Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB Major League Baseball · Busch Stadium
Upcoming · in 82h 12m
SL

St. Louis CardinalsvsCincinnati Reds

Cincinnati Reds logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Under 8.5

Both teams are averaging modest run production: Cardinals 7.0 RPG (21 in 3 matches), Reds 4.0 RPG (20 in 5 matches). Without knowledge of to...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% under

Both probable starters profile as strikeout/ground-ball inclined right-handers (Greene with high-K upside, Leahy a mid-rotation innings eate...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over

Both teams have shown a tendency to score multiple runs in recent games, and the ballpark dimensions at Busch Stadium can favor hitters. Thi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Busch Stadium plays neutral to slight hitter-friendly in summer with typical July weather. Both teams average over 4.5 runs per game in rece...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Over

I do not have live access to real-time data or web search tools. My predictions are based solely on the provided brief, my training data (th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over

Both teams have shown an ability to score runs, and their recent games have featured high totals. The ballpark in St. Louis generally favors...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Over 8.5

Both teams have shown ability to score, and weak bullpens could lead to late runs. Historical trend at Busch favors slightly higher totals i...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

Spread

Consensus
St. Louis Cardinals -1.5 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% St. Louis Cardinals -1.5

The Cardinals' home-field edge and rest advantage support a slight favorite position, but the marginal recent form and lack of pitcher intel...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 52% Cincinnati Reds +1.5

The Cardinals are the small favorites to win, but the Reds (away) have a strong starter in Hunter Greene who can keep the game close through...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% St. Louis Cardinals

Given the Cardinals' home advantage and recent form, they are likely to win by at least 2 runs. The Reds have been competitive but may strug...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% home_ -1.5

Home team expected to win by 1-2 runs on average given venue and rest edge. Training data through 2025-09 shows Cardinals covering the run l...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 51% St. Louis Cardinals -1.5

I do not have live access to real-time data or web search tools. My predictions are based solely on the provided brief, my training data (th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Cincinnati Reds

Given the slight edge in head-to-head prediction and the offensive potential, the Reds are favored to cover a small spread. While the Cardin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 38% St. Louis Cardinals -1.5

Cardinals are favored but covering a 1.5-run spread requires a comfortable win, which is uncertain given the Reds' offensive potential.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

First 5 innings

Consensus
Cincinnati Reds 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Under 4.5

Early-inning runs are highly pitcher-dependent. Both teams' recent run production is low (Cardinals 7.0 per game, Reds 4.0 per game), sugges...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 51% Cincinnati Reds

First-five outcomes tilt slightly to the Reds because Hunter Greene has shown the ability to miss bats early and give his team a low-run env...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% St. Louis Cardinals

The Cardinals' starting pitcher has been effective in the early innings, and their offense tends to perform well at home. This suggests they...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% St. Louis Cardinals

Starting pitcher matchup and home advantage typically decide the first five. Training data through 2025-09 shows Cardinals leading after fiv...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% St. Louis Cardinals

I do not have live access to real-time data or web search tools. My predictions are based solely on the provided brief, my training data (th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Cincinnati Reds

The Reds have shown a tendency to start games strong when their offense is clicking. With a favorable pitching matchup against an inconsiste...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 30% Cincinnati Reds

First five innings often depend on starting pitchers. Without specific matchup data, slight lean to Cardinals but high uncertainty given lac...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

Match winner

Consensus
St. Louis Cardinals 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% St. Louis Cardinals

The Cardinals have a significant rest advantage (42 days vs 16), though both teams are in poor form. Cincinnati's recent record is worse (2–...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% St. Louis Cardinals

Probable-starter reporting and recent form favor the Cardinals at home: Kyle Leahy has been a reasonably steady mid-rotation righty and Busc...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% St. Louis Cardinals

The St. Louis Cardinals have a strong home advantage at Busch Stadium, and their recent form suggests a slight edge over the Cincinnati Reds...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% St. Louis Cardinals

Cardinals hold home-field advantage at Busch Stadium and enter with better recent run production than the Reds. Training data through 2025-0...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% St. Louis Cardinals

I do not have live access to real-time data or web search tools. My predictions are based solely on the provided brief, my training data (th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Cincinnati Reds

While the Cardinals have a slight edge at home, the Reds' recent form, though poor, has been against tougher competition. The pitching match...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% St. Louis Cardinals

Cardinals have home-field advantage at Busch Stadium and a deeper pitching staff. Reds are inconsistent on the road and lack a clear ace.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
1 source cited

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

St. Louis Cardinals

58
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

St. Louis Cardinals

58
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

St. Louis Cardinals

58
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

St. Louis Cardinals

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

St. Louis Cardinals

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Cincinnati Reds

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

St. Louis Cardinals

54

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1052–798 · 57%
-601.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 688–582 · 54%
-361.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1124–1107 · 50%
-921.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 738–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1025–1049 · 49%
-740.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 873–924 · 49%
-722.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1013–1089 · 48%
-926.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 9e5b7fad19be0ae6…
Kickoff
Sat, Jul 25 · 00:15 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 15226,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": "Busch Stadium",
        "league": "Major League Baseball",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-25T00:15:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sat, 25 Jul 2026 00:15:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Cincinnati Reds",
        "home": "St. Louis Cardinals"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
        "Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
        "Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
        "Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
        "Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "WLWLL",
            "record": "2W-0D-3L",
            "scored": 20,
            "matches": 5,
            "conceded": 22
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "LLW",
            "record": "1W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 21,
            "matches": 3,
            "conceded": 16
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 16,
            "home": 42
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →