Seattle MarinersvsMinnesota Twins
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Minnesota Twins 4/6 models |
over 4/6 models |
Minnesota Twins 3/6 models |
Minnesota Twins 3/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Minnesota Twins |
56%
over |
58%
Minnesota Twins |
54%
over_4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Minnesota Twins Minnesota enters with superior recent form (4W-1L vs Seattle's 2W-3L over the last 5 matches) and a +12 run differential advantage. Seattle'...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
56%
over Minnesota's recent scoring pace (28 runs over 5 games; 5.6 per game) and Seattle's leaky defense (10 runs conceded in 5 games; 2 per game) s...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Minnesota Twins Minnesota's 4-1 form and offensive edge (28 runs in 5 games vs Seattle's 20) support a spread advantage. The away side has demonstrated cons...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
over_4.5 Minnesota's offensive pace and Seattle's defensive vulnerabilities suggest early scoring opportunities. First-inning scoring in modern MLB h... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
60%
over |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins have demonstrated strong recent form with four wins in their last five games, scoring 28 runs and conceding 16. In contr...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown the ability to score runs recently, with the Twins averaging 5.6 runs per game and the Mariners averaging 4 runs per g...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins' recent form, including a 4-1 record in their last five games, suggests they are likely to win by at least two runs agai...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Minnesota Twins The Minnesota Twins have been strong in the early innings, scoring an average of 3 runs in the first five innings over their last five games...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Seattle Mariners |
51%
over |
52%
Seattle Mariners |
51%
Seattle Mariners |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Seattle Mariners Mariners hold home advantage at T-Mobile Park while Twins recent form edge is offset by poor road splits in training data. Both clubs enter...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over August Seattle nights trend warm with moderate humidity increasing carry. Both offenses posted above-average run rates in recent windows per...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Seattle Mariners Seattle's home run-line record in training data edges above .500 against AL Central clubs. Twins recent wins came against weaker pitching so...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Seattle Mariners Starting pitcher matchup and early lineup order favor Mariners in first five frames per historical splits. Twins road offense struggles earl... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Minnesota Twins |
53%
Under 8.5 |
55%
Minnesota Twins +1.5 |
38%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Minnesota Twins Based on the provided recent form, the Minnesota Twins (WWWWL) show stronger momentum compared to the Seattle Mariners (LLWWL). Although the...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Under 8.5 T-Mobile Park is generally known as a pitcher-friendly ballpark, which often suppresses total runs. The Mariners' recent form shows a tenden...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Minnesota Twins +1.5 Given the Minnesota Twins' superior recent form, picking them to cover the +1.5 run line feels appropriate. This implies they are likely to...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
38%
Minnesota Twins The First Five Innings outcome heavily relies on starting pitching and early lineup performance. Assuming competitive starting pitchers with... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Minnesota Twins |
52%
over |
53%
Minnesota Twins |
51%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Twins Given that this is a future game and no starting pitchers or specific lineups are yet confirmed, the prediction relies on general team perfo...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Predicting totals without knowing starting pitchers is speculative. However, T-Mobile Park is generally considered a neutral-to-pitcher-frie...
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Minnesota Twins A -1 spread pick requires a team to win by at least 2 runs. Given the uncertainty surrounding this future game, especially the starting pitc...
2 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
over Predicting the first five innings totals is highly sensitive to starting pitchers. As this information is unavailable, the prediction defaul...
2 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Seattle Mariners |
52%
Over 7.5 |
60%
Minnesota Twins +1.5 |
53%
Minnesota Twins |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Seattle Mariners Based on training data through 2025-09, the Mariners have a strong home-field advantage at T-Mobile Park. The Twins show better recent form,...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 7.5 Both teams have been scoring above average recently, with the Twins averaging 5.6 runs per game and the Mariners 4.0 over their last five. T...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Minnesota Twins +1.5 The Twins have been winning games comfortably, and even in losses they tend to keep it close. A spread of +1.5 gives them a cushion that is...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Minnesota Twins The Twins' strong recent form suggests they start games well, and their offense has been productive early. Without specific pitcher data, th... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 4/6
Minnesota enters with superior recent form (4W-1L vs Seattle's 2W-3L over the last 5 matches) and a +12 run differential advantage. Seattle'...
The Minnesota Twins have demonstrated strong recent form with four wins in their last five games, scoring 28 runs and conceding 16. In contr...
Mariners hold home advantage at T-Mobile Park while Twins recent form edge is offset by poor road splits in training data. Both clubs enter...
Based on the provided recent form, the Minnesota Twins (WWWWL) show stronger momentum compared to the Seattle Mariners (LLWWL). Although the...
Given that this is a future game and no starting pitchers or specific lineups are yet confirmed, the prediction relies on general team perfo...
Based on training data through 2025-09, the Mariners have a strong home-field advantage at T-Mobile Park. The Twins show better recent form,...
Over / Under
Consensusover 4/6
Minnesota's recent scoring pace (28 runs over 5 games; 5.6 per game) and Seattle's leaky defense (10 runs conceded in 5 games; 2 per game) s...
Both teams have shown the ability to score runs recently, with the Twins averaging 5.6 runs per game and the Mariners averaging 4 runs per g...
August Seattle nights trend warm with moderate humidity increasing carry. Both offenses posted above-average run rates in recent windows per...
T-Mobile Park is generally known as a pitcher-friendly ballpark, which often suppresses total runs. The Mariners' recent form shows a tenden...
Predicting totals without knowing starting pitchers is speculative. However, T-Mobile Park is generally considered a neutral-to-pitcher-frie...
Both teams have been scoring above average recently, with the Twins averaging 5.6 runs per game and the Mariners 4.0 over their last five. T...
Spread
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 3/6
Minnesota's 4-1 form and offensive edge (28 runs in 5 games vs Seattle's 20) support a spread advantage. The away side has demonstrated cons...
The Minnesota Twins' recent form, including a 4-1 record in their last five games, suggests they are likely to win by at least two runs agai...
Seattle's home run-line record in training data edges above .500 against AL Central clubs. Twins recent wins came against weaker pitching so...
Given the Minnesota Twins' superior recent form, picking them to cover the +1.5 run line feels appropriate. This implies they are likely to...
A -1 spread pick requires a team to win by at least 2 runs. Given the uncertainty surrounding this future game, especially the starting pitc...
The Twins have been winning games comfortably, and even in losses they tend to keep it close. A spread of +1.5 gives them a cushion that is...
First 5 innings
ConsensusMinnesota Twins 3/6
Minnesota's offensive pace and Seattle's defensive vulnerabilities suggest early scoring opportunities. First-inning scoring in modern MLB h...
The Minnesota Twins have been strong in the early innings, scoring an average of 3 runs in the first five innings over their last five games...
Starting pitcher matchup and early lineup order favor Mariners in first five frames per historical splits. Twins road offense struggles earl...
The First Five Innings outcome heavily relies on starting pitching and early lineup performance. Assuming competitive starting pitchers with...
Predicting the first five innings totals is highly sensitive to starting pitchers. As this information is unavailable, the prediction defaul...
The Twins' strong recent form suggests they start games well, and their offense has been productive early. Without specific pitcher data, th...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Minnesota Twins
GPT-4o Mini
Minnesota Twins
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Minnesota Twins
DeepSeek V3
Seattle Mariners
Grok 4 Fast
Seattle Mariners
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Minnesota Twins
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
2731cede23a332a9…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Aug 1 · 02:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 18015,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "T-Mobile Park",
"league": "Major League Baseball",
"starts_at": "2026-08-01T02:10:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 01 Aug 2026 02:10:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Minnesota Twins",
"home": "Seattle Mariners"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWWWL",
"record": "4W-0D-1L",
"scored": 28,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 16
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LLWWL",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 20,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 10
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 23,
"home": 23
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.