Shintaro MochizukivsJakub Mensik
JMAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Jakub Mensik 5/5 models |
Over 3.5 Sets 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Jakub Mensik |
56%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Jakub Mensik Mensik, a rising Czech talent born in 2005, has demonstrated stronger hard-court performance and higher ATP ranking momentum through 2025–20...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
56%
Over 2.5 US Open men's singles in early rounds often feature competitive sets as both players are seeded or close in ranking. Mensik's aggressive bas... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
78%
Jakub Mensik |
72%
under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Jakub Mensik Mensik holds a clear ranking and recent form edge over Mochizuki on hard courts. Training data through 2025 shows Mensik consistently beatin...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
72%
under 3.5 Mensik's superior serve and return game point toward a straight-sets or four-set win at most. Mochizuki has shown limited ability to push to... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
62%
Jakub Mensik |
55%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Jakub Mensik Based on my training data up to my knowledge cutoff, Jakub Mensik generally possesses a more powerful game suited for hard courts, featuring...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 3.5 Sets Given that this is a best-of-5 match at the US Open, and both players are young, rising talents, a straight-sets victory for either is not h... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Jakub Mensik |
58%
Jakub Mensik |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Jakub Mensik Jakub Mensik is the higher-ranked player and has shown more consistent recent form on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open. Shi...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Jakub Mensik While Mensik is favored, Mochizuki is capable of pushing sets, especially in a Grand Slam environment. Mensik's recent matches suggest he ca...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
72%
Jakub Mensik |
55%
over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Jakub Mensik Based on training data through 2025-09, Jakub Mensik has shown stronger hard-court form and a more powerful serve, which is crucial on the U...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 3.5 While Mensik is the favorite, Mochizuki's defensive skills and ability to extend rallies could force tiebreakers and longer sets, pushing th... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusJakub Mensik 5/5
Mensik, a rising Czech talent born in 2005, has demonstrated stronger hard-court performance and higher ATP ranking momentum through 2025–20...
Mensik holds a clear ranking and recent form edge over Mochizuki on hard courts. Training data through 2025 shows Mensik consistently beatin...
Based on my training data up to my knowledge cutoff, Jakub Mensik generally possesses a more powerful game suited for hard courts, featuring...
Jakub Mensik is the higher-ranked player and has shown more consistent recent form on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open. Shi...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Jakub Mensik has shown stronger hard-court form and a more powerful serve, which is crucial on the U...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 3.5 Sets 1/10
US Open men's singles in early rounds often feature competitive sets as both players are seeded or close in ranking. Mensik's aggressive bas...
Mensik's superior serve and return game point toward a straight-sets or four-set win at most. Mochizuki has shown limited ability to push to...
Given that this is a best-of-5 match at the US Open, and both players are young, rising talents, a straight-sets victory for either is not h...
While Mensik is favored, Mochizuki is capable of pushing sets, especially in a Grand Slam environment. Mensik's recent matches suggest he ca...
While Mensik is the favorite, Mochizuki's defensive skills and ability to extend rallies could force tiebreakers and longer sets, pushing th...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Jakub Mensik
DeepSeek V3
Jakub Mensik
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Jakub Mensik
Claude Haiku 4.5
Jakub Mensik
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Jakub Mensik
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
ae78ba7a8c49f5bb…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 23:25 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 33696,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Jakub Mensik",
"home": "Shintaro Mochizuki"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.