Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 1–6
St.Louis Cardinals logo

St.Louis CardinalsvsSan Diego Padres

San Diego Padres logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final1–6 Locked 28picks · 15 graded
Recap Consensus missed

St.Louis Cardinals 1–6 San Diego Padres

6 of 7 AIs leaned St.Louis Cardinals — reality had other ideas.

AI lean
St.Louis Cardinals 6/7
Correct calls
1/7
Final
1–6

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Under 8.5

MLB games in mid-June typically lean slightly toward lower totals when faced with uncertainty; both teams' starting pitchers and bullpen hea...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over L

Both teams have potent offenses and have consistently exceeded 8.5 runs in recent matchups. The ballpark conditions are conducive to scoring...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% over

Both teams feature lineups capable of scoring in the middle of the order based on 2025 trends. June games at neutral venues tend to produce...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% Under 8.5 W

Predicting for a common MLB total of 8.5 runs. Historically, both teams have had periods of strong pitching. Without knowing the specific st...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over

Both teams have shown a tendency for moderate scoring games. While not consistently high-scoring, the offenses combined with pitching matchu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 75% Over 2.5 W

MLB games average around 4-5 runs per game, and both offenses are capable. Over 2.5 hits in over 95% of games historically. With no weather...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
St.Louis Cardinals 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% St.Louis Cardinals L

As of my training data (September 2025), the Cardinals have been a stronger team in recent seasons with better depth and consistency, though...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% St.Louis Cardinals L

The St. Louis Cardinals have a strong home advantage, with a favorable head-to-head record against the San Diego Padres. Recent form and lin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% St.Louis Cardinals L

St. Louis Cardinals hold a slight home edge in neutral conditions based on historical patterns through 2025. Padres have shown inconsistency...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% St.Louis Cardinals L

Based on general historical strength and the customary home-field advantage in MLB, the Cardinals are given a slight edge. Without specific...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% St.Louis Cardinals L

Based on training data, the St. Louis Cardinals have historically performed slightly better at home against the San Diego Padres. While the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% San Diego Padres W

The Padres have a stronger roster on paper, but the Cardinals have home-field advantage. My training data through 2025 suggests the Padres h...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
St.Louis Cardinals 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 53% St.Louis Cardinals -1.5 L

Consistent with the h2h lean toward St. Louis at home, a modest -1.5 spread reflects a slight home-field advantage and historical franchise...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 50% St.Louis Cardinals L

The game is expected to be closely contested, with both teams having similar recent performances. The spread is likely to be tight.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% St.Louis Cardinals

Cardinals benefit from home field in run-line markets historically. Padres road performance against left-leaning pitching staffs has been be...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% San Diego Padres +1.5 W

While the Cardinals are favored to win outright, covering the -1.5 run line in baseball is challenging due to the frequent occurrence of one...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% San Diego Padres

Given the slight lean towards the Cardinals in head-to-head and the overall game total being close to the average, the spread is expected to...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 45% San Diego Padres -1 W

Padres are favorites but run line coverage is less certain. The Padres winning by more than one is plausible but not a given, so confidence...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
St.Louis Cardinals 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Under 4.5

Early-inning totals tend to correlate with starting pitcher quality and team offensive firepower in the first few frames. Without knowledge...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% St.Louis Cardinals

The Cardinals have a strong first-inning performance at home, often taking an early lead. The Padres have struggled in the first five inning...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% St.Louis Cardinals

Early game edges lean toward the home starter in this matchup per 2025 patterns. Both clubs deploy solid top-of-order bats but Cardinals hol...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 38% St.Louis Cardinals

This market heavily depends on the starting pitchers, which are unknown for June 2026. Given the home-field advantage and general historical...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 51% San Diego Padres

Padres' starting pitchers have historically shown better performance in the early innings compared to Cardinals' pitchers in similar matchup...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% San Diego Padres

First five innings often favor the stronger starting pitching, but without knowing the starters, it's close. Based on my training data, Padr...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

St.Louis Cardinals

55
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

St.Louis Cardinals

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

St.Louis Cardinals

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

San Diego Padres

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

St.Louis Cardinals

53
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6

St.Louis Cardinals

52
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

St.Louis Cardinals

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 24970b853edb37f9…
Kickoff
Wed, Jun 17 · 18:15 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 2881,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-17T18:15:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Wed, 17 Jun 2026 18:15:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "San Diego Padres",
        "home": "St.Louis Cardinals"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-15T18:17:10+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro
  • GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini
    4 tool calls · 2 sources

    2 citations captured — unlock with Pro

  • Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →