Valentin RoyervsDalibor Svrcina
DSAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Valentin Royer 4/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Valentin Royer |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Valentin Royer Both players are relatively modest-ranked ATP prospects; Royer has shown greater consistency on hard courts in 2025–26 qualifying and early-...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both Royer and Svrcina are lower-ranked players with relatively balanced serving and break-point defence; neither has dominant first-serve d... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
56%
Valentin Royer |
61%
under_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
56%
Valentin Royer Valentin Royer holds a modest edge in recent hard-court results and ranking points entering 2026. Dalibor Svrcina has shown inconsistency on...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
under_3.5 Lower-ranked qualifiers at the US Open frequently produce straight-set or 3-set matches when one player holds a clear surface edge. Both pla... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Dalibor Svrcina |
75%
Over 3.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Dalibor Svrcina Based on my training data up to my last update, Dalibor Svrcina has shown slightly more consistent performance on hard courts and more exper...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
Over 3.5 sets Considering both players are capable on hard courts and their relatively similar skill levels based on training data, a straight-sets victor... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Valentin Royer |
52%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Valentin Royer Valentin Royer and Dalibor Svrcina have very similar rankings and are at similar career stages. Royer is French and might have a slight home...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Given the closely matched nature of these two players, it is likely that the match will go to three sets. Both players have shown the abilit...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Valentin Royer |
55%
over_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Valentin Royer Training data through 2025-09. Royer has shown stronger hard-court form in Challenger events, while Svrcina is more consistent on clay. The...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_3.5 Training data through 2025-09. Both players are evenly matched in ranking and style, suggesting a tight match that could extend to four sets... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusValentin Royer 4/5
Both players are relatively modest-ranked ATP prospects; Royer has shown greater consistency on hard courts in 2025–26 qualifying and early-...
Valentin Royer holds a modest edge in recent hard-court results and ranking points entering 2026. Dalibor Svrcina has shown inconsistency on...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Dalibor Svrcina has shown slightly more consistent performance on hard courts and more exper...
Valentin Royer and Dalibor Svrcina have very similar rankings and are at similar career stages. Royer is French and might have a slight home...
Training data through 2025-09. Royer has shown stronger hard-court form in Challenger events, while Svrcina is more consistent on clay. The...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Both Royer and Svrcina are lower-ranked players with relatively balanced serving and break-point defence; neither has dominant first-serve d...
Lower-ranked qualifiers at the US Open frequently produce straight-set or 3-set matches when one player holds a clear surface edge. Both pla...
Considering both players are capable on hard courts and their relatively similar skill levels based on training data, a straight-sets victor...
Given the closely matched nature of these two players, it is likely that the match will go to three sets. Both players have shown the abilit...
Training data through 2025-09. Both players are evenly matched in ranking and style, suggesting a tight match that could extend to four sets...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Valentin Royer
DeepSeek V3
Valentin Royer
Grok 4 Fast
Valentin Royer
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Dalibor Svrcina
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Valentin Royer
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
c50f8c5ed796a314…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 18:25 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 33692,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Dalibor Svrcina",
"home": "Valentin Royer"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.