Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Tennis Singapore Tennis Open presented by BNP Paribas
Upcoming · in 35h 51m
WX

Wang XinyuvsDonna Vekic

DV
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 17picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

32 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Donna Vekic 3/5
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Wang Xinyu

Wang Xinyu is the home player at the Singapore Tennis Open and benefits from familiar conditions and no travel fatigue. Both players are ran...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Wang Xinyu

Wang Xinyu is the home player at the Singapore Tennis Open and benefits from familiar conditions and no travel fatigue. Both players are ran...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Donna Vekic

Vekic holds the edge in overall pedigree and hard-court experience against Wang based on historical matchups through 2025. Singapore indoor...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Donna Vekic

Vekic holds the edge in overall pedigree and hard-court experience against Wang based on historical matchups through 2025. Singapore indoor...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% Donna Vekic

Donna Vekic boasts a stronger career profile and more experience on hard courts. She has also secured a straight-sets victory against Wang X...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% Donna Vekic

Donna Vekic boasts a stronger career profile and more experience on hard courts. She has also secured a straight-sets victory against Wang X...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 65% Donna Vekic

Donna Vekic is the higher-ranked player and has a more established career on the WTA tour. While Wang Xinyu is a capable player, Vekic's exp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 65% Donna Vekic

Donna Vekic is the higher-ranked player and has a more established career on the WTA tour. While Wang Xinyu is a capable player, Vekic's exp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 62% Wang Xinyu

No live access available, so this is predicted from training data through 2025-09 plus known player profiles. Wang Xinyu, the Chinese home-c...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 62% Wang Xinyu

No live access available, so this is predicted from training data through 2025-09 plus known player profiles. Wang Xinyu, the Chinese home-c...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
Over 2.5 3/12
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Over 2.5

Both Wang Xinyu and Donna Vekic possess strong serves and break-point conversion rates typical of top-50 players, suggesting competitive tig...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Over 2.5

Both Wang Xinyu and Donna Vekic possess strong serves and break-point conversion rates typical of top-50 players, suggesting competitive tig...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% over_2.5

Both players capable of holding serve on indoor hard, increasing chance of three sets. Vekic favored but Wang can push sets deep. Training d...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% over_2.5

Both players capable of holding serve on indoor hard, increasing chance of three sets. Vekic favored but Wang can push sets deep. Training d...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Under 2.5 sets

Vekic's dominant style on hard courts, as evidenced by their sole head-to-head match where she won in straight sets, suggests she is capable...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Under 2.5 sets

Vekic's dominant style on hard courts, as evidenced by their sole head-to-head match where she won in straight sets, suggests she is capable...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over

While Vekic is favored, Wang Xinyu has shown she can compete and potentially take sets, especially if Vekic is not at her absolute best. A t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over

While Vekic is favored, Wang Xinyu has shown she can compete and potentially take sets, especially if Vekic is not at her absolute best. A t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Over 21.5

If the match is as competitive as expected, a three-setter off a 6-4, 4-6, 6-4 pattern would comfortably clear 21.5 games. Even a straight-s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Over 21.5

If the match is as competitive as expected, a three-setter off a 6-4, 4-6, 6-4 pattern would comfortably clear 21.5 games. Even a straight-s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Donna Vekic

65
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Donna Vekic

65
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Donna Vekic

65
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Donna Vekic

65
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Wang Xinyu

62
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Wang Xinyu

62
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Wang Xinyu

58
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Wang Xinyu

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Donna Vekic

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Donna Vekic

58

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 290–182 · 61%
+135.0u
GPT-5
GPT-5 290–182 · 61%
+135.0u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 308–230 · 57%
-34.8u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 308–230 · 57%
-34.8u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 2446–1994 · 55%
-1,601.7u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 2446–1994 · 55%
-1,601.7u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 1474–1258 · 54%
-816.2u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 1474–1258 · 54%
-816.2u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 260–224 · 54%
+223.5u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 260–224 · 54%
+223.5u
o4-mini
o4-mini 180–156 · 54%
+139.4u
o4-mini
o4-mini 180–156 · 54%
+139.4u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 386–346 · 53%
-95.2u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 386–346 · 53%
-95.2u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 264–248 · 52%
+187.2u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 264–248 · 52%
+187.2u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 366–352 · 51%
-127.1u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 366–352 · 51%
-127.1u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 918–964 · 49%
-647.5u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 918–964 · 49%
-647.5u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 2142–2300 · 48%
-1,974.1u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 2142–2300 · 48%
-1,974.1u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 3332–3618 · 48%
-3,134.9u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 3332–3618 · 48%
-3,134.9u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 4052–4448 · 48%
-4,077.3u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 4052–4448 · 48%
-4,077.3u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 4014–4588 · 47%
-3,970.9u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 4014–4588 · 47%
-3,970.9u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 302–358 · 46%
-147.7u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 302–358 · 46%
-147.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 3376–4008 · 46%
-3,605.6u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 3376–4008 · 46%
-3,605.6u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Team news

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 7a526d6bd1c26a8c…
Kickoff
Mon, Sep 21 · 04:00 GMT+0200
Markets
Match winner · Total sets · Total games
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 46447,
        "sport": "tennis",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "Singapore Tennis Open presented by BNP Paribas",
        "starts_at": "2026-09-21T04:00:00+02:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Mon, 21 Sep 2026 02:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Donna Vekic",
        "home": "Wang Xinyu"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
        "Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
        "Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
        "Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
    ],
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals_sets",
        "totals_games"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →