Tristan SchoolkatevsNishesh Basavareddy
NBAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Tristan Schoolkate 5/5 models |
over 3.5 3/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Tristan Schoolkate |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Tristan Schoolkate Both players are relatively low-ranked ATP prospects competing in the US Open main draw or qualifying. Schoolkate is the Australian with a m...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 US Open matches for unseeded players typically see tight, grinding sets on hard courts—serves are held frequently, and break points are hard... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Tristan Schoolkate |
58%
over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Tristan Schoolkate Schoolkate holds a modest edge on outdoor hard courts from prior ATP and Challenger results in training data through 2024. Basavareddy remai...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over 3.5 Both players are baseline-oriented with solid but not dominant serves, pointing to extended sets. First-round US Open matches between simila... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Tristan Schoolkate |
60%
over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Tristan Schoolkate Based on training data up to its cutoff, Tristan Schoolkate, an established Challenger circuit player, holds a slight experience advantage o...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over 3.5 Given the expectation of a competitive H2H matchup between a slightly more experienced player and a promising talent, this best-of-5 sets ma... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Tristan Schoolkate |
60%
2.0 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Tristan Schoolkate Based on my training data up to early 2025, Tristan Schoolkate has a slight edge over Nishesh Basavareddy. Schoolkate generally performs bet...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.0 Given the slight favoritism for Schoolkate and Basavareddy's potential to put up a fight, this match is likely to be competitive. However, I... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Tristan Schoolkate |
55%
over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Tristan Schoolkate Training data through 2025-09: Both players are emerging talents, but Schoolkate has more experience on hard courts and a stronger serve, wh...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 3.5 Both players are competitive and matches between them are likely to extend. Schoolkate's serve keeps sets tight, while Basavareddy's return... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusTristan Schoolkate 5/5
Both players are relatively low-ranked ATP prospects competing in the US Open main draw or qualifying. Schoolkate is the Australian with a m...
Schoolkate holds a modest edge on outdoor hard courts from prior ATP and Challenger results in training data through 2024. Basavareddy remai...
Based on training data up to its cutoff, Tristan Schoolkate, an established Challenger circuit player, holds a slight experience advantage o...
Based on my training data up to early 2025, Tristan Schoolkate has a slight edge over Nishesh Basavareddy. Schoolkate generally performs bet...
Training data through 2025-09: Both players are emerging talents, but Schoolkate has more experience on hard courts and a stronger serve, wh...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3.5 3/10
US Open matches for unseeded players typically see tight, grinding sets on hard courts—serves are held frequently, and break points are hard...
Both players are baseline-oriented with solid but not dominant serves, pointing to extended sets. First-round US Open matches between simila...
Given the expectation of a competitive H2H matchup between a slightly more experienced player and a promising talent, this best-of-5 sets ma...
Given the slight favoritism for Schoolkate and Basavareddy's potential to put up a fight, this match is likely to be competitive. However, I...
Both players are competitive and matches between them are likely to extend. Schoolkate's serve keeps sets tight, while Basavareddy's return...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Tristan Schoolkate
Claude Haiku 4.5
Tristan Schoolkate
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Tristan Schoolkate
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Tristan Schoolkate
Grok 4 Fast
Tristan Schoolkate
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
f7d2135bb8ad9c4c…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 1 · 18:50 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 33693,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Nishesh Basavareddy",
"home": "Tristan Schoolkate"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.