Tomas Barrios VeravsDaniel Rincon
DRAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Tomas Barrios Vera 5/5 models |
over 4/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Tomas Barrios Vera |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Tomas Barrios Vera Barrios Vera is a Chilean professional with established ATP ranking and hard-court experience, while Rincon is a Colombian player with lower...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Early-round US Open matches between unseeded or lower-ranked players often go to 3 or 4 sets as both competitors have relatively even skill... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Tomas Barrios Vera |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Tomas Barrios Vera Tomas Barrios Vera holds the higher ranking and better hard-court results in recent seasons per training data through 2025. Daniel Rincon re...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Best-of-5 format at US Open favors longer matches when both players have solid serves. Barrios Vera's consistency and Rincon's youth suggest... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
62%
Tomas Barrios Vera |
70%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Tomas Barrios Vera Based on my training data up to my last update, Tomas Barrios Vera has a more established professional career with better consistency at hig...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 3.5 Sets Although Barrios Vera is favored, Rincon has shown potential and a fighting spirit in his matches from my training data, suggesting he is ca... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Tomas Barrios Vera |
60%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Tomas Barrios Vera Tomas Barrios Vera is a more established player on the ATP tour, particularly on hard courts. While Daniel Rincon shows promise, Barrios Ver...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both players have shown the ability to win sets, and their head-to-head history (based on general tour performance) suggests competitive mat... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Tomas Barrios Vera |
55%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Tomas Barrios Vera Based on training data through early 2025, Barrios Vera has higher career highs and more experience on hard courts, while Rincon primarily p...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 3.5 Both players are competitive and not top seeds, so a four-set match is plausible. Barrios Vera might win in four sets given his experience,... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusTomas Barrios Vera 5/5
Barrios Vera is a Chilean professional with established ATP ranking and hard-court experience, while Rincon is a Colombian player with lower...
Tomas Barrios Vera holds the higher ranking and better hard-court results in recent seasons per training data through 2025. Daniel Rincon re...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Tomas Barrios Vera has a more established professional career with better consistency at hig...
Tomas Barrios Vera is a more established player on the ATP tour, particularly on hard courts. While Daniel Rincon shows promise, Barrios Ver...
Based on training data through early 2025, Barrios Vera has higher career highs and more experience on hard courts, while Rincon primarily p...
Over / Under
Consensusover 4/10
Early-round US Open matches between unseeded or lower-ranked players often go to 3 or 4 sets as both competitors have relatively even skill...
Best-of-5 format at US Open favors longer matches when both players have solid serves. Barrios Vera's consistency and Rincon's youth suggest...
Although Barrios Vera is favored, Rincon has shown potential and a fighting spirit in his matches from my training data, suggesting he is ca...
Both players have shown the ability to win sets, and their head-to-head history (based on general tour performance) suggests competitive mat...
Both players are competitive and not top seeds, so a four-set match is plausible. Barrios Vera might win in four sets given his experience,...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Tomas Barrios Vera
Grok 4 Fast
Tomas Barrios Vera
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Tomas Barrios Vera
DeepSeek V3
Tomas Barrios Vera
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Tomas Barrios Vera
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
c062d24b4a789827…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Aug 27 · 15:45 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31657,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Daniel Rincon",
"home": "Tomas Barrios Vera"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.