Suzan LamensvsKayla Day
KDAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Kayla Day 2/5 models |
Over 1.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Kayla Day |
62%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Kayla Day Kayla Day is the higher-ranked player (WTA top 100 vs. Lamens who typically ranks outside top 150) and has more consistent hard-court form....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 1.5 While Day is favoured, Lamens is a persistent defender with solid clay and hard-court baseline consistency. The ranking gap is not enormous... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Suzan Lamens |
62%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Suzan Lamens Suzan Lamens holds a slight edge on hard courts based on career patterns through 2025. Kayla Day has shown inconsistency in recent seasons....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under_2.5 Both players prefer shorter matches and strong serving reduces set extensions. Historical data shows most encounters end in straight sets at... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Kayla Day |
52%
Over 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Kayla Day Based on general career performance from training data up to my last update, Kayla Day often demonstrates a higher ceiling on hard courts wi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 Sets This match is anticipated to be competitive based on the players' profiles from my training data. Although Kayla Day is slightly favored, Su... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Day |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Day Based on training data through 2025-09, Kayla Day is generally the more established player with a higher historical performance level, sugge...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Predicting from training data through 2025-09, this matchup between Day and Lamens is likely to be closely contested. Given their general pe... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Suzan Lamens |
70%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Suzan Lamens Based on training data through 2025-09, Lamens shows consistent form on hard courts, winning ~65% of her main-draw matches in 2025. Day has...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 1.5 Both players possess competitive baseline games and have shown ability to push matches to three sets, especially on hard courts. Their head-... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusKayla Day 2/5
Kayla Day is the higher-ranked player (WTA top 100 vs. Lamens who typically ranks outside top 150) and has more consistent hard-court form....
Suzan Lamens holds a slight edge on hard courts based on career patterns through 2025. Kayla Day has shown inconsistency in recent seasons....
Based on general career performance from training data up to my last update, Kayla Day often demonstrates a higher ceiling on hard courts wi...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Kayla Day is generally the more established player with a higher historical performance level, sugge...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Lamens shows consistent form on hard courts, winning ~65% of her main-draw matches in 2025. Day has...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 1.5 2/10
While Day is favoured, Lamens is a persistent defender with solid clay and hard-court baseline consistency. The ranking gap is not enormous...
Both players prefer shorter matches and strong serving reduces set extensions. Historical data shows most encounters end in straight sets at...
This match is anticipated to be competitive based on the players' profiles from my training data. Although Kayla Day is slightly favored, Su...
Predicting from training data through 2025-09, this matchup between Day and Lamens is likely to be closely contested. Given their general pe...
Both players possess competitive baseline games and have shown ability to push matches to three sets, especially on hard courts. Their head-...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Day
Claude Haiku 4.5
Kayla Day
Grok 4 Fast
Suzan Lamens
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Kayla Day
DeepSeek V3
Suzan Lamens
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
3943db9a4b1bcec4…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Sep 7 · 18:25 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 38999,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Kia Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-07T16:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 07 Sep 2026 16:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Kayla Day",
"home": "Suzan Lamens"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.