Viktoria HruncakovavsSusan Bandecchi
SBAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Viktoria Hruncakova 4/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Viktoria Hruncakova |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Viktoria Hruncakova Both players are lower-ranked competitors on the professional circuit; Hruncakova has marginally stronger recent hard-court performance and...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players have serve-and-baseline games that produce competitive rallies rather than dominant performances. Bandecchi's return strength a... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Viktoria Hruncakova |
62%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Viktoria Hruncakova Training data through 2025-09 provides no direct matches between these players. Surface focus on hard courts at US Open favors the listed ho...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under 2.5 Training data through 2025-09 shows both players compete mainly in best-of-3 formats with straight-sets outcomes common at this level. Serve... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
Viktoria Hruncakova |
55%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Viktoria Hruncakova Based on my training data through 2025-09, Viktoria Hruncakova (formerly Kužmová) has historically competed at a higher level on the WTA tou...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 Viktoria Hruncakova typically possesses the firepower to close out matches against players ranked lower than her in straight sets, particula... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Susan Bandecchi |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Susan Bandecchi Based on training data, Viktoria Hruncakova has a slightly higher ranking and a more consistent record on hard courts compared to Susan Band...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over While Hruncakova is the favorite, Bandecchi is capable of taking sets, especially if she can find her rhythm on serve. Given their contrasti...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Viktoria Hruncakova |
55%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Viktoria Hruncakova Training data through early 2025 indicates Hruncakova is a more experienced hard-court player with consistent WTA-level results, while Bande...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 2.5 Given Hruncakova's edge but Bandecchi's competitive spirit, the match is likely to be closely contested with multiple breaks of serve. Both... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusViktoria Hruncakova 4/5
Both players are lower-ranked competitors on the professional circuit; Hruncakova has marginally stronger recent hard-court performance and...
Training data through 2025-09 provides no direct matches between these players. Surface focus on hard courts at US Open favors the listed ho...
Based on my training data through 2025-09, Viktoria Hruncakova (formerly Kužmová) has historically competed at a higher level on the WTA tou...
Based on training data, Viktoria Hruncakova has a slightly higher ranking and a more consistent record on hard courts compared to Susan Band...
Training data through early 2025 indicates Hruncakova is a more experienced hard-court player with consistent WTA-level results, while Bande...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Both players have serve-and-baseline games that produce competitive rallies rather than dominant performances. Bandecchi's return strength a...
Training data through 2025-09 shows both players compete mainly in best-of-3 formats with straight-sets outcomes common at this level. Serve...
Viktoria Hruncakova typically possesses the firepower to close out matches against players ranked lower than her in straight sets, particula...
While Hruncakova is the favorite, Bandecchi is capable of taking sets, especially if she can find her rhythm on serve. Given their contrasti...
Given Hruncakova's edge but Bandecchi's competitive spirit, the match is likely to be closely contested with multiple breaks of serve. Both...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Viktoria Hruncakova
Claude Haiku 4.5
Viktoria Hruncakova
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Susan Bandecchi
DeepSeek V3
Viktoria Hruncakova
Grok 4 Fast
Viktoria Hruncakova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a961f78a5a1242b9…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 18:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31153,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T18:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 18:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Susan Bandecchi",
"home": "Viktoria Hruncakova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.