1xbet | — | — |
| Betano | — | — |
| Betvictor | — | — |
| Marathonbet | — | — |
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
deb373ac3ae7cf9f…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Jun 12 · 18:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 6. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 6, in this order): h2h | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 891,
"sport": "football",
"venue": null,
"league": "Premier League",
"starts_at": "2026-06-12T18:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Al Ahed",
"home": "Al Nejmeh"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-11T15:58:04+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": {
"h2h": [
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.4,
"outcome": "Away"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.4,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.76,
"outcome": "Home"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3,
"outcome": "Away"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.29,
"outcome": "Home"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.2,
"outcome": "Away"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.3,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.76,
"outcome": "Home"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.92,
"outcome": "Away"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.3,
"outcome": "Home"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.2,
"outcome": "Away"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.25,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.78,
"outcome": "Home"
}
],
"btts": [
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.2,
"outcome": "No"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.94,
"outcome": "Yes"
}
],
"totals": [
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.19,
"outcome": "Under 3.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.75,
"outcome": "Over 3.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.6,
"outcome": "Under 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.17,
"outcome": "Over 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.72,
"outcome": "Under 1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.36,
"outcome": "Over 1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Under 0.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.62,
"outcome": "Over 0.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.27,
"outcome": "Under 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.45,
"outcome": "Over 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.57,
"outcome": "Under 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.1,
"outcome": "Over 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.75,
"outcome": "Under 2.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.88,
"outcome": "Over 2.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.71,
"outcome": "Under 1.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.94,
"outcome": "Over 1.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.2,
"outcome": "Under 1.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.58,
"outcome": "Over 1.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.74,
"outcome": "Under 0.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.36,
"outcome": "Over 0.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.2,
"outcome": "Under 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.27,
"outcome": "Over 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.11,
"outcome": "Under 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 5.3,
"outcome": "Over 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.49,
"outcome": "Under 1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Over 1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.39,
"outcome": "Under 1.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.62,
"outcome": "Over 1.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.64,
"outcome": "Under 1.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.1,
"outcome": "Over 1.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.06,
"outcome": "Under 0.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.66,
"outcome": "Over 0.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.47,
"outcome": "Under 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.44,
"outcome": "Over 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 21,
"outcome": "Over 3.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.03,
"outcome": "Under 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 8.1,
"outcome": "Over 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.28,
"outcome": "Under 1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.14,
"outcome": "Over 1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.03,
"outcome": "Under 4.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 7.2,
"outcome": "Over 4.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.21,
"outcome": "Under 3.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.58,
"outcome": "Over 3.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.05,
"outcome": "Under 4.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 8,
"outcome": "Over 4.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.26,
"outcome": "Under 3.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.2,
"outcome": "Over 3.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.58,
"outcome": "Under 1.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.21,
"outcome": "Over 1.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 6.2,
"outcome": "Under 1.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.06,
"outcome": "Over 1.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 8,
"outcome": "Under 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.05,
"outcome": "Over 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.17,
"outcome": "Under 3.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.94,
"outcome": "Over 3.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.42,
"outcome": "Under 2.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.49,
"outcome": "Over 2.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.6,
"outcome": "Under 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.17,
"outcome": "Over 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.79,
"outcome": "Under 2.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.89,
"outcome": "Over 2.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.07,
"outcome": "Under 2.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Over 2.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.45,
"outcome": "Under 1.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.48,
"outcome": "Over 1.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.74,
"outcome": "Under 1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.35,
"outcome": "Over 1.5"
}
],
"spreads": [
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.72,
"outcome": "Away -0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.83,
"outcome": "Home -0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.9,
"outcome": "Away -0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.72,
"outcome": "Home -0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.78,
"outcome": "Away +0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.2,
"outcome": "Home +0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.92,
"outcome": "Away +0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.32,
"outcome": "Home +0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Away -0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.71,
"outcome": "Home -0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.17,
"outcome": "Away -1"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.96,
"outcome": "Home -1"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.98,
"outcome": "Away +0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.18,
"outcome": "Home +0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.88,
"outcome": "Away +0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.33,
"outcome": "Home +0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Away -0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.84,
"outcome": "Home -0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.09,
"outcome": "Away -1"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 5.35,
"outcome": "Home -1"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.05,
"outcome": "Away -2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 6.55,
"outcome": "Home -2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.28,
"outcome": "Away -1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.08,
"outcome": "Home -1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.18,
"outcome": "Away -1.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.9,
"outcome": "Home -1.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.08,
"outcome": "Away -2"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 5.7,
"outcome": "Home -2"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.88,
"outcome": "Away +0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.18,
"outcome": "Home +0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.28,
"outcome": "Away +0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.25,
"outcome": "Home +0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.38,
"outcome": "Away -0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.46,
"outcome": "Home -0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.73,
"outcome": "Away -0.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.9,
"outcome": "Home -0.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.5,
"outcome": "Away -1"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.38,
"outcome": "Home -1"
}
]
}
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
6 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.