Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Bundesliga
Final 6–7
Vienna Wanderers logo

Vienna WanderersvsWr. Neustadt

Wr. Neustadt logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final6–7 Locked 20picks · 11 graded
Recap Consensus missed

Vienna Wanderers 6–7 Wr. Neustadt

All 5 AIs backed Vienna Wanderers — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
Vienna Wanderers 5/5
Correct calls
0/5
Final
6–7

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Vienna Wanderers 5/5
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Vienna Wanderers L

Vienna Wanderers play at home and historically enjoy a modest advantage in Austrian baseball fixtures. Without access to current 2026 season...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 62% Vienna Wanderers L

Vienna Wanderers are the stronger home side in Austrian Bundesliga baseball based on historical performance. Wr. Neustadt typically struggle...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Vienna Wanderers L

This prediction is made purely from my training data through 2025-09, as I have no live access to real-time information for this niche leagu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Vienna Wanderers L

Given that no recent form, head-to-head, or lineup data is available, and operating solely on training data, I predict a slight edge for the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Vienna Wanderers L

As of my training data through September 2025, the Vienna Wanderers have a stronger historical record and home advantage, but Wr. Neustadt i...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Vienna Wanderers -1.5 3/5
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Vienna Wanderers -1.5 L

Home teams in Austrian baseball typically win by 1–2 runs when favored in tight matchups. Vienna Wanderers' home setting provides a small bu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% home_ -1.5

Home advantage and overall team quality point to Vienna covering a modest run line. Road teams in this league rarely keep games close agains...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% Vienna Wanderers -1.5 L

This prediction relies solely on my training data through 2025-09, lacking real-time context. Aligning with the H2H pick, a marginal advanta...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Vienna Wanderers L

Predicting the spread is challenging without specific team data. Based on a slight lean towards the home team in the head-to-head market, I...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 40% Vienna Wanderers -1.5 L

A 1.5-run spread is substantial. Given the uncertainty and no recent form, the underdog covering is more likely. Vienna's home edge may not...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 2/5
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Under 9.5

Austrian Bundesliga baseball typically features moderate run production relative to major leagues, with strong pitching depth. Without curre...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% over

Austrian league games often feature higher run totals due to smaller ballparks and pitching depth issues. Both teams have shown offensive te...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Over 8.5 W

Based on my training data through 2025-09, typical baseball scoring in leagues of this caliber often trends towards moderate to high scoring...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over W

Without specific insights into the teams' offensive and defensive capabilities or typical scoring in this league from my training data, I pr...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 50% Over 9.5

Baseball totals in this league often hover around 9-10 runs. Without current pitching matchups or weather, I assign equal probability. Histo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Vienna Wanderers 4/5
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Under 4.5

Early innings in Austrian baseball typically see slower offensive development, especially in regular-season matchups where starters prioriti...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 60% Vienna Wanderers

Starting pitching edge usually belongs to the home club early in games. Historical patterns favor Vienna establishing leads within the first...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Vienna Wanderers

With predictions drawn from training data through 2025-09 and no live information on starting pitchers or early-game tendencies, I'm leaning...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Vienna Wanderers

For the first five innings, I am predicting Vienna Wanderers to be slightly ahead. This aligns with the overall head-to-head prediction and...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Vienna Wanderers

Early innings often favor the home team due to familiarity and crowd. Same logic as h2h but slightly less certain because bullpens and fatig...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Vienna Wanderers

62
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Vienna Wanderers

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Vienna Wanderers

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Vienna Wanderers

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Vienna Wanderers

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: fda86741642e9d20…
Kickoff
Sat, Jun 13 · 16:00 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 2653,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "Bundesliga",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-13T16:00:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sat, 13 Jun 2026 16:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Wr. Neustadt",
        "home": "Vienna Wanderers"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-12T18:59:40+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →