Sara Sorribes TormovsCadence Brace
CBAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Sara Sorribes Tormo 5/5 models |
2 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Sara Sorribes Tormo |
58%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Sara Sorribes Tormo Sara Sorribes Tormo is an established WTA tour player with consistent hard-court performances, while Cadence Brace is a lower-ranked America...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 2.5 The ranking and experience gap between Sorribes Tormo and Brace suggests a relatively decisive match outcome in straight sets is more likely... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
82%
Sara Sorribes Tormo |
78%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Sara Sorribes Tormo Sara Sorribes Tormo holds a far higher ranking and proven results on hard courts compared to the unknown Cadence Brace. Training data throug...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
78%
under_2.5 Sorribes Tormo dominates lower-ranked players and rarely drops sets on hard courts. Brace's inexperience makes an extended match unlikely. T... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
72%
Sara Sorribes Tormo |
60%
3 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Sara Sorribes Tormo Based on my training data up to my last update, Sara Sorribes Tormo is the more experienced and established player with a strong defensive g...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
3 sets Sara Sorribes Tormo's matches frequently go to three sets due to her defensive style and ability to retrieve every ball, often leading to pr... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Sara Sorribes Tormo |
58%
Cadence Brace |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Sara Sorribes Tormo Sara Sorribes Tormo is a more established player with a stronger WTA tour pedigree. While Cadence Brace may have some potential, Tormo's exp...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Cadence Brace Given that Sara Sorribes Tormo is favored, it's likely she can secure a victory in two sets. However, Cadence Brace is not a pushover and mi... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
75%
Sara Sorribes Tormo |
60%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Sara Sorribes Tormo Sara Sorribes Tormo is a clay-court specialist with consistent WTA experience, whereas Cadence Brace appears to be a lower-ranked player wit...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
under 2.5 Given Sorribes Tormo's superior consistency and Brace's likely lower level, a straight-sets win is probable. Sorribes Tormo rarely drops set... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusSara Sorribes Tormo 5/5
Sara Sorribes Tormo is an established WTA tour player with consistent hard-court performances, while Cadence Brace is a lower-ranked America...
Sara Sorribes Tormo holds a far higher ranking and proven results on hard courts compared to the unknown Cadence Brace. Training data throug...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Sara Sorribes Tormo is the more experienced and established player with a strong defensive g...
Sara Sorribes Tormo is a more established player with a stronger WTA tour pedigree. While Cadence Brace may have some potential, Tormo's exp...
Sara Sorribes Tormo is a clay-court specialist with consistent WTA experience, whereas Cadence Brace appears to be a lower-ranked player wit...
Over / Under
Consensus2 1/10
The ranking and experience gap between Sorribes Tormo and Brace suggests a relatively decisive match outcome in straight sets is more likely...
Sorribes Tormo dominates lower-ranked players and rarely drops sets on hard courts. Brace's inexperience makes an extended match unlikely. T...
Sara Sorribes Tormo's matches frequently go to three sets due to her defensive style and ability to retrieve every ball, often leading to pr...
Given that Sara Sorribes Tormo is favored, it's likely she can secure a victory in two sets. However, Cadence Brace is not a pushover and mi...
Given Sorribes Tormo's superior consistency and Brace's likely lower level, a straight-sets win is probable. Sorribes Tormo rarely drops set...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Sara Sorribes Tormo
DeepSeek V3
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Claude Haiku 4.5
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
55a3c9914f153686…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 8 · 20:55 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 38996,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Kia Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-08T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 08 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Cadence Brace",
"home": "Sara Sorribes Tormo"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.