Seattle MarinersvsChicago Cubs
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Seattle Mariners 3/6 models |
Seattle Mariners 3/6 models |
over 3/6 models |
Seattle Mariners -1.5 2/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
52%
Under 4.5 |
58%
Chicago Cubs |
54%
Under 8.5 |
55%
Chicago Cubs +1.5 |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Under 4.5 The first five innings typically feature starting pitchers in their best form with fresh bullpen support not yet deployed. Seattle's defensi...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Chicago Cubs Chicago enters with superior recent form (3W-2L vs Seattle's 2W-3L over the last 5 matches) and has scored 21 runs against Seattle's 20 in t...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Under 8.5 The away team (Cubs) has conceded 33 runs across 5 matches, indicating vulnerable or fatigued pitching, but the home team (Mariners) has con...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Chicago Cubs +1.5 Chicago's superior recent form (3W-2L vs 2W-3L) and marginally higher run output support a closer contest than the 1.5-run line implies. The... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Seattle Mariners |
55%
Seattle Mariners |
60%
over |
55%
Seattle Mariners |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Seattle Mariners The Mariners' home advantage and the Cubs' road struggles suggest they are likely to lead after the first five innings. The favorable hittin...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Seattle Mariners The Seattle Mariners have a strong home advantage at T-Mobile Park, with a solid home record this season. The Chicago Cubs have struggled on...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown inconsistent scoring patterns recently, but the Mariners' home advantage and the Cubs' road struggles suggest a higher...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Seattle Mariners The Mariners' home advantage and the Cubs' road struggles suggest they are likely to win by at least one run. The favorable hitting conditio...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Mariners |
56%
Mariners |
52%
over |
51%
Mariners -1.5 |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Mariners Early-game advantage leans to the home starter based on historical platoon splits. Mariners have held leads after five innings more often at...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
56%
Mariners Mariners hold home-field edge at T-Mobile Park. Cubs recent form shows offensive inconsistency while Mariners pitching staff has kept games...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Warm August conditions at T-Mobile Park historically boost offense. Both teams have averaged over 9 runs per game in recent outings. Trainin...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Mariners -1.5 Seattle bullpen depth gives them the edge to close out games. Cubs have struggled to cover run lines on the road. Training data through 2025... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
57%
Seattle Mariners |
55%
Seattle Mariners |
60%
under 7.5 |
52%
Seattle Mariners -1.5 |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
57%
Seattle Mariners The outcome of the first five innings heavily depends on the starting pitching matchup. Given T-Mobile Park's historical characteristics and...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Seattle Mariners This prediction is based on general historical team performance and MLB trends, as specific real-time data for August 2026 is unavailable. T...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
under 7.5 T-Mobile Park is renowned for suppressing runs due to its dimensions and atmospheric conditions, favoring lower-scoring games historically....
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Seattle Mariners -1.5 Given the lean towards the Mariners in the moneyline market and their historical strength in pitching at home, a win by more than one run is... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
over |
55%
Chicago Cubs |
60%
over |
52%
Chicago Cubs |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
58%
over Both teams have shown the ability to score runs early in games. The starting pitchers are not expected to completely dominate, and with the...
4 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chicago Cubs The Chicago Cubs have a slight edge due to stronger recent offensive form, despite both teams having equal rest. Their higher scoring output...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Considering the offensive potential of both teams and the park factors at T-Mobile Park, which generally favors hitters, the game is likely...
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Chicago Cubs Given the slight edge in offensive form for the Cubs and the potential for a moderately scoring game, covering a -1 spread appears more like...
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
57%
Seattle Mariners |
62%
Seattle Mariners |
55%
Under 8.5 |
50%
Seattle Mariners -1.5 |
|
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
57%
Seattle Mariners Predicted from training data through 2025-09, no real-time info. The Mariners' strong starting pitching should control the early innings, es...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Seattle Mariners Predicted from training data through 2025-09, no real-time info. The Mariners have a strong pitching advantage at home with a top-tier rotat...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 8.5 Predicted from training data through 2025-09, no real-time info. T-Mobile Park suppresses offense, and both teams project to have average li...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Seattle Mariners -1.5 Predicted from training data through 2025-09, no real-time info. The Mariners' run prevention is elite, and they have a better bullpen, whic... |
|||||
First 5 innings
ConsensusSeattle Mariners 3/6
The first five innings typically feature starting pitchers in their best form with fresh bullpen support not yet deployed. Seattle's defensi...
The Mariners' home advantage and the Cubs' road struggles suggest they are likely to lead after the first five innings. The favorable hittin...
Early-game advantage leans to the home starter based on historical platoon splits. Mariners have held leads after five innings more often at...
The outcome of the first five innings heavily depends on the starting pitching matchup. Given T-Mobile Park's historical characteristics and...
Both teams have shown the ability to score runs early in games. The starting pitchers are not expected to completely dominate, and with the...
Predicted from training data through 2025-09, no real-time info. The Mariners' strong starting pitching should control the early innings, es...
Match winner
ConsensusSeattle Mariners 3/6
Chicago enters with superior recent form (3W-2L vs Seattle's 2W-3L over the last 5 matches) and has scored 21 runs against Seattle's 20 in t...
The Seattle Mariners have a strong home advantage at T-Mobile Park, with a solid home record this season. The Chicago Cubs have struggled on...
Mariners hold home-field edge at T-Mobile Park. Cubs recent form shows offensive inconsistency while Mariners pitching staff has kept games...
This prediction is based on general historical team performance and MLB trends, as specific real-time data for August 2026 is unavailable. T...
The Chicago Cubs have a slight edge due to stronger recent offensive form, despite both teams having equal rest. Their higher scoring output...
Predicted from training data through 2025-09, no real-time info. The Mariners have a strong pitching advantage at home with a top-tier rotat...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
The away team (Cubs) has conceded 33 runs across 5 matches, indicating vulnerable or fatigued pitching, but the home team (Mariners) has con...
Both teams have shown inconsistent scoring patterns recently, but the Mariners' home advantage and the Cubs' road struggles suggest a higher...
Warm August conditions at T-Mobile Park historically boost offense. Both teams have averaged over 9 runs per game in recent outings. Trainin...
T-Mobile Park is renowned for suppressing runs due to its dimensions and atmospheric conditions, favoring lower-scoring games historically....
Considering the offensive potential of both teams and the park factors at T-Mobile Park, which generally favors hitters, the game is likely...
Predicted from training data through 2025-09, no real-time info. T-Mobile Park suppresses offense, and both teams project to have average li...
Spread
ConsensusSeattle Mariners -1.5 2/6
Chicago's superior recent form (3W-2L vs 2W-3L) and marginally higher run output support a closer contest than the 1.5-run line implies. The...
The Mariners' home advantage and the Cubs' road struggles suggest they are likely to win by at least one run. The favorable hitting conditio...
Seattle bullpen depth gives them the edge to close out games. Cubs have struggled to cover run lines on the road. Training data through 2025...
Given the lean towards the Mariners in the moneyline market and their historical strength in pitching at home, a win by more than one run is...
Given the slight edge in offensive form for the Cubs and the potential for a moderately scoring game, covering a -1 spread appears more like...
Predicted from training data through 2025-09, no real-time info. The Mariners' run prevention is elite, and they have a better bullpen, whic...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Seattle Mariners
Claude Haiku 4.5
Chicago Cubs
Grok 4 Fast
Mariners
GPT-4o Mini
Seattle Mariners
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Seattle Mariners
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Chicago Cubs
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
e63d7ca825554ac5…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Aug 22 · 02:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 27488,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": "T-Mobile Park",
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-08-22T02:10:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 22 Aug 2026 02:10:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Chicago Cubs",
"home": "Seattle Mariners"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWWLL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 21,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 33
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LLWWL",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 20,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 10
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 44,
"home": 44
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.