Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Nationals Park
Upcoming · in 83h 28m
Washington Nationals logo

Washington NationalsvsChicago Cubs

Chicago Cubs logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 7/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Chicago Cubs

Chicago enters with superior recent form (3W-2L vs 2W-3L) and better run differential over the last 5 matches (+0.2 vs -0.8). The Cubs have...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Chicago Cubs

Cubs have the stronger lineup over the season and StatMuse / TheScore previews list Shota Imanaga (Cubs) and Cade Cavalli (Nats) as the prob...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs

The Chicago Cubs have a slightly better overall record and have been performing well recently, winning 6 of their last 10 games. The Washing...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Chicago Cubs

Cubs enter with stronger recent form (WWWLL) than Nationals (LWLWL) and the matchup favors Chicago based on season-long trends in my trainin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Chicago Cubs

Based on the slightly better recent form provided and general team strength derived from training data up to my last update, the Chicago Cub...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Chicago Cubs

The Chicago Cubs have a better recent form and appear to be a stronger team overall in the 2026 season based on standings. While the startin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Chicago Cubs

Based on training data through 2025-09, the Cubs have a stronger overall roster and better recent form, while the Nationals have been incons...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Under 8.5

Combined scoring in the last 5 matches is 51 runs across 10 team-games (5.1 per team per game), suggesting a lean toward the Under. Washingt...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% over

Both clubs have been averaging healthy run production recently and Cavalli, while capable of 6–7 strong innings, has had enough variability...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over

Both teams have been scoring at a moderate rate, with the Cubs averaging 5.1 runs per game and the Nationals averaging 5.5 runs per game. Gi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Both teams have allowed high run totals in recent games (33 and 34 conceded in 5 matches). Nationals Park in August typically plays neutral...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Over 8.5

Both teams have shown a tendency to concede a significant number of runs in their recent five games (Cubs 33, Nationals 34), indicating pote...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over

While neither team has exceptionally high-scoring recent form, the Nationals have conceded a significant number of runs. The weather forecas...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% over

Both teams have shown offensive capability, with the Nationals scoring 30 runs and the Cubs 21 in their last five games. The starting pitche...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Under 4.5

Early-inning totals typically track closely with overall game trends. Chicago's subdued run-scoring rate (4.2 per game) and Washington's def...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 54% Chicago Cubs

First-five outcomes are heavily influenced by the starting pitchers and early offense; Imanaga has been effective early in his recent starts...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs have shown a tendency to start games strong, and their recent form suggests they are likely to lead after the first five innings. T...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Chicago Cubs

Early-game trends in my training data favor the Cubs lineup against Washington starters. Both bullpens are rested but the first-five outcome...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Chicago Cubs

The first five innings largely reflect the starting pitcher matchup and initial lineup strength. Given the Cubs' slightly better recent form...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs' recent form suggests they have a slight advantage in consistently performing well early in games. Without specific starting pitche...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 54% Chicago Cubs

In the first five innings, the starting pitchers are the main factor. The Cubs' starter has historically been more effective, giving them an...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Chicago Cubs -1.5

Chicago's 3-2 form and run-differential edge (+0.2 vs Washington's -0.8) support a slight lean toward the Cubs covering a modest spread. Was...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 46% Chicago Cubs -1.5

While I like the Cubs to win straight (moneyline), the runline (Cubs -1.5) is substantially harder because Cavalli can go multiple innings a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs' recent form and slightly better overall record suggest they are more likely to cover the -1 spread. Their recent performance indic...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% away_ -1.5

Cubs hold the edge in overall team strength per historical data and the Nationals have shown inconsistency at home. The run differential in...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% Washington Nationals +1.5

While the Chicago Cubs are slightly favored to win the game, baseball frequently sees close contests where games are decided by a single run...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Chicago Cubs

Given the Cubs' slightly better form and overall season performance, they are favored to win by more than one run. The Nationals' tendency t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs are slightly favored on the run line, given their superior form and roster depth. The Nationals have struggled defensively, concedi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Chicago Cubs

62
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Chicago Cubs

58
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Chicago Cubs

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Chicago Cubs

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Chicago Cubs

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Chicago Cubs

54
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Chicago Cubs

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1039–1061 · 49%
-752.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: ad6e2bc1726be19a…
Kickoff
Thu, Aug 13 · 20:05 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 24123,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Nationals Park",
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-13T20:05:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Thu, 13 Aug 2026 20:05:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Chicago Cubs",
        "home": "Washington Nationals"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "WWWLL",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 21,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 33
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "LWLWL",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 30,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 34
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 35,
            "home": 33
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →