Sebastian GorznyvsDaniil Medvedev
DMAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Daniil Medvedev 5/5 models |
under 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
72%
Daniil Medvedev |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Daniil Medvedev Medvedev is a former US Open finalist (2019, 2021) and multiple-time finalist at hard-court Slams with exceptional serve and baseline stabil...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Medvedev tends to grind through sets but rarely drops 3+ on hard courts against lower-ranked opponents. Gorzny, as a qualifier, will likely... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
92%
Daniil Medvedev |
78%
under_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
92%
Daniil Medvedev Medvedev is a multiple-time Grand Slam finalist with elite hard-court results while Gorzny is a low-ranked qualifier. Training data through...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
78%
under_3.5 Best-of-five US Open matchups between top-10 players and qualifiers end in straight or four sets more than 75 percent of the time. Medvedev'... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
95%
Daniil Medvedev |
85%
Under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
95%
Daniil Medvedev Based on my training data up to 2025, Daniil Medvedev is a Grand Slam champion and a top-tier player, especially strong on hard courts like...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
85%
Under 3.5 Given the significant difference in skill level and experience, Daniil Medvedev is highly likely to win this best-of-five match in straight... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
85%
Daniil Medvedev |
70%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Daniil Medvedev Daniil Medvedev is a highly experienced and top-ranked player with multiple Grand Slam titles, including a US Open championship. Sebastian G...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
under Given Medvedev's dominance and Gorzny's likely inability to match his level, this match is expected to be one-sided. Medvedev is capable of... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
90%
Daniil Medvedev |
60%
over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
90%
Daniil Medvedev Training data through 2025-09. Medvedev is a top-tier hard-court player with multiple deep Slam runs, while Gorzny is a qualifier ranked out...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over 3.5 While Medvedev is a strong favorite, early-round matches at Slams can be competitive, and Gorzny has nothing to lose. Training data suggests... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusDaniil Medvedev 5/5
Medvedev is a former US Open finalist (2019, 2021) and multiple-time finalist at hard-court Slams with exceptional serve and baseline stabil...
Medvedev is a multiple-time Grand Slam finalist with elite hard-court results while Gorzny is a low-ranked qualifier. Training data through...
Based on my training data up to 2025, Daniil Medvedev is a Grand Slam champion and a top-tier player, especially strong on hard courts like...
Daniil Medvedev is a highly experienced and top-ranked player with multiple Grand Slam titles, including a US Open championship. Sebastian G...
Training data through 2025-09. Medvedev is a top-tier hard-court player with multiple deep Slam runs, while Gorzny is a qualifier ranked out...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2/10
Medvedev tends to grind through sets but rarely drops 3+ on hard courts against lower-ranked opponents. Gorzny, as a qualifier, will likely...
Best-of-five US Open matchups between top-10 players and qualifiers end in straight or four sets more than 75 percent of the time. Medvedev'...
Given the significant difference in skill level and experience, Daniil Medvedev is highly likely to win this best-of-five match in straight...
Given Medvedev's dominance and Gorzny's likely inability to match his level, this match is expected to be one-sided. Medvedev is capable of...
While Medvedev is a strong favorite, early-round matches at Slams can be competitive, and Gorzny has nothing to lose. Training data suggests...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Daniil Medvedev
Grok 4 Fast
Daniil Medvedev
DeepSeek V3
Daniil Medvedev
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Daniil Medvedev
Claude Haiku 4.5
Daniil Medvedev
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
550189233327119a…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 2 · 15:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35137,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-02T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 02 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Daniil Medvedev",
"home": "Sebastian Gorzny"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.