Wu YibingvsJames Duckworth
JDAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Wu Yibing 5/5 models |
Over 35.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Wu Yibing |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Wu Yibing Wu Yibing is a rising Chinese talent with superior hard-court credentials and ranking depth; at the US Open on fast hard courts, his aggress...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Wu Yibing is the favourite but Duckworth is not a pushover; his defensive consistency and break-point ability can steal sets from aggressive... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Wu Yibing |
55%
over_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Wu Yibing Wu Yibing holds the higher upside and better hard-court movement from prior ATP results while Duckworth remains a consistent but lower-ceili...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_3.5 Duckworth's serve-heavy style and Wu's occasional inconsistency on return suggest the match will extend. Training data indicates both player... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Wu Yibing |
65%
over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Wu Yibing Based on my training data up to my last knowledge cut-off, Wu Yibing generally exhibits a higher ceiling with his aggressive hard-court game...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
over 3.5 Both players are capable on hard courts, and a Grand Slam best-of-5 match often sees competitive play beyond straight sets. James Duckworth'... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Wu Yibing |
60%
James Duckworth |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Wu Yibing Wu Yibing is a higher-ranked player who has achieved a career-high of World No. 87 and won an ATP title. James Duckworth's career-high is Wo...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
James Duckworth While Wu Yibing is favored, James Duckworth is a solid competitor on hard courts. Duckworth has the capability to win sets, especially if Wu...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
Wu Yibing |
51%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Wu Yibing Wu Yibing has shown strong form on hard courts in 2026, including a title run on the ATP Challenger tour. Duckworth is a solid veteran but h...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
Over 3.5 Both players are consistent baseliners who rarely blow opponents off the court, leading to tight matches. Their head-to-head, though sparse,... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusWu Yibing 5/5
Wu Yibing is a rising Chinese talent with superior hard-court credentials and ranking depth; at the US Open on fast hard courts, his aggress...
Wu Yibing holds the higher upside and better hard-court movement from prior ATP results while Duckworth remains a consistent but lower-ceili...
Based on my training data up to my last knowledge cut-off, Wu Yibing generally exhibits a higher ceiling with his aggressive hard-court game...
Wu Yibing is a higher-ranked player who has achieved a career-high of World No. 87 and won an ATP title. James Duckworth's career-high is Wo...
Wu Yibing has shown strong form on hard courts in 2026, including a title run on the ATP Challenger tour. Duckworth is a solid veteran but h...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 35.5 2/10
Wu Yibing is the favourite but Duckworth is not a pushover; his defensive consistency and break-point ability can steal sets from aggressive...
Duckworth's serve-heavy style and Wu's occasional inconsistency on return suggest the match will extend. Training data indicates both player...
Both players are capable on hard courts, and a Grand Slam best-of-5 match often sees competitive play beyond straight sets. James Duckworth'...
While Wu Yibing is favored, James Duckworth is a solid competitor on hard courts. Duckworth has the capability to win sets, especially if Wu...
Both players are consistent baseliners who rarely blow opponents off the court, leading to tight matches. Their head-to-head, though sparse,...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Wu Yibing
Claude Haiku 4.5
Wu Yibing
Grok 4 Fast
Wu Yibing
DeepSeek V3
Wu Yibing
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Wu Yibing
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a029018702655ba5…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 2 · 22:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35142,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-02T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 02 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "James Duckworth",
"home": "Wu Yibing"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.