Victoria BosiovsYou Xiaodi
YXYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Victoria Bosio 3/4 models |
2 2/8 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
Victoria Bosio |
58%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Victoria Bosio Training data through 2025-09. Both players are low-ranked with sparse public records, giving slight home edge to Victoria Bosio on presumed...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under 2.5 Training data through 2025-09. Lower-level ITF events frequently end in straight sets when one player holds a modest ranking edge. Bosio as... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
You Xiaodi |
60%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
You Xiaodi You Xiaodi generally performs better on hard courts, which is the likely surface for an 'Open' tournament without further specification. Her...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 2.5 Sets With You Xiaodi being the stronger player on hard courts, she is likely to win in straight sets. While Bosio is a tenacious competitor, her... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Victoria Bosio |
65%
You Xiaodi |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Victoria Bosio Based on training data, Victoria Bosio is generally a stronger player on hard courts and has a better recent track record than You Xiaodi. B...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
You Xiaodi Given Bosio's likely advantage and the expected consistency of her serve, the match is predicted to be relatively straightforward. Bosio's a... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Victoria Bosio |
60%
You Xiaodi |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Victoria Bosio No live data was available, so this leans on training knowledge through 2025-09. Bosio is a clay-leaning Argentine who has generally perform...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
You Xiaodi Neither player has a dominant serve, but Bosio's greater consistency should let her close out one set comfortably, making a two-set finish t... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusVictoria Bosio 3/4
Training data through 2025-09. Both players are low-ranked with sparse public records, giving slight home edge to Victoria Bosio on presumed...
You Xiaodi generally performs better on hard courts, which is the likely surface for an 'Open' tournament without further specification. Her...
Based on training data, Victoria Bosio is generally a stronger player on hard courts and has a better recent track record than You Xiaodi. B...
No live data was available, so this leans on training knowledge through 2025-09. Bosio is a clay-leaning Argentine who has generally perform...
Over / Under
Consensus2 2/8
Training data through 2025-09. Lower-level ITF events frequently end in straight sets when one player holds a modest ranking edge. Bosio as...
With You Xiaodi being the stronger player on hard courts, she is likely to win in straight sets. While Bosio is a tenacious competitor, her...
Given Bosio's likely advantage and the expected consistency of her serve, the match is predicted to be relatively straightforward. Bosio's a...
Neither player has a dominant serve, but Bosio's greater consistency should let her close out one set comfortably, making a two-set finish t...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
You Xiaodi
DeepSeek V3
Victoria Bosio
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Victoria Bosio
Grok 4 Fast
Victoria Bosio
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
8a3f6dee5586865e…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Sep 13 · 15:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 43237,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "SP Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-13T15:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 13 Sep 2026 15:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "You Xiaodi",
"home": "Victoria Bosio"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.