SSV Jeddelohvs1. FC Heidenheim
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
1. FC Heidenheim 4/4 models |
1. FC Heidenheim 4/4 models |
over 4/4 models |
no 4/4 models |
1. FC Heidenheim 4/4 models |
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 3/4 models |
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim 4/4 models |
0-3 4/4 models |
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
82%
1. FC Heidenheim |
85%
1. FC Heidenheim |
68%
over |
71%
no |
74%
1. FC Heidenheim |
65%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 |
61%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim |
22%
0-3 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim competes at Bundesliga level while Jeddeloh is a Regionalliga side; the gulf in quality and resources points to a comfortable awa...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
85%
1. FC Heidenheim The professional side is expected to dominate and avoid a draw against lower-league opposition. Jeddeloh lacks the attacking tools to hold H...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
over Heidenheim's attacking quality should produce multiple goals against a leaky lower-league defense. Jeddeloh's form shows high concession rat...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
71%
no Jeddeloh are unlikely to score against a structured Bundesliga defense. Heidenheim's clean-sheet record in cup games against weaker sides is...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
74%
1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim should cover a -1 handicap given the expected margin of victory. Jeddeloh's defensive frailties make a multi-goal defeat probable...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
65%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 A 2-0 or 3-0 type result is realistic for Heidenheim, covering -1.5. The quality gap favors a clear win rather than a narrow one. Training d...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
61%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim are likely to lead at half-time and maintain control for the full-time win. Early goals from set pieces or counters are probable....
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
22%
0-3 A 0-3 or 0-4 scoreline aligns with the expected dominance and Jeddeloh's inability to score. Heidenheim's efficient finishing against weaker... |
|||||||||
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
80%
1. FC Heidenheim |
90%
1. FC Heidenheim |
70%
over |
60%
no |
80%
1. FC Heidenheim |
75%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 |
71%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim |
18%
0-3 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
80%
1. FC Heidenheim Based on my training data up to my last update, 1. FC Heidenheim, a higher-tier professional club, is significantly stronger than SSV Jeddel...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
90%
1. FC Heidenheim Given the substantial quality difference, Heidenheim is strongly favored to win outright. The draw no bet market further emphasizes Heidenhe...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
over Heidenheim averages 2.4 goals scored in their last five matches, and Jeddeloh concedes 2.8 goals on average. The attacking strength of the a...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
no While Heidenheim has conceded goals recently, it was likely against stronger opposition in their own league. Jeddeloh's offense (1.2 goals/g...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
80%
1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim is expected to win this match comfortably by a margin of at least two goals due to their superior quality and typical cup dominan...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
75%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 Assuming an Asian Handicap line of -1.5 for Heidenheim, they are very likely to cover this by winning by two or more goals. This aligns with...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
71%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim is expected to assert their superiority from the start, leading at halftime and maintaining their lead to secure the victory. A d...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
0-3 Considering Heidenheim's attacking prowess and Jeddeloh's defensive vulnerabilities, a 0-3 scoreline is a strong possibility. While Jeddeloh... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
85%
1. FC Heidenheim |
88%
1. FC Heidenheim |
70%
over |
65%
no |
75%
1. FC Heidenheim |
60%
away_ -2.0 |
70%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim |
15%
0-3 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
1. FC Heidenheim 1. FC Heidenheim, a professional club, is a heavy favorite against SSV Jeddeloh, an amateur side. Heidenheim plays in the Bundesliga, while...
3 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
88%
1. FC Heidenheim Given the substantial gulf in class between a Bundesliga side and an Oberliga team, it's highly improbable that SSV Jeddeloh will secure a r...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
over While the quality difference suggests a large margin of victory for Heidenheim, Jeddeloh's poor defensive record (14 conceded in 5 games) co...
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
65%
no SSV Jeddeloh's offensive output is very low (6 goals in 5 games), and they are unlikely to score against a professional Bundesliga defense....
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
75%
1. FC Heidenheim 1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win by at least two goals. Their professional status and attacking prowess should allow them to comfortably...
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
60%
away_ -2.0 Considering the immense difference in quality between a Bundesliga side and an Oberliga team, 1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win by a margi...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
70%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim Given the significant disparity in quality, it's highly probable that 1. FC Heidenheim will lead at halftime and extend their advantage in t...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
0-3 1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win comfortably. A scoreline of 0-3 reflects their superior attacking quality against an amateur side while...
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
85%
1. FC Heidenheim |
90%
1. FC Heidenheim |
70%
over |
65%
no |
75%
1. FC Heidenheim |
70%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 |
60%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim |
25%
0-3 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim, a 2. Bundesliga side, faces fourth-tier Jeddeloh in the DFB Pokal. Class difference and superior squad depth make an away win hi...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
90%
1. FC Heidenheim With the draw removed, backing Heidenheim is even safer given the vast class gap. Jeddeloh's poor form and weaker squad make an upset improb...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
over Heidenheim's attack should overwhelm Jeddeloh's defense. Expect multiple goals from the favored side, and Jeddeloh may also score at home. B...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
65%
no While Jeddeloh can get a consolation, Heidenheim's defensive quality should limit them. Jeddeloh's attack is weak, and they may fail to scor...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
75%
1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim should win by at least two goals given the gap in class. A -1 spread for the away team is coverable. Jeddeloh's defense is leaky,...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
70%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 A -1.5 handicap for Heidenheim reflects the expectation of a comfortable victory. They have the quality to score multiple goals, and Jeddelo...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
60%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim Heidenheim should take control early and maintain the lead. Jeddeloh is unlikely to come from behind. The most probable outcome is away team...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
25%
0-3 Heidenheim's quality should lead to a multiple-goal victory, while Jeddeloh may struggle to score. 0-3 is a plausible clean sheet win, but o... |
|||||||||
Match winner
Consensus1. FC Heidenheim 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
82%
1. FC Heidenheim
Heidenheim competes at Bundesliga level while Jeddeloh is a Regionalliga side; the gulf in quality and resources points to a comfortable awa...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80%
1. FC Heidenheim
Based on my training data up to my last update, 1. FC Heidenheim, a higher-tier professional club, is significantly stronger than SSV Jeddel...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
85%
1. FC Heidenheim
1. FC Heidenheim, a professional club, is a heavy favorite against SSV Jeddeloh, an amateur side. Heidenheim plays in the Bundesliga, while...
DeepSeek V3
85%
1. FC Heidenheim
Heidenheim, a 2. Bundesliga side, faces fourth-tier Jeddeloh in the DFB Pokal. Class difference and superior squad depth make an away win hi...
Draw no bet
Consensus1. FC Heidenheim 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
85%
1. FC Heidenheim
The professional side is expected to dominate and avoid a draw against lower-league opposition. Jeddeloh lacks the attacking tools to hold H...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
90%
1. FC Heidenheim
Given the substantial quality difference, Heidenheim is strongly favored to win outright. The draw no bet market further emphasizes Heidenhe...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
88%
1. FC Heidenheim
Given the substantial gulf in class between a Bundesliga side and an Oberliga team, it's highly improbable that SSV Jeddeloh will secure a r...
DeepSeek V3
90%
1. FC Heidenheim
With the draw removed, backing Heidenheim is even safer given the vast class gap. Jeddeloh's poor form and weaker squad make an upset improb...
Over / Under
Consensusover 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
68%
over
Heidenheim's attacking quality should produce multiple goals against a leaky lower-league defense. Jeddeloh's form shows high concession rat...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
70%
over
Heidenheim averages 2.4 goals scored in their last five matches, and Jeddeloh concedes 2.8 goals on average. The attacking strength of the a...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
70%
over
While the quality difference suggests a large margin of victory for Heidenheim, Jeddeloh's poor defensive record (14 conceded in 5 games) co...
DeepSeek V3
70%
over
Heidenheim's attack should overwhelm Jeddeloh's defense. Expect multiple goals from the favored side, and Jeddeloh may also score at home. B...
