Tommy PaulvsChak Lam Coleman Wong
CLAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Tommy Paul 5/5 models |
Under 3.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Tommy Paul |
62%
Under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Tommy Paul Tommy Paul is a top-100 ATP player with established hard-court pedigree and multiple US Open appearances; Wong is a lower-ranked player maki...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Under 3.5 US Open men's singles is best-of-five, but early-round matchups between a top-100 player and a lower-ranked opponent typically feature a cle... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
82%
Tommy Paul |
71%
under_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Tommy Paul Tommy Paul is a top-20 ATP player with strong hard-court results while Chak Lam Coleman Wong remains a low-ranked journeyman. Paul's experie...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
71%
under_3.5 Paul's recent slam performances show he routinely dispatches lower-ranked players in straight sets or four. Wong lacks the firepower to push... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
85%
Tommy Paul |
60%
Under 3.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Tommy Paul Tommy Paul is a significantly more experienced and higher-ranked player on the ATP tour, particularly on hard courts. His power game and Gra...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 3.5 sets Given Tommy Paul's superior ranking, experience, and form on hard courts, a straight-sets victory (3-0) is the most probable outcome. While... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
85%
Tommy Paul |
75%
2.0 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Tommy Paul Tommy Paul is a significantly higher-ranked and more experienced player, particularly on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
2.0 Given Tommy Paul's strong advantage in this matchup, it's highly probable he will win in straight sets. While Wong might occasionally challe... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
78%
Tommy Paul |
60%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Tommy Paul Based on training data through mid-2025, Tommy Paul is a top-15 player with strong hard-court results, while Wong is a qualifier ranked outs...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 While Paul is favored, Wong's aggressive first-strike tennis and lack of pressure as an underdog could extend the match. Wong has shown he c... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusTommy Paul 5/5
Tommy Paul is a top-100 ATP player with established hard-court pedigree and multiple US Open appearances; Wong is a lower-ranked player maki...
Tommy Paul is a top-20 ATP player with strong hard-court results while Chak Lam Coleman Wong remains a low-ranked journeyman. Paul's experie...
Tommy Paul is a significantly more experienced and higher-ranked player on the ATP tour, particularly on hard courts. His power game and Gra...
Tommy Paul is a significantly higher-ranked and more experienced player, particularly on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open....
Based on training data through mid-2025, Tommy Paul is a top-15 player with strong hard-court results, while Wong is a qualifier ranked outs...
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 3.5 1/10
US Open men's singles is best-of-five, but early-round matchups between a top-100 player and a lower-ranked opponent typically feature a cle...
Paul's recent slam performances show he routinely dispatches lower-ranked players in straight sets or four. Wong lacks the firepower to push...
Given Tommy Paul's superior ranking, experience, and form on hard courts, a straight-sets victory (3-0) is the most probable outcome. While...
Given Tommy Paul's strong advantage in this matchup, it's highly probable he will win in straight sets. While Wong might occasionally challe...
While Paul is favored, Wong's aggressive first-strike tennis and lack of pressure as an underdog could extend the match. Wong has shown he c...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Tommy Paul
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Tommy Paul
Grok 4 Fast
Tommy Paul
DeepSeek V3
Tommy Paul
Claude Haiku 4.5
Tommy Paul
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
95fa0a65e45515f6…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 30 · 17:15 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 33682,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T16:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 16:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Chak Lam Coleman Wong",
"home": "Tommy Paul"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.