Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Nationals Park
Upcoming · in 87h 23m
Washington Nationals logo

Washington NationalsvsChicago Cubs

Chicago Cubs logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs enter with superior recent form (3W-2L vs Nationals' 2W-3L over the last 5 games) and have outscored opponents 21-33 despite a nega...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% Chicago Cubs

After reviewing team news and probable-pitcher resources, the Cubs look like the stronger side: their rotation and underlying offense (Statc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs

The Chicago Cubs have a stronger recent form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches, while the Washington Nationals have only 2 wins in the same...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Washington Nationals

Nationals hold slight home edge at Nationals Park despite mixed recent form. Cubs' last-five defensive struggles (33 runs conceded) suggest...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Chicago Cubs

Based on the provided recent form, the Chicago Cubs have a slightly better record at 3W-2L compared to the Washington Nationals' 2W-3L. Whil...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs have a slightly better recent form and a marginally better overall record. While head-to-head data is unavailable, the Cubs' recent...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Washington Nationals

Based on training data through 2025-09, but this is a future game; I have no live access. The Nationals have a slight home-field edge at Nat...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Under 8.5

Recent form data shows both teams combining for 51 runs across 5 games each (Nationals 30, Cubs 21), averaging 5.1 total runs per team per g...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 53% over

Both teams have recently been involved in higher-scoring affairs and the bullpens have been used enough that late-inning runs are possible;...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over

Both teams have shown a tendency to score and concede multiple runs in recent games. The Cubs have scored 21 runs and conceded 33 in their l...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% over

Both teams' recent scoring indicates elevated run totals, with home side averaging 6 runs per game. Outdoor park factors and long rest perio...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% Over 8.5 Runs

Both teams have been involved in relatively high-scoring games recently. The Cubs' last five matches averaged 10.8 total runs, while the Nat...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% over

Nationals Park can be a hitter-friendly park, and both teams have shown some ability to score runs. The provided form data shows a decent nu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Over 8.5

Both teams have shown high-scoring tendencies recently, with the Nationals averaging 6 runs per game and the Cubs 4.2 over their last five....

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Chicago Cubs -1.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 51% Chicago Cubs -1.5

The Cubs' recent winning form (3-2) and slight rest advantage support a marginal edge; however, the Nationals' home-field advantage at Natio...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 40% Chicago Cubs -1.5

A Cubs win is my primary outcome, but covering a -1.5 runline (winning by 2+) is less likely than a one-run win because Nationals at home wi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs

Given the Cubs' stronger recent form and overall season performance, they are more likely to cover the -1 spread in this matchup.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Washington Nationals

Nationals' home record and Cubs' road pitching woes point to a narrow home cover on the run line. High rest days reduce bullpen reliability...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 48% Chicago Cubs -1.5

Following the slight H2H lean towards the Cubs due to their better recent form, picking them to cover a -1.5 run spread is a logical extensi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Chicago Cubs

Given the slight advantage in form and potential to score, the Chicago Cubs are favored to cover a -1.5 run spread. While not a strong convi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 45% Washington Nationals -1.5

The Nationals are favored to win, but the run line is risky given the uncertainty of the pitching matchup. I lean slightly to the Nationals...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Chicago Cubs 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Under 4.5

First-five-inning totals are heavily pitcher-dependent and influenced by early offensive rhythm. Both teams have shown modest scoring in rec...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 55% Chicago Cubs

First-five outcomes hinge on the starting pitchers: the Cubs' probable rotation members (per MLB/Rotowire notes and Statcast trends) have be...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Cubs

The Cubs' recent form suggests they are likely to start strong in the first five innings, increasing their chances of leading at that point...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Washington Nationals

Early-game starters favor the Nationals in a neutral matchup based on historical park tendencies. Limited recent form data shows balanced fi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% Chicago Cubs

With no information on starting pitchers for this future 2026 game, the first five innings prediction mirrors the full-game H2H pick. The Cu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 53% Washington Nationals

In the first five innings, starting pitchers dominate, but without names I rely on team trends. The Nationals have been better at scoring ea...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First five innings over

Consensus
over 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% over

Both starting pitchers' recent form and the general tendency for runs to be scored early in games at Nationals Park lead to a slight lean to...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Chicago Cubs

58
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Chicago Cubs

58
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Chicago Cubs

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Chicago Cubs

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Washington Nationals

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Washington Nationals

53
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Chicago Cubs

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1039–1061 · 49%
-752.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: cf56e06b030995ca…
Kickoff
Tue, Aug 11 · 22:45 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 23342,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Nationals Park",
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-11T22:45:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Tue, 11 Aug 2026 22:45:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Chicago Cubs",
        "home": "Washington Nationals"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "WWWLL",
            "record": "3W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 21,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 33
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "LWLWL",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 30,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 34
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 34,
            "home": 31
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →