Al IttihadvsHorriya
Al Ittihad 1–0 Horriya
5 of 6 AIs leaned Al Ittihad — and reality agreed.
- AI lean
- Al Ittihad 5/6
- Correct calls
- 5/6
- Final
- 1–0
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
6 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 6 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 2.5 2/6 models |
No 3/6 models |
Al Ittihad 5/6 models |
Al Ittihad / Al Ittihad 4/6 models |
Al Ittihad 3/6 models |
home_ 0.0 1/6 models |
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 2.5
L
|
62%
No
W
|
68%
Al Ittihad
W
|
55%
Al Ittihad / Al Ittihad |
64%
Al Ittihad |
63%
Al Ittihad -1 |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Al Ittihad's superior attacking depth typically generates multiple goals when playing weaker opposition at home. Horriya's defensive limitat...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
62%
No Horriya's lower competitive level suggests limited offensive threat against an organized Al Ittihad defense. While Al Ittihad will likely sc...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Al Ittihad Al Ittihad is the historically stronger club in Saudi football with superior squad depth and recent investment. Home advantage at Aleppo Int...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
55%
Al Ittihad / Al Ittihad Al Ittihad leading at both halftime and full-time is the most likely scenario given the team quality gap. Horriya's weak position suggests t...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
64%
Al Ittihad Al Ittihad is favored to win by at least 2 goals given the quality differential and home advantage. A 2–0, 3–0, or 3–1 scoreline aligns with...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
63%
Al Ittihad -1 The -1 Asian handicap aligns with Al Ittihad's strong home position and expected margin of victory. A 2+ goal win triggers a full payout; a... |
|||||||
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
under
W
|
60%
no
W
|
68%
Al Ittihad
W
|
45%
home_home |
58%
Al Ittihad |
57%
home_ -1 |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under Matches involving lower-tier Syrian sides often produce fewer than three goals due to defensive setups. Aleppo venue and June conditions do...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
no Ittihad tends to keep clean sheets at home against weaker opposition. Horriya rarely scores away from home in league play. Expect a controll...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Al Ittihad Al Ittihad is the stronger side historically in the Syrian top flight and plays at home in Aleppo. Horriya has struggled to compete against...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
45%
home_home Ittihad is likely to take an early lead and maintain control through the second half. Halftime lead conversion to full-time win is common fo...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Al Ittihad Home side expected to win by two or more goals given quality gap. Spreads market rewards covering a one-goal margin comfortably. Historical...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
57%
home_ -1 Al Ittihad should clear a one-goal handicap at home. The away side lacks the firepower to force a draw or narrow defeat. Training knowledge... |
|||||||
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
over_2.5
L
|
60%
yes
L
|
45%
home_win
L
|
25%
Al Ittihad / Al Ittihad |
65%
away_covers_ +1 |
55%
Horriya_ +0.5 |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 Premier League matches, even in a hypothetical context, often feature a moderate number of goals. With no specific defensive or offensive da...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
yes Assuming both teams possess reasonable attacking capabilities in a top-tier league, 'Both Teams To Score' is a common outcome. The home team...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
home_win Based on general football knowledge and the typical home advantage, Al Ittihad is given a slight edge. Without current form or head-to-head...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
25%
Al Ittihad / Al Ittihad If Al Ittihad secures a home win, the most straightforward path is to lead at both half-time and full-time. However, a draw at half-time tra...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
away_covers_ +1 For Al Ittihad to cover a -1 spread, they would need to win by two or more goals, which is a significant margin for a potentially competitiv...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
Horriya_ +0.5 Assuming a slight favoritism for Al Ittihad, a -0.5 Asian Handicap means they must win outright. Horriya +0.5 means they win or draw, which... |
|||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
over
L
|
58%
yes
L
|
55%
Al Ittihad
W
|
48%
home_home |
52%
Al Ittihad |
55%
home_ 0.0 |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over My training data suggests that matches involving these two teams, particularly when Al Ittihad is playing at home, tend to be more open and...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
58%
yes Given Al Ittihad's offensive capabilities at home and Horriya's occasional ability to score even in away fixtures, there's a reasonable like...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Al Ittihad Based on my training data, Al Ittihad typically has a stronger historical performance and home advantage in this league. Horriya has struggl...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
48%
home_home Based on my training data, Al Ittihad often starts games strongly at home and maintains that pressure throughout. Horriya has shown weakness...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Al Ittihad While Al Ittihad is favored to win, a -1 handicap is significant. Based on my training data, their home wins are not always by a large margi...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
home_ 0.0 The -0.0 Asian Handicap is essentially a bet on the match outcome. Given Al Ittihad's historical home advantage and tendency to perform bett... |
|||||||
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Under 2.5
W
|
65%
No
W
|
80%
Al Ittihad
W
|
75%
Al Ittihad / Al Ittihad |
70%
Al Ittihad -1 |
72%
Al Ittihad -0.75
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 Matches between these teams have historically been low-scoring. Al Ittihad's defensive setup suggests a controlled game. Training data throu...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
65%
No Horriya has historically struggled to score against Al Ittihad, especially away. Al Ittihad's defense is typically solid. Both teams scoring...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
80%
Al Ittihad Al Ittihad is a historically stronger side in this fixture, especially at home. Horriya has struggled away from home in recent seasons. Base...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
75%
Al Ittihad / Al Ittihad Al Ittihad is expected to lead at halftime and maintain control throughout. Horriya's lack of offensive threat makes a comeback unlikely.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
70%
Al Ittihad -1 Al Ittihad's home advantage and superior quality suggest they can win by more than one goal. Horriya's away form is poor. Spread -1 is reali...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
72%
Al Ittihad -0.75 Asian handicap -0.75 gives half protection while expecting a win. Al Ittihad's strength and home field justify this expectation. Training kn... |
|||||||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
58%
Over 2.5
L
Al Ittihad's superior attacking depth typically generates multiple goals when playing weaker opposition at home. Horriya's defensive limitat...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
55%
under
W
Matches involving lower-tier Syrian sides often produce fewer than three goals due to defensive setups. Aleppo venue and June conditions do...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
55%
over_2.5
L
Premier League matches, even in a hypothetical context, often feature a moderate number of goals. With no specific defensive or offensive da...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
60%
over
L
My training data suggests that matches involving these two teams, particularly when Al Ittihad is playing at home, tend to be more open and...
DeepSeek V3
55%
Under 2.5
W
Matches between these teams have historically been low-scoring. Al Ittihad's defensive setup suggests a controlled game. Training data throu...
Both teams to score
ConsensusNo 3/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
62%
No
W
Horriya's lower competitive level suggests limited offensive threat against an organized Al Ittihad defense. While Al Ittihad will likely sc...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
60%
no
W
Ittihad tends to keep clean sheets at home against weaker opposition. Horriya rarely scores away from home in league play. Expect a controll...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
60%
yes
L
Assuming both teams possess reasonable attacking capabilities in a top-tier league, 'Both Teams To Score' is a common outcome. The home team...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
58%
yes
L
Given Al Ittihad's offensive capabilities at home and Horriya's occasional ability to score even in away fixtures, there's a reasonable like...
DeepSeek V3
65%
No
W
Horriya has historically struggled to score against Al Ittihad, especially away. Al Ittihad's defense is typically solid. Both teams scoring...
Match winner
ConsensusAl Ittihad 5/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
68%
Al Ittihad
W
Al Ittihad is the historically stronger club in Saudi football with superior squad depth and recent investment. Home advantage at Aleppo Int...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
68%
Al Ittihad
W
Al Ittihad is the stronger side historically in the Syrian top flight and plays at home in Aleppo. Horriya has struggled to compete against...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
45%
home_win
L
Based on general football knowledge and the typical home advantage, Al Ittihad is given a slight edge. Without current form or head-to-head...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
Al Ittihad
W
Based on my training data, Al Ittihad typically has a stronger historical performance and home advantage in this league. Horriya has struggl...
DeepSeek V3
80%
Al Ittihad
W
Al Ittihad is a historically stronger side in this fixture, especially at home. Horriya has struggled away from home in recent seasons. Base...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusAl Ittihad / Al Ittihad 4/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
55%
Al Ittihad / Al Ittihad
Al Ittihad leading at both halftime and full-time is the most likely scenario given the team quality gap. Horriya's weak position suggests t...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
45%
home_home
Ittihad is likely to take an early lead and maintain control through the second half. Halftime lead conversion to full-time win is common fo...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
25%
Al Ittihad / Al Ittihad
If Al Ittihad secures a home win, the most straightforward path is to lead at both half-time and full-time. However, a draw at half-time tra...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
48%
home_home
Based on my training data, Al Ittihad often starts games strongly at home and maintains that pressure throughout. Horriya has shown weakness...
DeepSeek V3
75%
Al Ittihad / Al Ittihad
Al Ittihad is expected to lead at halftime and maintain control throughout. Horriya's lack of offensive threat makes a comeback unlikely.
Spread
ConsensusAl Ittihad 3/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
64%
Al Ittihad
Al Ittihad is favored to win by at least 2 goals given the quality differential and home advantage. A 2–0, 3–0, or 3–1 scoreline aligns with...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
58%
Al Ittihad
Home side expected to win by two or more goals given quality gap. Spreads market rewards covering a one-goal margin comfortably. Historical...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
65%
away_covers_ +1
For Al Ittihad to cover a -1 spread, they would need to win by two or more goals, which is a significant margin for a potentially competitiv...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
52%
Al Ittihad
While Al Ittihad is favored to win, a -1 handicap is significant. Based on my training data, their home wins are not always by a large margi...
DeepSeek V3
70%
Al Ittihad -1
Al Ittihad's home advantage and superior quality suggest they can win by more than one goal. Horriya's away form is poor. Spread -1 is reali...
Asian handicap
Consensushome_ 0.0 1/6
Claude Haiku 4.5
63%
Al Ittihad -1
The -1 Asian handicap aligns with Al Ittihad's strong home position and expected margin of victory. A 2+ goal win triggers a full payout; a...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
57%
home_ -1
Al Ittihad should clear a one-goal handicap at home. The away side lacks the firepower to force a draw or narrow defeat. Training knowledge...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
55%
Horriya_ +0.5
Assuming a slight favoritism for Al Ittihad, a -0.5 Asian Handicap means they must win outright. Horriya +0.5 means they win or draw, which...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
home_ 0.0
The -0.0 Asian Handicap is essentially a bet on the match outcome. Given Al Ittihad's historical home advantage and tendency to perform bett...
DeepSeek V3
72%
Al Ittihad -0.75
W
Asian handicap -0.75 gives half protection while expecting a win. Al Ittihad's strength and home field justify this expectation. Training kn...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winner
DeepSeek V3
Al Ittihad
Claude Haiku 4.5
Al Ittihad
Grok 4 Fast
Al Ittihad
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Al Ittihad
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Al Ittihad
Gemini 2.5 Flash
home_win
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
8f15fd786a23f0b1…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Jun 14 · 18:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 6. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 6, in this order): h2h | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 1618,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Aleppo International Stadium",
"league": "Premier League",
"starts_at": "2026-06-14T13:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 14 Jun 2026 13:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Horriya",
"home": "Al Ittihad"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-13T07:18:53+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.