SSV Jeddelohvs1. FC Heidenheim
SSV Jeddeloh 5–2 1. FC Heidenheim
All 8 AIs backed 1. FC Heidenheim — reality had other ideas.
- AI lean
- 1. FC Heidenheim 8/8
- Correct calls
- 0/8
- Final
- 5–2
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
32 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
1. FC Heidenheim 8/8 models |
1. FC Heidenheim 8/8 models |
no 8/8 models |
1. FC Heidenheim 8/8 models |
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 6/8 models |
0-3 8/8 models |
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim 8/8 models |
over 8/8 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
85%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
82%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
71%
no
L
|
74%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
65%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5
L
|
22%
0-3
L
|
61%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
68%
over
W
|
|
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
85%
1. FC Heidenheim The professional side is expected to dominate and avoid a draw against lower-league opposition. Jeddeloh lacks the attacking tools to hold H...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim competes at Bundesliga level while Jeddeloh is a Regionalliga side; the gulf in quality and resources points to a comfortable awa...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
71%
no Jeddeloh are unlikely to score against a structured Bundesliga defense. Heidenheim's clean-sheet record in cup games against weaker sides is...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
74%
1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim should cover a -1 handicap given the expected margin of victory. Jeddeloh's defensive frailties make a multi-goal defeat probable...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
65%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 A 2-0 or 3-0 type result is realistic for Heidenheim, covering -1.5. The quality gap favors a clear win rather than a narrow one. Training d...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
22%
0-3 A 0-3 or 0-4 scoreline aligns with the expected dominance and Jeddeloh's inability to score. Heidenheim's efficient finishing against weaker...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
61%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim are likely to lead at half-time and maintain control for the full-time win. Early goals from set pieces or counters are probable....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
over Heidenheim's attacking quality should produce multiple goals against a leaky lower-league defense. Jeddeloh's form shows high concession rat... |
|||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
85%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
82%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
71%
no
L
|
74%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
65%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5
L
|
22%
0-3
L
|
61%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
68%
over
W
|
|
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
85%
1. FC Heidenheim The professional side is expected to dominate and avoid a draw against lower-league opposition. Jeddeloh lacks the attacking tools to hold H...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim competes at Bundesliga level while Jeddeloh is a Regionalliga side; the gulf in quality and resources points to a comfortable awa...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
71%
no Jeddeloh are unlikely to score against a structured Bundesliga defense. Heidenheim's clean-sheet record in cup games against weaker sides is...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
74%
1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim should cover a -1 handicap given the expected margin of victory. Jeddeloh's defensive frailties make a multi-goal defeat probable...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
65%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 A 2-0 or 3-0 type result is realistic for Heidenheim, covering -1.5. The quality gap favors a clear win rather than a narrow one. Training d...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
22%
0-3 A 0-3 or 0-4 scoreline aligns with the expected dominance and Jeddeloh's inability to score. Heidenheim's efficient finishing against weaker...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
61%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim are likely to lead at half-time and maintain control for the full-time win. Early goals from set pieces or counters are probable....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
over Heidenheim's attacking quality should produce multiple goals against a leaky lower-league defense. Jeddeloh's form shows high concession rat... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
90%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
80%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
60%
no
L
|
80%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
75%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5
L
|
18%
0-3
L
|
71%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
70%
over
W
|
|
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
90%
1. FC Heidenheim Given the substantial quality difference, Heidenheim is strongly favored to win outright. The draw no bet market further emphasizes Heidenhe...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
80%
1. FC Heidenheim Based on my training data up to my last update, 1. FC Heidenheim, a higher-tier professional club, is significantly stronger than SSV Jeddel...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
no While Heidenheim has conceded goals recently, it was likely against stronger opposition in their own league. Jeddeloh's offense (1.2 goals/g...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
80%
1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim is expected to win this match comfortably by a margin of at least two goals due to their superior quality and typical cup dominan...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
75%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 Assuming an Asian Handicap line of -1.5 for Heidenheim, they are very likely to cover this by winning by two or more goals. This aligns with...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
0-3 Considering Heidenheim's attacking prowess and Jeddeloh's defensive vulnerabilities, a 0-3 scoreline is a strong possibility. While Jeddeloh...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
