Suzan LamensvsArantxa Rus
ARAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over_2.5 2/10 models |
Suzan Lamens 2/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Arantxa Rus |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Best-of-three women's singles matches at the US Open are typically competitive in the opening round or early main draw. Even if Rus is favor...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Arantxa Rus Arantxa Rus is the higher-ranked player with more extensive Grand Slam experience and a proven hard-court game; Suzan Lamens is a qualifier... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
over_2.5 |
58%
Suzan Lamens |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over_2.5 Training data shows these two players often split early sets on hard courts leading to three-set matches. Neither dominates consistently eno...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Suzan Lamens From training data through 2024 Suzan Lamens holds a slight edge over Arantxa Rus on hard courts due to better movement and recent consisten... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Over 2.5 |
65%
Arantxa Rus |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 I predict Over 2.5 sets in this match. Arantxa Rus's game, while solid, can sometimes be vulnerable on hard courts, making it plausible for...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Arantxa Rus Arantxa Rus, historically the higher-ranked and more experienced player on the WTA Tour, is favored against Suzan Lamens. While hard courts... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
over |
65%
Lamens |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over Given the historical head-to-head and their playing styles, a close match is anticipated. While Lamens is favored, Rus has the capability to...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Lamens Based on training data, Suzan Lamens has a historical edge over Arantxa Rus in head-to-head encounters on hard court surfaces. Lamens' game... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
over_2.5 |
62%
Suzan Lamens |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 Both players are capable of winning sets, and their matches often go to three sets, especially on hard courts where rallies are extended. Wi...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Suzan Lamens Training data through 2025-09: Suzan Lamens has been in better form on hard courts, while Arantxa Rus tends to struggle against younger, agg... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusover_2.5 2/10
Best-of-three women's singles matches at the US Open are typically competitive in the opening round or early main draw. Even if Rus is favor...
Training data shows these two players often split early sets on hard courts leading to three-set matches. Neither dominates consistently eno...
I predict Over 2.5 sets in this match. Arantxa Rus's game, while solid, can sometimes be vulnerable on hard courts, making it plausible for...
Given the historical head-to-head and their playing styles, a close match is anticipated. While Lamens is favored, Rus has the capability to...
Both players are capable of winning sets, and their matches often go to three sets, especially on hard courts where rallies are extended. Wi...
Match winner
ConsensusSuzan Lamens 2/5
Arantxa Rus is the higher-ranked player with more extensive Grand Slam experience and a proven hard-court game; Suzan Lamens is a qualifier...
From training data through 2024 Suzan Lamens holds a slight edge over Arantxa Rus on hard courts due to better movement and recent consisten...
Arantxa Rus, historically the higher-ranked and more experienced player on the WTA Tour, is favored against Suzan Lamens. While hard courts...
Based on training data, Suzan Lamens has a historical edge over Arantxa Rus in head-to-head encounters on hard court surfaces. Lamens' game...
Training data through 2025-09: Suzan Lamens has been in better form on hard courts, while Arantxa Rus tends to struggle against younger, agg...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Arantxa Rus
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Lamens
Claude Haiku 4.5
Arantxa Rus
DeepSeek V3
Suzan Lamens
Grok 4 Fast
Suzan Lamens
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
3b3cd665d0fdd55c…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 19:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31159,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T18:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 18:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Arantxa Rus",
"home": "Suzan Lamens"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.