Stefanos TsitsipasvsJiri Lehecka
JLAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 3.5 2/10 models |
Stefanos Tsitsipas 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 3.5 |
62%
Stefanos Tsitsipas |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 3.5 Both players are aggressive baseline competitors who break serve occasionally and tend to push matches to multiple sets rather than surrende...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Stefanos Tsitsipas Tsitsipas holds a significant edge in hard-court experience and has consistently performed well at the US Open, where his aggressive baselin... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
54%
over 3.5 |
67%
Stefanos Tsitsipas |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
over 3.5 Training data shows Tsitsipas often drops sets early before prevailing in five-set matches. Lehecka possesses a big serve that can extend se...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
67%
Stefanos Tsitsipas Tsitsipas holds a clear edge in hard-court results and overall ranking over Lehecka based on training data through 2025-09. Lehecka has show... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Over 3.5 |
65%
Stefanos Tsitsipas |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
Over 3.5 Based on training data through early 2024, Jiri Lehecka possesses a strong serve and forehand that make him capable of taking sets from top...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Stefanos Tsitsipas Based on training data through early 2024, Stefanos Tsitsipas has a more established career and a higher ranking. He previously defeated Jir... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
over |
65%
Stefanos Tsitsipas |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Given Tsitsipas's likely edge and Lehecka's potential to compete, this match is expected to go to at least three sets. Lehecka is capable of...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Stefanos Tsitsipas Based on training data up to 2025, Stefanos Tsitsipas has a more established record and higher peak performance on hard courts compared to J... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
over 3.5 |
55%
Stefanos Tsitsipas |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 3.5 Both players possess strong serves and are capable of winning tiebreaks, making straight-set wins unlikely. Lehecka's aggressive baseline st...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Stefanos Tsitsipas Based on training data through 2025-09, Tsitsipas has a higher ranking and more experience on hard courts, particularly at the US Open. Lehe... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusover 3.5 2/10
Both players are aggressive baseline competitors who break serve occasionally and tend to push matches to multiple sets rather than surrende...
Training data shows Tsitsipas often drops sets early before prevailing in five-set matches. Lehecka possesses a big serve that can extend se...
Based on training data through early 2024, Jiri Lehecka possesses a strong serve and forehand that make him capable of taking sets from top...
Given Tsitsipas's likely edge and Lehecka's potential to compete, this match is expected to go to at least three sets. Lehecka is capable of...
Both players possess strong serves and are capable of winning tiebreaks, making straight-set wins unlikely. Lehecka's aggressive baseline st...
Match winner
ConsensusStefanos Tsitsipas 5/5
Tsitsipas holds a significant edge in hard-court experience and has consistently performed well at the US Open, where his aggressive baselin...
Tsitsipas holds a clear edge in hard-court results and overall ranking over Lehecka based on training data through 2025-09. Lehecka has show...
Based on training data through early 2024, Stefanos Tsitsipas has a more established career and a higher ranking. He previously defeated Jir...
Based on training data up to 2025, Stefanos Tsitsipas has a more established record and higher peak performance on hard courts compared to J...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Tsitsipas has a higher ranking and more experience on hard courts, particularly at the US Open. Lehe...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Claude Haiku 4.5
Stefanos Tsitsipas
DeepSeek V3
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
0b0ab61c73cec5a3…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Sep 4 · 21:15 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35684,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-04T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 04 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Jiri Lehecka",
"home": "Stefanos Tsitsipas"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.