Yuliia StarodubtsevavsJanice Tjen
JTAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 21.5 Games 1/10 models |
Yuliia Starodubtseva 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 1.5 sets |
62%
Yuliia Starodubtseva |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 sets A best-of-three set match between mid-tier WTA/ITF players on hard court typically goes at least two sets unless there is a significant rank...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Yuliia Starodubtseva Starodubtseva is a more established ITF/WTA circuit player with stronger baseline consistency and serve reliability compared to Tjen, a lowe... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
over_2.5 |
62%
Yuliia Starodubtseva |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over_2.5 Both players are mid-tier WTA competitors likely to split early sets on hard courts. Starodubtseva's experience favors a competitive three-s...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Yuliia Starodubtseva Yuliia Starodubtseva holds a higher ranking and better hard-court results in her established career through 2025. Janice Tjen lacks comparab... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Over 21.5 Games |
55%
Yuliia Starodubtseva |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 21.5 Games Given my expectation of a closely contested match likely extending to three sets, the total number of games is anticipated to be relatively...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Yuliia Starodubtseva Based on my training data up to late 2023/early 2024, Yuliia Starodubtseva generally demonstrates a more consistent performance level on har... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Janice Tjen |
75%
Yuliia Starodubtseva |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Janice Tjen Given Starodubtseva's superior ranking and form, it's likely she will win in straight sets. However, Tjen is capable of winning a set on a g...
2 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Yuliia Starodubtseva Yuliia Starodubtseva is significantly higher ranked (141 vs 304) and has a stronger recent record on hard courts. While Janice Tjen has show...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
under_2.5 |
70%
Yuliia Starodubtseva |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
under_2.5 Given the expected disparity in level, this match is likely to be decided in straight sets. Starodubtseva's superior ranking and serve shoul...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Yuliia Starodubtseva Based on my training data through early 2025, Yuliia Starodubtseva has a higher WTA ranking and more experience on the main tour, while Jani... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 21.5 Games 1/10
A best-of-three set match between mid-tier WTA/ITF players on hard court typically goes at least two sets unless there is a significant rank...
Both players are mid-tier WTA competitors likely to split early sets on hard courts. Starodubtseva's experience favors a competitive three-s...
Given my expectation of a closely contested match likely extending to three sets, the total number of games is anticipated to be relatively...
Given Starodubtseva's superior ranking and form, it's likely she will win in straight sets. However, Tjen is capable of winning a set on a g...
Given the expected disparity in level, this match is likely to be decided in straight sets. Starodubtseva's superior ranking and serve shoul...
Match winner
ConsensusYuliia Starodubtseva 5/5
Starodubtseva is a more established ITF/WTA circuit player with stronger baseline consistency and serve reliability compared to Tjen, a lowe...
Yuliia Starodubtseva holds a higher ranking and better hard-court results in her established career through 2025. Janice Tjen lacks comparab...
Based on my training data up to late 2023/early 2024, Yuliia Starodubtseva generally demonstrates a more consistent performance level on har...
Yuliia Starodubtseva is significantly higher ranked (141 vs 304) and has a stronger recent record on hard courts. While Janice Tjen has show...
Based on my training data through early 2025, Yuliia Starodubtseva has a higher WTA ranking and more experience on the main tour, while Jani...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Yuliia Starodubtseva
DeepSeek V3
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Claude Haiku 4.5
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Grok 4 Fast
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
94d522220d614058…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Aug 25 · 22:55 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31134,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Abierto GNP Seguros",
"starts_at": "2026-08-25T22:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 25 Aug 2026 22:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Janice Tjen",
"home": "Yuliia Starodubtseva"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.