Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 4–7
Toronto Blue Jays logo

Toronto Blue JaysvsTexas Rangers

Texas Rangers logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final4–7 Locked 28picks · 17 graded
Recap Consensus missed

Toronto Blue Jays 4–7 Texas Rangers

6 of 7 AIs leaned Toronto Blue Jays — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
Toronto Blue Jays 6/7
Correct calls
1/7
Final
4–7

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 48% Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 L

Home field and roster depth slightly favour Toronto, but -1.5 is a relatively sharp line that prices in those advantages fairly tightly. Tex...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 64% Texas Rangers +1.5 W

A Blue Jays win by 2+ runs (home -1.5) is less likely than a one-run game or Texas cover (+1.5) given both offenses and roster/rotation vari...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 50% Toronto Blue Jays L

The Blue Jays have a strong home record, but the Rangers have been competitive on the road. The spread is tight, making this a balanced matc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 48% Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 L

Home run line value appears marginal given even overall matchup projection. Rangers bullpen historically vulnerable late. All inputs from pr...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Texas Rangers +1.5 W

My analysis is based on training data through 2025-09, as real-time 2026 data is unavailable. While I favor the Blue Jays to win outright, b...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Toronto Blue Jays

While the Rangers are favored in head-to-head, the spread market often presents value on the underdog, especially at home. Given that the Bl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 30% Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 L

The Blue Jays are favored to win but not by a large margin; run line covers are less likely in a close game. Toronto's home advantage isn't...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Toronto Blue Jays 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Toronto Blue Jays L

As of my training knowledge (through September 2025), Toronto has a stronger recent offensive core with Guerrero Jr., Bichette, and Kirk, wh...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% Toronto Blue Jays L

Toronto is the home team at Rogers Centre with a full-looking lineup (Springer, Vladimir Guerrero Jr., Okamoto, Kirk) per MLB's published Ju...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Toronto Blue Jays L

The Toronto Blue Jays have a strong home record and have been performing well recently, while the Texas Rangers have struggled on the road....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Toronto Blue Jays L

Blue Jays hold slight home edge in training data patterns through 2025. Rangers show inconsistent road results historically. No live data av...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Toronto Blue Jays L

My analysis is based on training data through 2025-09, as real-time 2026 data is unavailable. Based on general team strength and historical...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Texas Rangers W

As of late June 2026, the Texas Rangers have shown a stronger recent performance and a better overall season record than the Toronto Blue Ja...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 56% Toronto Blue Jays L

Based on training data through 2025, the Blue Jays have a slight edge at home and better overall roster depth. The Rangers have been inconsi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Toronto Blue Jays 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 53% Toronto Blue Jays

Early-inning advantage typically correlates with offensive depth and early plate discipline. Toronto's established lineup (Guerrero Jr., Bic...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 35% Texas Rangers

First-five innings moneyline favors the home starter if they are dominant, but uncertainty in Toronto's starter availability and Texas' pote...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Toronto Blue Jays

The Blue Jays have been strong in the first five innings at home, often taking early leads. The Rangers have struggled to score early in awa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Toronto Blue Jays

Early game edges often mirror full game home advantage in MLB datasets. Starters project close but home park factor helps. Limited to traini...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 38% Toronto Blue Jays F5

My analysis is based on training data through 2025-09, as real-time 2026 data is unavailable. The Blue Jays generally have solid starting pi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 51% Texas Rangers

The early innings often reflect the starting pitcher matchup and early offensive momentum. Based on the slight favor shown to the Rangers in...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 54% Toronto Blue Jays (F5)

In the first five innings, starting pitchers dominate. Without knowing the starters, I lean to Toronto's home advantage and their stronger l...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Over 8.5 W

Both teams have capable offences; Texas's lineup includes Kyle Schwarber and Corey Seager (if healthy), while Toronto brings Guerrero Jr. an...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% over W

Recent meeting produced 11 runs (Rangers 6, Blue Jays 5 on June 26), and both clubs feature middle-of-order power (Langford, Pederson, Nimmo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over W

Both teams have potent offenses and have been involved in high-scoring games recently. The Blue Jays' home games have averaged over 9.5 runs...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% over

Typical MLB scoring averages favor slight lean to over in summer months per historical trends. Both lineups contain power hitters. Training...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Over 8.5 W

My analysis is based on training data through 2025-09, as real-time 2026 data is unavailable. Historically, both teams possess offenses capa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over

This game features two offenses that can score runs, and while starting pitchers can vary, the general trend in MLB in 2026 has been towards...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Over 8.5

Both teams have above-average offenses based on 2025 data, and the Rogers Centre is a neutral to slightly hitter-friendly park. Starting pit...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Toronto Blue Jays

60
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Toronto Blue Jays

57
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Toronto Blue Jays

56
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Toronto Blue Jays

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Texas Rangers

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Toronto Blue Jays

53
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Toronto Blue Jays

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1039–1061 · 49%
-752.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 9588a76f77394272…
Kickoff
Sat, Jun 27 · 19:07 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 7041,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-27T19:07:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sat, 27 Jun 2026 19:07:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Texas Rangers",
        "home": "Toronto Blue Jays"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-24T05:46:33+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →