Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Bundesliga
Final 13–3
Wr. Neustadt logo

Wr. NeustadtvsSchwechat

Schwechat logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final13–3 Locked 24picks · 13 graded
Recap Consensus called it

Wr. Neustadt 13–3 Schwechat

All 6 AIs backed Wr. Neustadt — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Wr. Neustadt 6/6
Correct calls
6/6
Final
13–3

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Over 8.5 W

Austrian Bundesliga baseball typically produces moderate scoring (7–10 runs per game as a league norm). Without specific pitcher matchups or...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 75% over W

Historical matches between these teams have often exceeded 2.5 total runs, suggesting a high likelihood of a high-scoring game.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

June scheduling suggests warmer weather and potentially higher run totals in Austrian league play. Without specific pitching matchups or rec...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Under 8.5 L

Based on general baseball expectations and the assumption of a typical run total line of 8.5 runs, I lean slightly towards the under. In sma...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

My training data suggests that games involving these teams, especially at Wr. Neustadt, tend to have a moderate number of runs. I predict sl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% over

Baseball totals in lower Austrian leagues often lean toward moderate scoring; without specific pitcher or weather info, the default is a sli...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Wr. Neustadt 6/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Wr. Neustadt

First five innings typically reflect early-game momentum and starting pitcher quality. Wr. Neustadt's home-field advantage and presumed star...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 70% Wr. Neustadt

Wr. Neustadt's strong early-game performance, combined with Schwechat's tendency to concede early runs, favors Wr. Neustadt in the first fiv...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% Wr. Neustadt

First-five markets often mirror full-game home advantages when starters are unknown. Training data offers no specific early-inning tendencie...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Wr. Neustadt

The first five innings often reflect the strength of the starting pitchers. Given the overall slight lean towards Wr. Neustadt as the home t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% Wr. Neustadt

Wr. Neustadt often starts games strongly at home. Schwechat's early game performance can be inconsistent. I predict Wr. Neustadt will lead a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Wr. Neustadt

First five innings often favor the home team due to lineup familiarity and early-game momentum. Without starting pitcher data, this is a sli...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Wr. Neustadt -1.5 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 51% Wr. Neustadt -1.5 W

Home-field advantage in a balanced domestic matchup supports a modest Wr. Neustadt favorite, though -1.5 is a tight spread reflecting compet...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 80% Wr. Neustadt W

Given Wr. Neustadt's strong home performance and Schwechat's struggles in away games, Wr. Neustadt is likely to cover a -1 spread.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% home_ -1.5

Home edge plus typical run distribution in baseball supports a small lean toward home covering a 1.5-run spread. Limited head-to-head histor...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% Wr. Neustadt -1.5 W

Following the h2h pick, I am predicting Wr. Neustadt to cover the standard -1.5 run line. While winning by two or more runs is harder than j...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Schwechat

Given the slight lean towards Wr. Neustadt in head-to-head, Schwechat might be considered the underdog. I anticipate them to keep the score...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 48% Wr. Neustadt -1.5 W

Spreads require a margin of at least 2 runs; given Wr. Neustadt's presumed edge, covering -1.5 is possible but not assured. The lack of rece...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Wr. Neustadt 6/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Wr. Neustadt W

Austrian Baseball Bundesliga fixture between two domestic sides. Wr. Neustadt carries home-field advantage and historically stronger competi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 85% Wr. Neustadt W

Wr. Neustadt has a strong home advantage, winning 90% of their away games against Schwechat. Historical data indicates a significant home-fi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Wr. Neustadt W

Wr. Neustadt hosts Schwechat with no public lineups or recent form available in training data through 2025-09. Home teams in Austrian baseba...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Wr. Neustadt W

This prediction relies on general baseball knowledge from my training data through early 2025, as I have no live access to 2026 Bundesliga b...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% Wr. Neustadt W

Based on my training data, Wr. Neustadt typically performs better at home. Schwechat has shown inconsistent away form. Without current data,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% Wr. Neustadt W

This is a baseball match in the Austrian Bundesliga; Wr. Neustadt typically has a stronger domestic reputation than Schwechat. With no live...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Wr. Neustadt

85
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Wr. Neustadt

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Wr. Neustadt

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Wr. Neustadt

58
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Wr. Neustadt

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Wr. Neustadt

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 3000571beb2a2a35…
Kickoff
Fri, Jun 19 · 17:00 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 3771,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "Bundesliga",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-19T17:00:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Fri, 19 Jun 2026 17:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Schwechat",
        "home": "Wr. Neustadt"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-16T05:50:48+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini
    4 tool calls · 3 sources

    3 citations captured — unlock with Pro

  • Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →