Sorana CirsteavsJasmine Paolini
JPAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 2/10 models |
Jasmine Paolini 3/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
55%
Over 2.5 |
68%
Jasmine Paolini |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Both players are competent baseline grinders with moderate serve speeds; neither dominates serves enough to steamroll. Cirstea's consistency...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Jasmine Paolini Paolini has been a top-10 player in 2024–2025 with stronger hard-court performance and more consistent Grand Slam results, while Cirstea, th... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
51%
over |
58%
Jasmine Paolini |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Hard-court rallies and break opportunities typically inflate game counts in this matchup profile. Training data through 2024 shows their pri...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Jasmine Paolini Paolini holds the edge in recent hard-court results and movement against Cirstea's style. Training data through 2024 shows Paolini's superio... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Over 2.5 sets |
58%
Sorana Cirstea |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 sets This match is likely to be competitive, with both players possessing qualities to challenge each other. Cirstea's power can lead to inconsis...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Sorana Cirstea Sorana Cirstea's powerful groundstrokes and aggressive play style are typically effective on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Op... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
2.5 |
55%
Sorana Cirstea |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.5 Given the closely matched potential of both players, it is likely this match will go to three sets. While one player might have an edge, the...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Sorana Cirstea Sorana Cirstea has a more aggressive game style and significant experience on hard courts, which should give her an edge. Jasmine Paolini is... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
under_2.5 |
62%
Jasmine Paolini |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under_2.5 In women's Grand Slam matches, straight-set wins are common. Paolini is expected to win relatively comfortably given her edge over Cirstea,...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Jasmine Paolini Based on training data through early 2025, Paolini has been consistently top-20 with strong hard-court results, while Cirstea is more incons... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Both players are competent baseline grinders with moderate serve speeds; neither dominates serves enough to steamroll. Cirstea's consistency...
Hard-court rallies and break opportunities typically inflate game counts in this matchup profile. Training data through 2024 shows their pri...
This match is likely to be competitive, with both players possessing qualities to challenge each other. Cirstea's power can lead to inconsis...
Given the closely matched potential of both players, it is likely this match will go to three sets. While one player might have an edge, the...
In women's Grand Slam matches, straight-set wins are common. Paolini is expected to win relatively comfortably given her edge over Cirstea,...
Match winner
ConsensusJasmine Paolini 3/5
Paolini has been a top-10 player in 2024–2025 with stronger hard-court performance and more consistent Grand Slam results, while Cirstea, th...
Paolini holds the edge in recent hard-court results and movement against Cirstea's style. Training data through 2024 shows Paolini's superio...
Sorana Cirstea's powerful groundstrokes and aggressive play style are typically effective on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Op...
Sorana Cirstea has a more aggressive game style and significant experience on hard courts, which should give her an edge. Jasmine Paolini is...
Based on training data through early 2025, Paolini has been consistently top-20 with strong hard-court results, while Cirstea is more incons...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Jasmine Paolini
DeepSeek V3
Jasmine Paolini
Grok 4 Fast
Jasmine Paolini
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Sorana Cirstea
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Sorana Cirstea
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
48a419cf661fb6ec…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Sep 4 · 15:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35661,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-04T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 04 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Jasmine Paolini",
"home": "Sorana Cirstea"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.