71%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim is expected to assert their superiority from the start, leading at halftime and maintaining their lead to secure the victory. A d...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
over Heidenheim averages 2.4 goals scored in their last five matches, and Jeddeloh concedes 2.8 goals on average. The attacking strength of the a... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
90%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
80%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
60%
no
L
|
80%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
75%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5
L
|
18%
0-3
L
|
71%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
70%
over
W
|
|
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
90%
1. FC Heidenheim Given the substantial quality difference, Heidenheim is strongly favored to win outright. The draw no bet market further emphasizes Heidenhe...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
80%
1. FC Heidenheim Based on my training data up to my last update, 1. FC Heidenheim, a higher-tier professional club, is significantly stronger than SSV Jeddel...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
no While Heidenheim has conceded goals recently, it was likely against stronger opposition in their own league. Jeddeloh's offense (1.2 goals/g...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
80%
1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim is expected to win this match comfortably by a margin of at least two goals due to their superior quality and typical cup dominan...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
75%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 Assuming an Asian Handicap line of -1.5 for Heidenheim, they are very likely to cover this by winning by two or more goals. This aligns with...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
0-3 Considering Heidenheim's attacking prowess and Jeddeloh's defensive vulnerabilities, a 0-3 scoreline is a strong possibility. While Jeddeloh...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
71%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim is expected to assert their superiority from the start, leading at halftime and maintaining their lead to secure the victory. A d...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
over Heidenheim averages 2.4 goals scored in their last five matches, and Jeddeloh concedes 2.8 goals on average. The attacking strength of the a... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
88%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
85%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
65%
no
L
|
75%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
60%
away_ -2.0 |
15%
0-3
L
|
70%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
70%
over
W
|
|
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
88%
1. FC Heidenheim Given the substantial gulf in class between a Bundesliga side and an Oberliga team, it's highly improbable that SSV Jeddeloh will secure a r...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
1. FC Heidenheim 1. FC Heidenheim, a professional club, is a heavy favorite against SSV Jeddeloh, an amateur side. Heidenheim plays in the Bundesliga, while...
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
65%
no SSV Jeddeloh's offensive output is very low (6 goals in 5 games), and they are unlikely to score against a professional Bundesliga defense....
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
75%
1. FC Heidenheim 1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win by at least two goals. Their professional status and attacking prowess should allow them to comfortably...
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
60%
away_ -2.0 Considering the immense difference in quality between a Bundesliga side and an Oberliga team, 1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win by a margi...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
0-3 1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win comfortably. A scoreline of 0-3 reflects their superior attacking quality against an amateur side while...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
70%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim Given the significant disparity in quality, it's highly probable that 1. FC Heidenheim will lead at halftime and extend their advantage in t...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
over While the quality difference suggests a large margin of victory for Heidenheim, Jeddeloh's poor defensive record (14 conceded in 5 games) co...
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
88%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
85%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
65%
no
L
|
75%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
60%
away_ -2.0 |
15%
0-3
L
|
70%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
70%
over
W
|
|
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
88%
1. FC Heidenheim Given the substantial gulf in class between a Bundesliga side and an Oberliga team, it's highly improbable that SSV Jeddeloh will secure a r...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
1. FC Heidenheim 1. FC Heidenheim, a professional club, is a heavy favorite against SSV Jeddeloh, an amateur side. Heidenheim plays in the Bundesliga, while...
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
65%
no SSV Jeddeloh's offensive output is very low (6 goals in 5 games), and they are unlikely to score against a professional Bundesliga defense....
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
75%
1. FC Heidenheim 1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win by at least two goals. Their professional status and attacking prowess should allow them to comfortably...
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
60%
away_ -2.0 Considering the immense difference in quality between a Bundesliga side and an Oberliga team, 1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win by a margi...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
0-3 1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win comfortably. A scoreline of 0-3 reflects their superior attacking quality against an amateur side while...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
70%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim Given the significant disparity in quality, it's highly probable that 1. FC Heidenheim will lead at halftime and extend their advantage in t...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
over While the quality difference suggests a large margin of victory for Heidenheim, Jeddeloh's poor defensive record (14 conceded in 5 games) co...
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
90%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
85%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
65%
no
L
|
75%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
70%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5
L
|
25%
0-3
L
|
60%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
70%
over
W
|
|
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
90%
1. FC Heidenheim With the draw removed, backing Heidenheim is even safer given the vast class gap. Jeddeloh's poor form and weaker squad make an upset improb...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim, a 2. Bundesliga side, faces fourth-tier Jeddeloh in the DFB Pokal. Class difference and superior squad depth make an away win hi...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
65%
no While Jeddeloh can get a consolation, Heidenheim's defensive quality should limit them. Jeddeloh's attack is weak, and they may fail to scor...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
75%
1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim should win by at least two goals given the gap in class. A -1 spread for the away team is coverable. Jeddeloh's defense is leaky,...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
70%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 A -1.5 handicap for Heidenheim reflects the expectation of a comfortable victory. They have the quality to score multiple goals, and Jeddelo...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
25%
0-3 Heidenheim's quality should lead to a multiple-goal victory, while Jeddeloh may struggle to score. 0-3 is a plausible clean sheet win, but o...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
60%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim should take control early and maintain the lead. Jeddeloh is unlikely to come from behind. The most probable outcome is away team...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
over Heidenheim's attack should overwhelm Jeddeloh's defense. Expect multiple goals from the favored side, and Jeddeloh may also score at home. B... |
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
90%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
85%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
65%
no
L
|
75%
1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
70%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5
L
|
25%
0-3
L
|
60%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim
L
|
70%
over
W
|
|
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
90%
1. FC Heidenheim With the draw removed, backing Heidenheim is even safer given the vast class gap. Jeddeloh's poor form and weaker squad make an upset improb...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim, a 2. Bundesliga side, faces fourth-tier Jeddeloh in the DFB Pokal. Class difference and superior squad depth make an away win hi...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
65%
no While Jeddeloh can get a consolation, Heidenheim's defensive quality should limit them. Jeddeloh's attack is weak, and they may fail to scor...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
75%
1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim should win by at least two goals given the gap in class. A -1 spread for the away team is coverable. Jeddeloh's defense is leaky,...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
70%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 A -1.5 handicap for Heidenheim reflects the expectation of a comfortable victory. They have the quality to score multiple goals, and Jeddelo...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
25%
0-3 Heidenheim's quality should lead to a multiple-goal victory, while Jeddeloh may struggle to score. 0-3 is a plausible clean sheet win, but o...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
60%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim should take control early and maintain the lead. Jeddeloh is unlikely to come from behind. The most probable outcome is away team...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
over Heidenheim's attack should overwhelm Jeddeloh's defense. Expect multiple goals from the favored side, and Jeddeloh may also score at home. B... |
|||||||||
Draw no bet
Consensus1. FC Heidenheim 8/8
The professional side is expected to dominate and avoid a draw against lower-league opposition. Jeddeloh lacks the attacking tools to hold H...
The professional side is expected to dominate and avoid a draw against lower-league opposition. Jeddeloh lacks the attacking tools to hold H...
Given the substantial quality difference, Heidenheim is strongly favored to win outright. The draw no bet market further emphasizes Heidenhe...
Given the substantial quality difference, Heidenheim is strongly favored to win outright. The draw no bet market further emphasizes Heidenhe...
Given the substantial gulf in class between a Bundesliga side and an Oberliga team, it's highly improbable that SSV Jeddeloh will secure a r...
Given the substantial gulf in class between a Bundesliga side and an Oberliga team, it's highly improbable that SSV Jeddeloh will secure a r...
With the draw removed, backing Heidenheim is even safer given the vast class gap. Jeddeloh's poor form and weaker squad make an upset improb...
With the draw removed, backing Heidenheim is even safer given the vast class gap. Jeddeloh's poor form and weaker squad make an upset improb...
Match winner
Consensus1. FC Heidenheim 8/8
Heidenheim competes at Bundesliga level while Jeddeloh is a Regionalliga side; the gulf in quality and resources points to a comfortable awa...
Heidenheim competes at Bundesliga level while Jeddeloh is a Regionalliga side; the gulf in quality and resources points to a comfortable awa...
Based on my training data up to my last update, 1. FC Heidenheim, a higher-tier professional club, is significantly stronger than SSV Jeddel...
Based on my training data up to my last update, 1. FC Heidenheim, a higher-tier professional club, is significantly stronger than SSV Jeddel...
1. FC Heidenheim, a professional club, is a heavy favorite against SSV Jeddeloh, an amateur side. Heidenheim plays in the Bundesliga, while...
1. FC Heidenheim, a professional club, is a heavy favorite against SSV Jeddeloh, an amateur side. Heidenheim plays in the Bundesliga, while...
Heidenheim, a 2. Bundesliga side, faces fourth-tier Jeddeloh in the DFB Pokal. Class difference and superior squad depth make an away win hi...
Heidenheim, a 2. Bundesliga side, faces fourth-tier Jeddeloh in the DFB Pokal. Class difference and superior squad depth make an away win hi...
Both teams to score
Consensusno 8/8
Jeddeloh are unlikely to score against a structured Bundesliga defense. Heidenheim's clean-sheet record in cup games against weaker sides is...
Jeddeloh are unlikely to score against a structured Bundesliga defense. Heidenheim's clean-sheet record in cup games against weaker sides is...
While Heidenheim has conceded goals recently, it was likely against stronger opposition in their own league. Jeddeloh's offense (1.2 goals/g...
While Heidenheim has conceded goals recently, it was likely against stronger opposition in their own league. Jeddeloh's offense (1.2 goals/g...
SSV Jeddeloh's offensive output is very low (6 goals in 5 games), and they are unlikely to score against a professional Bundesliga defense....
SSV Jeddeloh's offensive output is very low (6 goals in 5 games), and they are unlikely to score against a professional Bundesliga defense....
While Jeddeloh can get a consolation, Heidenheim's defensive quality should limit them. Jeddeloh's attack is weak, and they may fail to scor...
While Jeddeloh can get a consolation, Heidenheim's defensive quality should limit them. Jeddeloh's attack is weak, and they may fail to scor...
Spread
Consensus1. FC Heidenheim 8/8
Heidenheim should cover a -1 handicap given the expected margin of victory. Jeddeloh's defensive frailties make a multi-goal defeat probable...
Heidenheim should cover a -1 handicap given the expected margin of victory. Jeddeloh's defensive frailties make a multi-goal defeat probable...
Heidenheim is expected to win this match comfortably by a margin of at least two goals due to their superior quality and typical cup dominan...
Heidenheim is expected to win this match comfortably by a margin of at least two goals due to their superior quality and typical cup dominan...
1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win by at least two goals. Their professional status and attacking prowess should allow them to comfortably...
1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win by at least two goals. Their professional status and attacking prowess should allow them to comfortably...
Heidenheim should win by at least two goals given the gap in class. A -1 spread for the away team is coverable. Jeddeloh's defense is leaky,...
Heidenheim should win by at least two goals given the gap in class. A -1 spread for the away team is coverable. Jeddeloh's defense is leaky,...
Asian handicap
Consensus1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 6/8
A 2-0 or 3-0 type result is realistic for Heidenheim, covering -1.5. The quality gap favors a clear win rather than a narrow one. Training d...
A 2-0 or 3-0 type result is realistic for Heidenheim, covering -1.5. The quality gap favors a clear win rather than a narrow one. Training d...
Assuming an Asian Handicap line of -1.5 for Heidenheim, they are very likely to cover this by winning by two or more goals. This aligns with...
Assuming an Asian Handicap line of -1.5 for Heidenheim, they are very likely to cover this by winning by two or more goals. This aligns with...
Considering the immense difference in quality between a Bundesliga side and an Oberliga team, 1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win by a margi...
Considering the immense difference in quality between a Bundesliga side and an Oberliga team, 1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win by a margi...
A -1.5 handicap for Heidenheim reflects the expectation of a comfortable victory. They have the quality to score multiple goals, and Jeddelo...
A -1.5 handicap for Heidenheim reflects the expectation of a comfortable victory. They have the quality to score multiple goals, and Jeddelo...
Correct score
Consensus0-3 8/8
A 0-3 or 0-4 scoreline aligns with the expected dominance and Jeddeloh's inability to score. Heidenheim's efficient finishing against weaker...
A 0-3 or 0-4 scoreline aligns with the expected dominance and Jeddeloh's inability to score. Heidenheim's efficient finishing against weaker...
Considering Heidenheim's attacking prowess and Jeddeloh's defensive vulnerabilities, a 0-3 scoreline is a strong possibility. While Jeddeloh...
Considering Heidenheim's attacking prowess and Jeddeloh's defensive vulnerabilities, a 0-3 scoreline is a strong possibility. While Jeddeloh...
1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win comfortably. A scoreline of 0-3 reflects their superior attacking quality against an amateur side while...
1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win comfortably. A scoreline of 0-3 reflects their superior attacking quality against an amateur side while...
Heidenheim's quality should lead to a multiple-goal victory, while Jeddeloh may struggle to score. 0-3 is a plausible clean sheet win, but o...
Heidenheim's quality should lead to a multiple-goal victory, while Jeddeloh may struggle to score. 0-3 is a plausible clean sheet win, but o...
Half-time / Full-time
Consensus1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim 8/8
Heidenheim are likely to lead at half-time and maintain control for the full-time win. Early goals from set pieces or counters are probable....
Heidenheim are likely to lead at half-time and maintain control for the full-time win. Early goals from set pieces or counters are probable....
Heidenheim is expected to assert their superiority from the start, leading at halftime and maintaining their lead to secure the victory. A d...
Heidenheim is expected to assert their superiority from the start, leading at halftime and maintaining their lead to secure the victory. A d...
Given the significant disparity in quality, it's highly probable that 1. FC Heidenheim will lead at halftime and extend their advantage in t...
Given the significant disparity in quality, it's highly probable that 1. FC Heidenheim will lead at halftime and extend their advantage in t...
Heidenheim should take control early and maintain the lead. Jeddeloh is unlikely to come from behind. The most probable outcome is away team...
Heidenheim should take control early and maintain the lead. Jeddeloh is unlikely to come from behind. The most probable outcome is away team...
Over / Under
Consensusover 8/8
Heidenheim's attacking quality should produce multiple goals against a leaky lower-league defense. Jeddeloh's form shows high concession rat...
Heidenheim's attacking quality should produce multiple goals against a leaky lower-league defense. Jeddeloh's form shows high concession rat...
Heidenheim averages 2.4 goals scored in their last five matches, and Jeddeloh concedes 2.8 goals on average. The attacking strength of the a...
Heidenheim averages 2.4 goals scored in their last five matches, and Jeddeloh concedes 2.8 goals on average. The attacking strength of the a...
While the quality difference suggests a large margin of victory for Heidenheim, Jeddeloh's poor defensive record (14 conceded in 5 games) co...
While the quality difference suggests a large margin of victory for Heidenheim, Jeddeloh's poor defensive record (14 conceded in 5 games) co...
Heidenheim's attack should overwhelm Jeddeloh's defense. Expect multiple goals from the favored side, and Jeddeloh may also score at home. B...
Heidenheim's attack should overwhelm Jeddeloh's defense. Expect multiple goals from the favored side, and Jeddeloh may also score at home. B...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1. FC Heidenheim
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1. FC Heidenheim
DeepSeek V3
1. FC Heidenheim
DeepSeek V3
1. FC Heidenheim
Grok 4 Fast
1. FC Heidenheim
Grok 4 Fast
1. FC Heidenheim
Gemini 2.5 Flash
1. FC Heidenheim
Gemini 2.5 Flash
1. FC Heidenheim
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
fe2c259296a4df4b…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 23 · 13:00 GMT+0200
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 29949,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Marschweg-Stadion",
"league": "DFB Pokal",
"starts_at": "2026-08-23T11:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 23 Aug 2026 11:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "1. FC Heidenheim",
"home": "SSV Jeddeloh"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LLWWD",
"record": "2W-1D-2L",
"scored": 12,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 13
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LWLLL",
"record": "1W-0D-4L",
"scored": 6,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 14
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 4,
"home": 7
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.