Tomas Barrios VeravsGenaro Alberto Olivieri
GAAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Tomas Barrios Vera 5/5 models |
under 3.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Tomas Barrios Vera |
62%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Tomas Barrios Vera Both players are lower-ranked ATP prospects competing in US Open qualifying or early rounds on hard court. Barrios Vera (Chilean) has shown...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 Both players are lower-ranked ATP touring professionals with comparable hard-court skill levels and serve-return capabilities. Matches betwe... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
72%
Tomas Barrios Vera |
61%
under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Tomas Barrios Vera Tomas Barrios Vera holds the higher ranking and better hard-court results in recent seasons compared to Olivieri. The Chilean has shown stro...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
under 3.5 Best-of-five format at US Open favors the higher-ranked player finishing in straight or four sets. Barrios Vera's superior movement on hard... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Tomas Barrios Vera |
70%
Over 3.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Tomas Barrios Vera Based on my training data up to my last update, Tomas Barrios Vera, while primarily a clay-court specialist like Olivieri, has shown a margi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 3.5 sets Given both players are more comfortable on clay, their performance on hard courts is likely to be inconsistent, leading to potential momentu... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
57%
Tomas Barrios Vera |
59%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
57%
Tomas Barrios Vera Tomas Barrios Vera is a more established player on the ATP tour and generally performs better on hard courts. While Olivieri has shown flash...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
59%
2.5 This is expected to be a closely contested match between two players of similar caliber on hard courts. A three-set match is the most likely... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
72%
Tomas Barrios Vera |
55%
under_4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Tomas Barrios Vera Training data through 2025-09 suggests Barrios Vera holds a significant edge on hard courts, with superior serve and consistent baseline pla...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under_4.5 Given Barrios Vera's superiority on this surface, a straight-sets victory is likely. Olivieri's weaker hard-court play reduces his chances o... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusTomas Barrios Vera 5/5
Both players are lower-ranked ATP prospects competing in US Open qualifying or early rounds on hard court. Barrios Vera (Chilean) has shown...
Tomas Barrios Vera holds the higher ranking and better hard-court results in recent seasons compared to Olivieri. The Chilean has shown stro...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Tomas Barrios Vera, while primarily a clay-court specialist like Olivieri, has shown a margi...
Tomas Barrios Vera is a more established player on the ATP tour and generally performs better on hard courts. While Olivieri has shown flash...
Training data through 2025-09 suggests Barrios Vera holds a significant edge on hard courts, with superior serve and consistent baseline pla...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 3.5 1/10
Both players are lower-ranked ATP touring professionals with comparable hard-court skill levels and serve-return capabilities. Matches betwe...
Best-of-five format at US Open favors the higher-ranked player finishing in straight or four sets. Barrios Vera's superior movement on hard...
Given both players are more comfortable on clay, their performance on hard courts is likely to be inconsistent, leading to potential momentu...
This is expected to be a closely contested match between two players of similar caliber on hard courts. A three-set match is the most likely...
Given Barrios Vera's superiority on this surface, a straight-sets victory is likely. Olivieri's weaker hard-court play reduces his chances o...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Tomas Barrios Vera
DeepSeek V3
Tomas Barrios Vera
Claude Haiku 4.5
Tomas Barrios Vera
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Tomas Barrios Vera
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Tomas Barrios Vera
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
8fd90ead65b009d9…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 15:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31104,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Genaro Alberto Olivieri",
"home": "Tomas Barrios Vera"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.