Tomas MachacvsToby Samuel
TSAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
under 3/10 models |
Tomas Machac 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
65%
Over 2.5 |
72%
Tomas Machac |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 2.5 Given the likely disparity in ranking and tour experience, Machac should be favored to win in straight sets (2–0). However, Samuel may steal...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Tomas Machac Machac is a established ATP player with multiple tour-level wins and consistent hard-court performance, while Samuel is a lesser-known quali... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
78%
under |
92%
Tomas Machac |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
78%
under Large ability gap on hard courts typically produces straight-set wins. Machac's serve and return should limit sets to two or three. Fatigue...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
92%
Tomas Machac Tomas Machac is an established ATP top-30 player with strong hard-court results while Toby Samuel has no meaningful ATP-level results enteri... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Under 3.5 Sets |
75%
Tomas Machac |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 3.5 Sets Given Machac's superiority on hard courts and Grand Slam experience, he is likely to win this match efficiently. A straight-sets victory (3-...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Tomas Machac Based on my training data through 2025-09, Tomas Machac is a significantly more experienced and higher-ranked player than Toby Samuel, espec... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
75%
2.5 |
90%
Tomas Machac |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
2.5 Given Machac's significant advantage in skill and experience, it's highly probable he will win in straight sets. While Samuel might occasion...
2 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
90%
Tomas Machac Tomas Machac is significantly higher ranked and has a much more established professional career, including ATP Tour-level success. Toby Samu...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
61%
Under 36.5 games |
82%
Tomas Machac |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
Under 36.5 games In a mismatch, games total tends to stay low as the favorite dominates service games and breaks often. Machac's efficient serving and Samuel...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Tomas Machac Tomas Machac is a top-30 player with a strong hard-court game, while Toby Samuel is a qualifier with limited tour experience. Machac's super... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusunder 3/10
Given the likely disparity in ranking and tour experience, Machac should be favored to win in straight sets (2–0). However, Samuel may steal...
Large ability gap on hard courts typically produces straight-set wins. Machac's serve and return should limit sets to two or three. Fatigue...
Given Machac's superiority on hard courts and Grand Slam experience, he is likely to win this match efficiently. A straight-sets victory (3-...
Given Machac's significant advantage in skill and experience, it's highly probable he will win in straight sets. While Samuel might occasion...
In a mismatch, games total tends to stay low as the favorite dominates service games and breaks often. Machac's efficient serving and Samuel...
Match winner
ConsensusTomas Machac 5/5
Machac is a established ATP player with multiple tour-level wins and consistent hard-court performance, while Samuel is a lesser-known quali...
Tomas Machac is an established ATP top-30 player with strong hard-court results while Toby Samuel has no meaningful ATP-level results enteri...
Based on my training data through 2025-09, Tomas Machac is a significantly more experienced and higher-ranked player than Toby Samuel, espec...
Tomas Machac is significantly higher ranked and has a much more established professional career, including ATP Tour-level success. Toby Samu...
Tomas Machac is a top-30 player with a strong hard-court game, while Toby Samuel is a qualifier with limited tour experience. Machac's super...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Tomas Machac
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Tomas Machac
DeepSeek V3
Tomas Machac
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Tomas Machac
Claude Haiku 4.5
Tomas Machac
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
9772c12480adc28d…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 30 · 19:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 33681,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T17:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Toby Samuel",
"home": "Tomas Machac"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.