Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Tennis US Open
Final
TS

Trevor SvajdavsJack Pinnington Jones

JP
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 30picks

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

32 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Trevor Svajda 10/10
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Trevor Svajda

Both players are lower-ranked qualifiers or main-draw entrants at the 2026 US Open; Svajda has shown more consistent hard-court performance...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Trevor Svajda

Both players are lower-ranked qualifiers or main-draw entrants at the 2026 US Open; Svajda has shown more consistent hard-court performance...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Trevor Svajda

Both players are low-ranked prospects with limited senior hard-court data in public records through 2025. Trevor Svajda benefits from home-c...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Trevor Svajda

Both players are low-ranked prospects with limited senior hard-court data in public records through 2025. Trevor Svajda benefits from home-c...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% Trevor Svajda

Based on general profiles from training data, Trevor Svajda, as an American player, typically thrives on hard courts, which is the surface f...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% Trevor Svajda

Based on general profiles from training data, Trevor Svajda, as an American player, typically thrives on hard courts, which is the surface f...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 57% Trevor Svajda

Both players are relatively young and are making their way through the professional ranks. Svajda has shown slightly more consistent results...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 57% Trevor Svajda

Both players are relatively young and are making their way through the professional ranks. Svajda has shown slightly more consistent results...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% Trevor Svajda

Training data through 2025-09: Svajda, a promising American junior with a solid hard-court game, is likely to have home advantage at the US...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% Trevor Svajda

Training data through 2025-09: Svajda, a promising American junior with a solid hard-court game, is likely to have home advantage at the US...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
Over 37.5 4/20
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Over 2.5

Both players are journeymen with solid baseline games but neither is a dominant power server; breaks of serve are likely, extending rallies...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Over 2.5

Both players are journeymen with solid baseline games but neither is a dominant power server; breaks of serve are likely, extending rallies...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% over 2.5

Qualifying-level matches at the US Open frequently extend to three sets between evenly matched unknowns. Neither player has dominant serve o...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% over 2.5

Qualifying-level matches at the US Open frequently extend to three sets between evenly matched unknowns. Neither player has dominant serve o...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Over 3.5 sets

Given that both players are still developing on the professional circuit, it's reasonable to expect a competitive match that could extend be...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Over 3.5 sets

Given that both players are still developing on the professional circuit, it's reasonable to expect a competitive match that could extend be...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 62% Jack Pinnington Jones

This is expected to be a closely contested match between two players of similar caliber. While a three-set match is certainly possible, the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 62% Jack Pinnington Jones

This is expected to be a closely contested match between two players of similar caliber. While a three-set match is certainly possible, the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Over 3.5

Both players are competitive at this level, and matches between similar-ranked players often extend to four sets. Svajda's slight edge may n...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Over 3.5

Both players are competitive at this level, and matches between similar-ranked players often extend to four sets. Svajda's slight edge may n...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Trevor Svajda

60
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Trevor Svajda

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Trevor Svajda

58
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Trevor Svajda

58
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Trevor Svajda

58
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Trevor Svajda

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Trevor Svajda

57
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Trevor Svajda

57
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Trevor Svajda

52
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Trevor Svajda

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 290–182 · 61%
+135.0u
GPT-5
GPT-5 290–182 · 61%
+135.0u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 308–230 · 57%
-34.8u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 308–230 · 57%
-34.8u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 2473–2043 · 55%
-1,650.7u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 2473–2043 · 55%
-1,650.7u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 260–224 · 54%
+223.5u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 260–224 · 54%
+223.5u
o4-mini
o4-mini 180–156 · 54%
+139.4u
o4-mini
o4-mini 180–156 · 54%
+139.4u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 1494–1296 · 54%
-854.2u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 1494–1296 · 54%
-854.2u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 386–346 · 53%
-95.2u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 386–346 · 53%
-95.2u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 264–248 · 52%
+187.2u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 264–248 · 52%
+187.2u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 366–352 · 51%
-127.1u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 366–352 · 51%
-127.1u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 918–964 · 49%
-647.5u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 918–964 · 49%
-647.5u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 2202–2352 · 48%
-2,026.1u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 2202–2352 · 48%
-2,026.1u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 3586–3931 · 48%
-3,447.9u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 3586–3931 · 48%
-3,447.9u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 4058–4472 · 48%
-4,101.3u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 4058–4472 · 48%
-4,101.3u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 4283–4944 · 46%
-4,326.9u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 4283–4944 · 46%
-4,326.9u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 302–358 · 46%
-147.7u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 302–358 · 46%
-147.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 3384–4028 · 46%
-3,625.6u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 3384–4028 · 46%
-3,625.6u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 2c4bee50214bcc26…
Kickoff
Tue, Aug 25 · 01:27 GMT+0200
Markets
Match winner · Total sets · Total games
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 30769,
        "sport": "tennis",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "US Open",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-24T21:00:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 21:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Jack Pinnington Jones",
        "home": "Trevor Svajda"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
        "Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
        "Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
        "Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
    ],
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals_sets",
        "totals_games"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro
Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →