Tamara KorpatschvsLilli Tagger
LTAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Tamara Korpatsch 4/5 models |
Under 2.5 Sets 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Tamara Korpatsch |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Tamara Korpatsch Korpatsch is a seasoned WTA player with consistent hard-court performance and a proven ability to compete in Grand Slam environments, while...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 US Open first-round women's matches on hard courts typically run to at least 3 sets when there is a meaningful skill gap. Tagger's competiti... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Lilli Tagger |
52%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Lilli Tagger Lilli Tagger is the younger and higher-upside player entering 2026 with strong recent results on hard courts. Tamara Korpatsch has experienc...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over 2.5 Both players have solid serves but inconsistent return games on hard. Expect competitive sets with the younger Tagger pushing to three sets.... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Tamara Korpatsch |
55%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Tamara Korpatsch Predictions are based on my training data up to my last update, as specific real-time information for this future event in 2026, including p...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 Sets Based on Korpatsch being the more experienced player, a straight-sets victory (Under 2.5 sets) is marginally more probable, assuming Tagger... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Tamara Korpatsch |
65%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Tamara Korpatsch Tamara Korpatsch is generally a more accomplished player on the WTA tour, with a higher career-high ranking and more consistent performances...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
2.5 Given that Tamara Korpatsch is the favored player, the match is likely to be decided in two sets. However, Lilli Tagger is capable of taking... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
68%
Tamara Korpatsch |
62%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Tamara Korpatsch Based on training data through 2025, Tamara Korpatsch is a more experienced WTA player with a higher ranking and better results on hard cour...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Under 2.5 Given Korpatsch's experience and higher ranking, she is likely to win in straight sets, making under 2.5 sets the more probable outcome. Tag... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusTamara Korpatsch 4/5
Korpatsch is a seasoned WTA player with consistent hard-court performance and a proven ability to compete in Grand Slam environments, while...
Lilli Tagger is the younger and higher-upside player entering 2026 with strong recent results on hard courts. Tamara Korpatsch has experienc...
Predictions are based on my training data up to my last update, as specific real-time information for this future event in 2026, including p...
Tamara Korpatsch is generally a more accomplished player on the WTA tour, with a higher career-high ranking and more consistent performances...
Based on training data through 2025, Tamara Korpatsch is a more experienced WTA player with a higher ranking and better results on hard cour...
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 2.5 Sets 1/10
US Open first-round women's matches on hard courts typically run to at least 3 sets when there is a meaningful skill gap. Tagger's competiti...
Both players have solid serves but inconsistent return games on hard. Expect competitive sets with the younger Tagger pushing to three sets....
Based on Korpatsch being the more experienced player, a straight-sets victory (Under 2.5 sets) is marginally more probable, assuming Tagger...
Given that Tamara Korpatsch is the favored player, the match is likely to be decided in two sets. However, Lilli Tagger is capable of taking...
Given Korpatsch's experience and higher ranking, she is likely to win in straight sets, making under 2.5 sets the more probable outcome. Tag...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Tamara Korpatsch
Claude Haiku 4.5
Tamara Korpatsch
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Tamara Korpatsch
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Tamara Korpatsch
Grok 4 Fast
Lilli Tagger
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
d0bb63f44801cc30…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 15:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31807,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Lilli Tagger",
"home": "Tamara Korpatsch"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.