Tomas Barrios VeravsJuan Carlos Prado Angelo
JCYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Tomas Barrios Vera 5/5 models |
under 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Tomas Barrios Vera |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Tomas Barrios Vera Both players are ranked outside the top 100 and have limited public profile data available. Barrios Vera, a Chilean player, has historically...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 At the challenger/early-round level, matches rarely feature blow-outs; most contests go at least three sets. Both Barrios Vera and Prado Ang... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
Tomas Barrios Vera |
62%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Tomas Barrios Vera Barrios Vera holds a higher ranking and stronger recent results on hard courts than Prado Angelo. The Chilean has more experience at Grand S...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under Barrios Vera is the clear favorite and should close the match in straight sets on home-surface conditions. Both players lack elite serve dom... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Tomas Barrios Vera |
40%
4 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Tomas Barrios Vera Based on training data up to my last update, Tomas Barrios Vera has more experience on the ATP tour and in Grand Slams compared to the young...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
40%
4 Sets While Tomas Barrios Vera is the more experienced player and likely favorite, Juan Carlos Prado Angelo, as a developing talent, is capable of... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Tomas Barrios Vera |
60%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Tomas Barrios Vera Based on training data up to 2025, Tomas Barrios Vera has generally shown a stronger professional record and more consistent performance on...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Given the relative parity often seen in Grand Slam first-round matches, and my assessment that Barrios Vera has a slight edge, there's a rea... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Tomas Barrios Vera |
60%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Tomas Barrios Vera Tomas Barrios Vera has more experience on hard courts and a higher career ranking, which should give him an edge in this US Open first-round...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 This is a first-round Grand Slam match between two players with limited experience at this level, which often leads to tight, competitive se... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusTomas Barrios Vera 5/5
Both players are ranked outside the top 100 and have limited public profile data available. Barrios Vera, a Chilean player, has historically...
Barrios Vera holds a higher ranking and stronger recent results on hard courts than Prado Angelo. The Chilean has more experience at Grand S...
Based on training data up to my last update, Tomas Barrios Vera has more experience on the ATP tour and in Grand Slams compared to the young...
Based on training data up to 2025, Tomas Barrios Vera has generally shown a stronger professional record and more consistent performance on...
Tomas Barrios Vera has more experience on hard courts and a higher career ranking, which should give him an edge in this US Open first-round...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2/10
At the challenger/early-round level, matches rarely feature blow-outs; most contests go at least three sets. Both Barrios Vera and Prado Ang...
Barrios Vera is the clear favorite and should close the match in straight sets on home-surface conditions. Both players lack elite serve dom...
While Tomas Barrios Vera is the more experienced player and likely favorite, Juan Carlos Prado Angelo, as a developing talent, is capable of...
Given the relative parity often seen in Grand Slam first-round matches, and my assessment that Barrios Vera has a slight edge, there's a rea...
This is a first-round Grand Slam match between two players with limited experience at this level, which often leads to tight, competitive se...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Tomas Barrios Vera
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Tomas Barrios Vera
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Tomas Barrios Vera
Claude Haiku 4.5
Tomas Barrios Vera
DeepSeek V3
Tomas Barrios Vera
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
788e290425c01ee6…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 16:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30789,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T16:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 16:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Juan Carlos Prado Angelo",
"home": "Tomas Barrios Vera"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.