Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Major League Baseball · Busch Stadium
Upcoming · in 88h 19m
SL

St. Louis CardinalsvsColorado Rockies

Colorado Rockies logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
St. Louis Cardinals 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% St. Louis Cardinals

The Cardinals play at home in Busch Stadium, a factor worth ~3% in baseball. Colorado is in worse form (2-3 over last 5 vs St. Louis 1-2), a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 68% St. Louis Cardinals

Cardinals are the stronger, rested home side and Busch Stadium typically suppresses runs vs Coors-style road offense; the Rockies' offense p...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% St. Louis Cardinals

The St. Louis Cardinals have a strong home advantage at Busch Stadium, with a home win rate of approximately 60% in the 2026 season. The Col...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 62% St. Louis Cardinals

Training data through 2025 shows the Cardinals as the stronger overall roster with home-field advantage at Busch Stadium. Rockies have consi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% St. Louis Cardinals

St. Louis generally holds a stronger historical standing in MLB and will benefit from playing at Busch Stadium. Colorado typically struggles...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Colorado Rockies

The Colorado Rockies have had slightly better recent form than the St. Louis Cardinals, winning 2 of their last 5 games compared to the Card...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% St. Louis Cardinals

Based on training data through 2025-09, the Cardinals have a stronger roster and better home performance at Busch Stadium. The Rockies' road...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Over 8.5

Colorado at altitude plays a minor role, but both teams show decent run-scoring capacity in recent form (Cardinals 21 in 3, Rockies 25 in 5)...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% under

Given Busch's neutral-to-pitcher-friendly run environment, light winds on forecast, and the Rockies' known road/Coors split (offense drops s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over

Both teams have shown tendencies towards high-scoring games in the 2026 season. The Rockies have an average of 5.2 runs scored per game, whi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% over

Training data through 2025 indicates Busch Stadium plays neutral to slightly hitter-friendly in August. Rockies games trend toward higher to...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% under_8.5

Busch Stadium is a relatively neutral park, not as prone to high-scoring games as Coors Field. The Rockies' offense historically performs si...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% over

Given the offensive output in the provided recent form for both teams (Rockies scored 25 in 5 games, Cardinals scored 21 in 3 games), and co...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 75% Over 2.5

Even with the Cardinals' pitcher-friendly park, MLB scoring averages around 4.5 runs per team, and both bullpens are suspect. The total line...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
St. Louis Cardinals -1.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% St. Louis Cardinals -1.5

Home-field advantage, better recent form, and superior rest days all point to a modest Cardinals lean. A -1.5 spread reflects a ~55% win pro...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 56% St. Louis Cardinals -1.5

A -1.5 run line for the Cardinals is reasonable given home advantage, park effect and the Rockies' poor road form away from Coors; if the Ca...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 50% St. Louis Cardinals

The spread of -1.5 indicates that the Cardinals are favored to win by at least two runs. Given their home advantage and the Rockies' struggl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% St. Louis Cardinals

Training data through 2025 shows Cardinals covering spreads more reliably at home against sub-.500 road teams like the Rockies. Home rest ad...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% home_ -1.5

The St. Louis Cardinals, playing at home, are historically stronger contenders than the Colorado Rockies, particularly when facing them outs...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Colorado Rockies

While the Cardinals are the home team, the Rockies' recent performance, though not overwhelmingly dominant, has been slightly more consisten...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 40% St. Louis Cardinals -1.5

The Cardinals are favored but winning by 2+ runs is not certain, as the Rockies have some offensive pop. Given the low total, a tight game i...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
St. Louis Cardinals 6/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% St. Louis Cardinals

Early-innings outcomes are often driven by starting pitcher performance and home-plate presence. The Cardinals' recent run-scoring efficienc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% St. Louis Cardinals

Projecting the first five innings favors the Cardinals because of home advantage and the expected drop in Rockies run production away from C...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% St. Louis Cardinals

The Cardinals have demonstrated strong early-game performance at home, often taking the lead in the first five innings. The Rockies have bee...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% St. Louis Cardinals

Training data through 2025 highlights Cardinals starters performing better in early innings at home. Rockies lineups struggle early on the r...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 50% St. Louis Cardinals

Inferred starting pitching strength, coupled with home-field advantage, favors the Cardinals in the early innings. The Rockies typically str...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 50% St. Louis Cardinals

The starting pitching matchup is the primary factor; the Cardinals are likely to have a better starter. The Rockies' road disadvantage often...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First five innings o4.5

Consensus
over 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 56% over

The first five innings are heavily influenced by starting pitching. Assuming the starting pitchers for both teams are relatively evenly matc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

St. Louis Cardinals

68
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

St. Louis Cardinals

62
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

St. Louis Cardinals

60
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

St. Louis Cardinals

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

St. Louis Cardinals

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Colorado Rockies

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

St. Louis Cardinals

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1032–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 7b358ef78a3ac8ec…
Kickoff
Sat, Aug 8 · 00:15 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 21159,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Busch Stadium",
        "league": "Major League Baseball",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-08T00:15:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sat, 08 Aug 2026 00:15:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Colorado Rockies",
        "home": "St. Louis Cardinals"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LWLWL",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 25,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 27
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "LLW",
            "record": "1W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 21,
            "matches": 3,
            "conceded": 16
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 29,
            "home": 56
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →