Tampa Bay LightningvsNashville Predators
NPYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Tampa Bay Lightning 3/4 models |
Tampa Bay Lightning 4/4 models |
over 3/4 models |
home_ -1.5 2/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | |
|
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
51%
Tampa Bay Lightning |
57%
Tampa Bay Lightning |
52%
over |
54%
Tampa Bay Lightning |
|
|
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
51%
Tampa Bay Lightning Lightning tend to start games with strong home-ice pressure and first-period scoring. Nashville has shown slower road starts in past seasons...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
57%
Tampa Bay Lightning Tampa Bay Lightning hold a strong historical home record versus Nashville Predators in regular-season play. Lightning typically leverage hom...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over NHL scoring trends in early season games at Benchmark International Arena have leaned slightly above average totals. Both clubs feature offe...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
Tampa Bay Lightning Tampa's home-ice advantage and depth typically cover a -1.5 puck line against Nashville. Historical matchups show Lightning winning by multi... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
40%
Tampa Bay Lightning |
55%
Tampa Bay Lightning |
55%
under |
52%
home_ -1.5 |
|
|
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
40%
Tampa Bay Lightning Based on training data up to 2025-09, Tampa Bay frequently starts games with high intensity, aiming to establish an early lead on home ice....
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Tampa Bay Lightning Based on training data up to 2025-09, Tampa Bay historically leverages its elite offensive talent and strong goaltending, providing them wit...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under Based on training data up to 2025-09, both teams are known for having elite goaltending, with Andrei Vasilevskiy for Tampa and Juuse Saros f...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
home_ -1.5 Based on training data up to 2025-09, Tampa Bay's offensive capabilities and strong home performance suggest they can secure a multi-goal vi... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
Tampa Bay Lightning |
60%
Tampa Bay Lightning |
55%
over |
52%
Nashville Predators |
|
|
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
58%
Tampa Bay Lightning Tampa Bay often starts games strong at home, feeding off the energy of the crowd. Their offensive prowess and better special teams units giv...
4 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Tampa Bay Lightning Tampa Bay Lightning had a significantly better regular season record, especially at home, compared to the Nashville Predators. Tampa Bay als...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have capable offenses, and the opening odds suggest a relatively close game. Tampa Bay's home-ice advantage and generally strong...
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Nashville Predators While Tampa Bay is favored to win, the spread often implies a larger margin of victory. Nashville, despite being the underdog, has the offen...
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
45%
home_first_period |
52%
Tampa Bay Lightning |
55%
over |
40%
home_ -1.5 |
|
|
First period winner
?
First period winner
First-period winner. Who is ahead at the end of the first period.
45%
home_first_period No live access; using training data through early 2025. Home teams in the NHL slightly overperform in first periods due to matching advantag...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Tampa Bay Lightning No live access; predicting from training data through early 2025. Tampa Bay has consistently been the stronger home side with elite top-six...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over No live access; using training data through early 2025. Tampa Bay home games have tended to see above-average goal totals because of their d...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
home_ -1.5 No live access; using training data through early 2025. While Tampa Bay is the stronger side, covering a -1.5 puck line is a tall order in t... |
|||||
First period winner
ConsensusTampa Bay Lightning 3/4
Lightning tend to start games with strong home-ice pressure and first-period scoring. Nashville has shown slower road starts in past seasons...
Based on training data up to 2025-09, Tampa Bay frequently starts games with high intensity, aiming to establish an early lead on home ice....
Tampa Bay often starts games strong at home, feeding off the energy of the crowd. Their offensive prowess and better special teams units giv...
No live access; using training data through early 2025. Home teams in the NHL slightly overperform in first periods due to matching advantag...
Match winner
ConsensusTampa Bay Lightning 4/4
Tampa Bay Lightning hold a strong historical home record versus Nashville Predators in regular-season play. Lightning typically leverage hom...
Based on training data up to 2025-09, Tampa Bay historically leverages its elite offensive talent and strong goaltending, providing them wit...
Tampa Bay Lightning had a significantly better regular season record, especially at home, compared to the Nashville Predators. Tampa Bay als...
No live access; predicting from training data through early 2025. Tampa Bay has consistently been the stronger home side with elite top-six...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/4
NHL scoring trends in early season games at Benchmark International Arena have leaned slightly above average totals. Both clubs feature offe...
Based on training data up to 2025-09, both teams are known for having elite goaltending, with Andrei Vasilevskiy for Tampa and Juuse Saros f...
Both teams have capable offenses, and the opening odds suggest a relatively close game. Tampa Bay's home-ice advantage and generally strong...
No live access; using training data through early 2025. Tampa Bay home games have tended to see above-average goal totals because of their d...
Spread
Consensushome_ -1.5 2/4
Tampa's home-ice advantage and depth typically cover a -1.5 puck line against Nashville. Historical matchups show Lightning winning by multi...
Based on training data up to 2025-09, Tampa Bay's offensive capabilities and strong home performance suggest they can secure a multi-goal vi...
While Tampa Bay is favored to win, the spread often implies a larger margin of victory. Nashville, despite being the underdog, has the offen...
No live access; using training data through early 2025. While Tampa Bay is the stronger side, covering a -1.5 puck line is a tall order in t...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Tampa Bay Lightning
Grok 4 Fast
Tampa Bay Lightning
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Tampa Bay Lightning
DeepSeek V3
Tampa Bay Lightning
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
1ee20b34006d3e71…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Sep 20 · 21:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First period winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_period
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 44367,
"sport": "ice-hockey",
"venue": "Benchmark International Arena",
"league": "NHL",
"starts_at": "2026-09-20T21:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Nashville Predators",
"home": "Tampa Bay Lightning"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Confirm the starting goaltender and their recent save% — a backup or a cold starter swings the line and total.",
"Special teams decide tight games: compare power-play and penalty-kill percentages.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause goalie/skater fatigue — flag the schedule spot.",
"Weigh recent scoring trends and home/road splits; injuries to top-six forwards or a top pairing matter most."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_period"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.