Stefano TravagliavsHarry Wendelken
HWYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Stefano Travaglia 5/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Stefano Travaglia |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Stefano Travaglia Travaglia is an established ATP player with multiple tour-level wins and consistent hard-court experience, whereas Wendelken is a lower-rank...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 US Open first/early rounds on hard court often produce extended rallies, particularly if both players have solid baseline games. Travaglia i... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
Stefano Travaglia |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Stefano Travaglia Travaglia has far more professional experience and a stronger hard-court record than the young qualifier Wendelken. Training data through 20...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Best-of-5 format at US Open favors longer matches when the favorite is not dominant. Wendelken's serve could force sets into tiebreaks. Trai... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Stefano Travaglia |
60%
Under 4.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Stefano Travaglia Stefano Travaglia is a more experienced and higher-ranked professional, even though his primary surface preference is clay. His overall prof...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 4.5 Sets Given Stefano Travaglia's expected superiority, he should be able to close out the match in four sets or fewer, preventing it from reaching... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Stefano Travaglia |
60%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Stefano Travaglia Stefano Travaglia is a more established player with a higher career-high ranking and more experience on the ATP tour. While Harry Wendelken...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.5 While Travaglia is favored, Wendelken is capable of pushing a set, especially given the Grand Slam environment where players can raise their...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Stefano Travaglia |
50%
over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Stefano Travaglia Training data through early 2025 indicates Stefano Travaglia is a seasoned challenger-level player with a stronger serve and more consistent...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
50%
over 3.5 With Travaglia favored but not dominant, and Wendelken capable of taking a set on his best day, a four or five-set match is plausible. Both... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusStefano Travaglia 5/5
Travaglia is an established ATP player with multiple tour-level wins and consistent hard-court experience, whereas Wendelken is a lower-rank...
Travaglia has far more professional experience and a stronger hard-court record than the young qualifier Wendelken. Training data through 20...
Stefano Travaglia is a more experienced and higher-ranked professional, even though his primary surface preference is clay. His overall prof...
Stefano Travaglia is a more established player with a higher career-high ranking and more experience on the ATP tour. While Harry Wendelken...
Training data through early 2025 indicates Stefano Travaglia is a seasoned challenger-level player with a stronger serve and more consistent...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
US Open first/early rounds on hard court often produce extended rallies, particularly if both players have solid baseline games. Travaglia i...
Best-of-5 format at US Open favors longer matches when the favorite is not dominant. Wendelken's serve could force sets into tiebreaks. Trai...
Given Stefano Travaglia's expected superiority, he should be able to close out the match in four sets or fewer, preventing it from reaching...
While Travaglia is favored, Wendelken is capable of pushing a set, especially given the Grand Slam environment where players can raise their...
With Travaglia favored but not dominant, and Wendelken capable of taking a set on his best day, a four or five-set match is plausible. Both...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Stefano Travaglia
Grok 4 Fast
Stefano Travaglia
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Stefano Travaglia
DeepSeek V3
Stefano Travaglia
Claude Haiku 4.5
Stefano Travaglia
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
dc79ee1ac7e75a3b…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 18:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30782,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T18:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Harry Wendelken",
"home": "Stefano Travaglia"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.