Texas RangersvsNew York Mets
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
New York Mets 3/4 models |
New York Mets 3/4 models |
Over 8.5 2/4 models |
New York Mets -1.5 2/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Texas Rangers |
54%
Texas Rangers |
52%
over |
51%
Texas Rangers -1.5 |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Texas Rangers Training data through 2025-09 shows home teams hold small first-five advantage in neutral park factors. Early innings favor the starter with...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
Texas Rangers Training data through 2025-09 shows Rangers with slight home edge at Globe Life Field against lefty-heavy lineups. Mets recent form indicate...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Training data through 2025-09 indicates Globe Life Field plays slightly above average for runs with roof closed. Both teams average 4.6+ run...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Texas Rangers -1.5 Training data through 2025-09 gives Rangers narrow home favorite status. Mets road splits historically weaker. Expect close game but slight... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
42%
New York Mets |
53%
New York Mets |
55%
Over 8.5 |
52%
New York Mets -1.5 |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
42%
New York Mets Based on my training data through 2025-09, the New York Mets' recent offensive form suggests they are more likely to get off to a quick star...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
New York Mets Based on my training data up to 2025-09, the New York Mets show slightly better recent form (3W-2L vs 2W-3L) and a more potent offense. Desp...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 My analysis, based on training data through 2025-09, suggests a high-scoring game. The New York Mets have been involved in high-scoring affa...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
New York Mets -1.5 Drawing from my training data up to 2025-09, if the Mets' offense performs as expected, they have the capability to win by more than a singl... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
New York Mets |
60%
New York Mets |
55%
over |
55%
New York Mets |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
58%
New York Mets The Mets' starting pitcher is expected to have a better performance in the early innings compared to the Rangers' likely starter. Coupled wi...
4 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
New York Mets The New York Mets have a stronger recent offensive output and their implied starting pitcher is in better form than the Texas Rangers'. The...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown inconsistent pitching and have been involved in games with higher run totals recently. The Mets' offense is capable of...
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
New York Mets Given the slight edge to the Mets in the head-to-head matchup and their better offensive potential, they are favored to cover the -1 spread....
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
52%
New York Mets |
54%
New York Mets |
52%
Over 8.5 |
32%
New York Mets -1.5 |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
New York Mets First-five-innings markets hinge on starting pitchers, and no confirmed starters or live research are available for this 2026 date. Based on...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
New York Mets No live tools are available for this future MLB matchup (2026-09-23), so this is predicted from training data through 2025-09 and the suppli...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 8.5 Both teams have shown leaky pitching/run prevention in the supplied form data, with the Mets conceding 47 runs and Rangers 29 over their las...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
32%
New York Mets -1.5 Run-line predictions in baseball are inherently low-probability for the favorite covering -1.5, and without confirmed starting pitchers or l... |
|||||
First 5 innings
ConsensusNew York Mets 3/4
Training data through 2025-09 shows home teams hold small first-five advantage in neutral park factors. Early innings favor the starter with...
Based on my training data through 2025-09, the New York Mets' recent offensive form suggests they are more likely to get off to a quick star...
The Mets' starting pitcher is expected to have a better performance in the early innings compared to the Rangers' likely starter. Coupled wi...
First-five-innings markets hinge on starting pitchers, and no confirmed starters or live research are available for this 2026 date. Based on...
Match winner
ConsensusNew York Mets 3/4
Training data through 2025-09 shows Rangers with slight home edge at Globe Life Field against lefty-heavy lineups. Mets recent form indicate...
Based on my training data up to 2025-09, the New York Mets show slightly better recent form (3W-2L vs 2W-3L) and a more potent offense. Desp...
The New York Mets have a stronger recent offensive output and their implied starting pitcher is in better form than the Texas Rangers'. The...
No live tools are available for this future MLB matchup (2026-09-23), so this is predicted from training data through 2025-09 and the suppli...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 8.5 2/4
Training data through 2025-09 indicates Globe Life Field plays slightly above average for runs with roof closed. Both teams average 4.6+ run...
My analysis, based on training data through 2025-09, suggests a high-scoring game. The New York Mets have been involved in high-scoring affa...
Both teams have shown inconsistent pitching and have been involved in games with higher run totals recently. The Mets' offense is capable of...
Both teams have shown leaky pitching/run prevention in the supplied form data, with the Mets conceding 47 runs and Rangers 29 over their las...
Spread
ConsensusNew York Mets -1.5 2/4
Training data through 2025-09 gives Rangers narrow home favorite status. Mets road splits historically weaker. Expect close game but slight...
Drawing from my training data up to 2025-09, if the Mets' offense performs as expected, they have the capability to win by more than a singl...
Given the slight edge to the Mets in the head-to-head matchup and their better offensive potential, they are favored to cover the -1 spread....
Run-line predictions in baseball are inherently low-probability for the favorite covering -1.5, and without confirmed starting pitchers or l...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
New York Mets
Grok 4 Fast
Texas Rangers
DeepSeek V3
New York Mets
Gemini 2.5 Flash
New York Mets
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
9d7550c214a343ee…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 23 · 00:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 46417,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "Globe Life Field",
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-09-23T00:05:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:05:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "New York Mets",
"home": "Texas Rangers"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WLWWL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 38,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 47
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LWLLW",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 22,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 29
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 76,
"home": 76
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.