Tessa Johanna BrockmannvsTamara Zidansek
TZAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Tamara Zidansek 5/5 models |
Under 2.5 Sets 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Tamara Zidansek |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Tamara Zidansek Tamara Zidansek has demonstrated superior consistency on hard courts and clay surfaces in the WTA circuit, with a track record of strong per...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Hard-court tennis at the Montreux level typically produces competitive matches with extended rallies and break-point opportunities. Zidansek... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
78%
Tamara Zidansek |
65%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Tamara Zidansek Tamara Zidansek holds a clear ranking and experience edge over Tessa Johanna Brockmann based on pre-2025 WTA results. Zidansek's established...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under_2.5 Zidansek's serve and movement should limit sets to two in most encounters against emerging players. Indoor conditions reduce variance and fa... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
88%
Tamara Zidansek |
75%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
88%
Tamara Zidansek Based on historical WTA rankings and performance data up to my last training update, Tamara Zidansek is a significantly more accomplished pl...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Zidansek's considerable experience and higher skill level, especially on her preferred clay surface, against a much less seasoned oppo... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
95%
Tamara Zidansek |
85%
Tamara Zidansek |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
95%
Tamara Zidansek Tamara Zidansek is significantly higher ranked and has a much stronger professional record than Tessa Johanna Brockmann, who primarily compe...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
85%
Tamara Zidansek Given the significant disparity in skill and ranking between Tamara Zidansek and Tessa Johanna Brockmann, this match is highly likely to con...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
90%
Tamara Zidansek |
90%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
90%
Tamara Zidansek Tamara Zidansek is a seasoned WTA player with career titles and extensive experience across surfaces, whereas Tessa Johanna Brockmann is lik...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
90%
Over 1.5 Given the ranking disparity, a straight-sets win for Zidansek is very likely, but the probability of a competitive second set is not negligi... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusTamara Zidansek 5/5
Tamara Zidansek has demonstrated superior consistency on hard courts and clay surfaces in the WTA circuit, with a track record of strong per...
Tamara Zidansek holds a clear ranking and experience edge over Tessa Johanna Brockmann based on pre-2025 WTA results. Zidansek's established...
Based on historical WTA rankings and performance data up to my last training update, Tamara Zidansek is a significantly more accomplished pl...
Tamara Zidansek is significantly higher ranked and has a much stronger professional record than Tessa Johanna Brockmann, who primarily compe...
Tamara Zidansek is a seasoned WTA player with career titles and extensive experience across surfaces, whereas Tessa Johanna Brockmann is lik...
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 2.5 Sets 1/10
Hard-court tennis at the Montreux level typically produces competitive matches with extended rallies and break-point opportunities. Zidansek...
Zidansek's serve and movement should limit sets to two in most encounters against emerging players. Indoor conditions reduce variance and fa...
Given Zidansek's considerable experience and higher skill level, especially on her preferred clay surface, against a much less seasoned oppo...
Given the significant disparity in skill and ranking between Tamara Zidansek and Tessa Johanna Brockmann, this match is highly likely to con...
Given the ranking disparity, a straight-sets win for Zidansek is very likely, but the probability of a competitive second set is not negligi...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Tamara Zidansek
DeepSeek V3
Tamara Zidansek
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Tamara Zidansek
Grok 4 Fast
Tamara Zidansek
Claude Haiku 4.5
Tamara Zidansek
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
d3e03e3093d19ab6…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Sep 7 · 12:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 38940,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Montreux Nestlé Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-07T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Tamara Zidansek",
"home": "Tessa Johanna Brockmann"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.