Both teams to score
Consensusno 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
71%
no
Jeddeloh are unlikely to score against a structured Bundesliga defense. Heidenheim's clean-sheet record in cup games against weaker sides is...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
60%
no
While Heidenheim has conceded goals recently, it was likely against stronger opposition in their own league. Jeddeloh's offense (1.2 goals/g...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
65%
no
SSV Jeddeloh's offensive output is very low (6 goals in 5 games), and they are unlikely to score against a professional Bundesliga defense....
DeepSeek V3
65%
no
While Jeddeloh can get a consolation, Heidenheim's defensive quality should limit them. Jeddeloh's attack is weak, and they may fail to scor...
Spread
Consensus1. FC Heidenheim 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
74%
1. FC Heidenheim
Heidenheim should cover a -1 handicap given the expected margin of victory. Jeddeloh's defensive frailties make a multi-goal defeat probable...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80%
1. FC Heidenheim
Heidenheim is expected to win this match comfortably by a margin of at least two goals due to their superior quality and typical cup dominan...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
75%
1. FC Heidenheim
1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win by at least two goals. Their professional status and attacking prowess should allow them to comfortably...
DeepSeek V3
75%
1. FC Heidenheim
Heidenheim should win by at least two goals given the gap in class. A -1 spread for the away team is coverable. Jeddeloh's defense is leaky,...
Asian handicap
Consensus1. FC Heidenheim -1.5 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
65%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5
A 2-0 or 3-0 type result is realistic for Heidenheim, covering -1.5. The quality gap favors a clear win rather than a narrow one. Training d...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
75%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5
Assuming an Asian Handicap line of -1.5 for Heidenheim, they are very likely to cover this by winning by two or more goals. This aligns with...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
60%
away_ -2.0
Considering the immense difference in quality between a Bundesliga side and an Oberliga team, 1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win by a margi...
DeepSeek V3
70%
1. FC Heidenheim -1.5
A -1.5 handicap for Heidenheim reflects the expectation of a comfortable victory. They have the quality to score multiple goals, and Jeddelo...
Half-time / Full-time
Consensus1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
61%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim
Heidenheim are likely to lead at half-time and maintain control for the full-time win. Early goals from set pieces or counters are probable....
Gemini 2.5 Flash
71%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim
Heidenheim is expected to assert their superiority from the start, leading at halftime and maintaining their lead to secure the victory. A d...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
70%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim
Given the significant disparity in quality, it's highly probable that 1. FC Heidenheim will lead at halftime and extend their advantage in t...
DeepSeek V3
60%
1. FC Heidenheim / 1. FC Heidenheim
Heidenheim should take control early and maintain the lead. Jeddeloh is unlikely to come from behind. The most probable outcome is away team...
Correct score
Consensus0-3 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
22%
0-3
A 0-3 or 0-4 scoreline aligns with the expected dominance and Jeddeloh's inability to score. Heidenheim's efficient finishing against weaker...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
18%
0-3
Considering Heidenheim's attacking prowess and Jeddeloh's defensive vulnerabilities, a 0-3 scoreline is a strong possibility. While Jeddeloh...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
15%
0-3
1. FC Heidenheim is expected to win comfortably. A scoreline of 0-3 reflects their superior attacking quality against an amateur side while...
DeepSeek V3
25%
0-3
Heidenheim's quality should lead to a multiple-goal victory, while Jeddeloh may struggle to score. 0-3 is a plausible clean sheet win, but o...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1. FC Heidenheim
DeepSeek V3
1. FC Heidenheim
Grok 4 Fast
1. FC Heidenheim
Gemini 2.5 Flash
1. FC Heidenheim
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Call the exact final score
Free account. Pick the exact final score, lock it before kickoff, beat the AI consensus across the WC and win a lifetime free plan.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
fe2c259296a4df4b…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 23 · 11:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 29949,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Marschweg-Stadion",
"league": "DFB Pokal",
"starts_at": "2026-08-23T11:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 23 Aug 2026 11:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "1. FC Heidenheim",
"home": "SSV Jeddeloh"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LLWWD",
"record": "2W-1D-2L",
"scored": 12,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 13
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LWLLL",
"record": "1W-0D-4L",
"scored": 6,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 14
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 4,
"home": 7
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.