Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 0–3
Toronto Blue Jays logo

Toronto Blue JaysvsNew York Mets

New York Mets logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final0–3 Locked 28picks · 19 graded
Recap Consensus missed

Toronto Blue Jays 0–3 New York Mets

5 of 7 AIs leaned Toronto Blue Jays — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
Toronto Blue Jays 5/7
Correct calls
2/7
Final
0–3

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
Over 8.5 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Over 8.5 L

Both the Blue Jays and Mets have historically featured lineups capable of run production. Late-June MLB games often see slightly elevated sc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% under W

Recent series play and the June 29 2-1 result point to a low-scoring environment in this matchup, and both probable starters have strikeout/...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 10 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% under W

Both teams have strong pitching rotations, which suggests a lower-scoring game. Historical data indicates that their recent matchups have te...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% over

Training data shows average MLB run totals around 8.8 in similar park environments. Both clubs historically produced moderate offense when m...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Over 8.5 L

Assuming a standard total line of 8.5 runs based on common MLB totals from training data through 2025-09, the Blue Jays' powerful lineup and...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over L

Based on general MLB trends and historical data through 2025-09, games between teams with comparable historical performance often tend towar...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% Over 7.5

Both lineups feature above-average hitters, and the game is in a neutral ballpark. Starting pitchers are solid but not elite, leading to a m...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 50% Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 L

Home-field advantage favors Toronto, but -1.5 is a moderate spread requiring a convincing win. Without live pitcher matchup data, recent tea...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% New York Mets +1.5 W

Given the narrow game-line and both starters' volatility (Gausman has struggled at times in June; McLean can miss bats and keep the Mets wit...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 10 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% New York Mets W

The Mets have been winning by an average margin of 2 runs in their recent games, suggesting they are likely to cover the -1.5 spread in this...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 L

Home team receives run-line value in training-set MLB data at roughly 52 percent clip. Mets road performance was slightly below average in p...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 L

Based on general team performance trends from training data through 2025-09, if the Toronto Blue Jays secure a victory at home, their strong...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% New York Mets W

Predicting based on training data through 2025-09, the Mets' historical performance against teams like the Blue Jays suggests they can keep...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 25% Toronto Blue Jays -1.5 L

The game is expected to be close; Blue Jays are slight favorites but winning by two runs is unlikely. Run line markets heavily favor the und...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Toronto Blue Jays 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Toronto Blue Jays L

As of my training data (through September 2025), the Blue Jays have maintained competitive roster depth with strong home-field advantage at...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% Toronto Blue Jays L

Probable starters are Kevin Gausman (TOR) vs Nolan McLean (NYM); Gausman is the veteran with better track record in neutral/homerun-suppress...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 10 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% New York Mets W

The New York Mets have shown a slight edge over the Toronto Blue Jays in recent matchups, with a 3-2 record in their last five encounters. A...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Toronto Blue Jays L

Game is in 2026 so all inputs are from training knowledge through late 2023. Blue Jays hold typical home-field edge in this matchup historic...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Toronto Blue Jays L

Based on general team profiles from training data through 2025-09, the Toronto Blue Jays typically possess a potent offense and strong home-...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% New York Mets W

Given that this is a prediction based on training data through 2025-09, the New York Mets have historically shown a slight edge over the Tor...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Toronto Blue Jays L

The game is in Toronto, giving the Blue Jays home-field advantage. While the Mets have strong offensive potential, the Blue Jays' pitching d...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Toronto Blue Jays 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 51% Under 4.5

Early-innings scoring is typically lower than full-game totals due to pitchers establishing rhythm and fewer baserunners in early at-bats. H...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 55% New York Mets

First-five outcomes hinge heavily on the starters — McLean has shown he can miss bats and give the Mets a clean look through five, while Gau...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 10 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% New York Mets

The Mets have been strong in the first five innings, often taking early leads in their recent games, which may continue in this matchup.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Toronto Blue Jays

Early-inning edges typically favor the home club in historical splits. Limited sample of first-five results from past Mets-Blue Jays games l...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 56% Toronto Blue Jays

In the first five innings, the Toronto Blue Jays' strong offense typically gets to work early, supported by capable starting pitching, accor...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% New York Mets

Considering historical performance trends up to 2025-09, the New York Mets have often started games strongly. This prediction relies on the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Toronto Blue Jays

The Blue Jays starting pitcher is slightly more reliable than the Mets' starter. With home advantage and recent form, Toronto is more likely...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Toronto Blue Jays

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Toronto Blue Jays

58
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Toronto Blue Jays

55
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

New York Mets

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

New York Mets

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Toronto Blue Jays

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Toronto Blue Jays

53

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1039–1061 · 49%
-752.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 10c3c60ca44df1a4…
Kickoff
Tue, Jun 30 · 23:07 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 7805,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-30T23:07:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 23:07:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "New York Mets",
        "home": "Toronto Blue Jays"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →