Tereza ValentovavsTian Fangran
TFAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 21.5 3/10 models |
Tereza Valentova 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Tereza Valentova |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Without current 2026 rankings or detailed recent form, a slight lean to Over 2.5 assumes competitive women's hard-court tennis at ITF/lower...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Tereza Valentova Tereza Valentova is a Czech player with solid hard-court credentials and typically competes in WTA/ITF events; Tian Fangran is a Chinese pla... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
under_2.5 |
58%
Tereza Valentova |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
under_2.5 Training data through 2025-09 indicates both players often close out matches in straight sets when facing similar opposition. Serve strength...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Tereza Valentova Training data through 2025-09 shows Valentova with stronger recent results on hard courts against comparable ITF-level opponents. Fangran ha... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Over 2.5 |
52%
Tereza Valentova |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Given that both players are still early in their professional careers, matches often feature swings in momentum and consistency issues. This...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Tereza Valentova This match is between two young, developing players with similar career trajectories on the ITF circuit. Based on my training data through 2... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
70%
Tian Fangran |
75%
Tereza Valentova |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Tian Fangran Given Valentova's expected dominance, this match is likely to be decided in straight sets. While Fangran might take a set if Valentova has a...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Tereza Valentova Tereza Valentova is a highly-rated young player with a strong junior and early professional career, known for her aggressive style and power... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Over 21.5 |
62%
Tereza Valentova |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 21.5 With both players likely to hold serve and break occasionally, a three-set match or close two-setter is probable, leading to more than 21.5...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Tereza Valentova Based on training data through 2025-09, Valentova has shown more consistent hard-court form and a higher ranking, while Fangran has been inc... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 21.5 3/10
Without current 2026 rankings or detailed recent form, a slight lean to Over 2.5 assumes competitive women's hard-court tennis at ITF/lower...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates both players often close out matches in straight sets when facing similar opposition. Serve strength...
Given that both players are still early in their professional careers, matches often feature swings in momentum and consistency issues. This...
Given Valentova's expected dominance, this match is likely to be decided in straight sets. While Fangran might take a set if Valentova has a...
With both players likely to hold serve and break occasionally, a three-set match or close two-setter is probable, leading to more than 21.5...
Match winner
ConsensusTereza Valentova 5/5
Tereza Valentova is a Czech player with solid hard-court credentials and typically competes in WTA/ITF events; Tian Fangran is a Chinese pla...
Training data through 2025-09 shows Valentova with stronger recent results on hard courts against comparable ITF-level opponents. Fangran ha...
This match is between two young, developing players with similar career trajectories on the ITF circuit. Based on my training data through 2...
Tereza Valentova is a highly-rated young player with a strong junior and early professional career, known for her aggressive style and power...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Valentova has shown more consistent hard-court form and a higher ranking, while Fangran has been inc...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Tereza Valentova
Claude Haiku 4.5
Tereza Valentova
DeepSeek V3
Tereza Valentova
Grok 4 Fast
Tereza Valentova
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Tereza Valentova
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a76a1bc74380dbba…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 16:55 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31143,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Ennoble Care Philly Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Tian Fangran",
"home": "Tereza Valentova"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.